None of the talking heads on TV or any
columnists have dealt with one of the major reasons the US and EU want to get
rid of Libya's Muammar Qaddafi. It's not about "human rights." That is a cover
-- they want to stop Qaddafi's money that is going to form and support the
African Union.
This is not a pro- or anti-Qaddafi article; it is an
attempt to make clear an aspect of this situation that none of our major media
have discussed, but may be at the heart of our hurried rhetoric that Qaddafi
should step down because -- as the senile Senator McCain keeps saying, "Qaddafi
is crazy" -- and other outlandish things. WE are given all the negative things
against Qaddafi, so that he seems bizarre, crazy, a lunatic, etc. These are
the same type of lies Ronald Reagan made up about Qaddafi "hit squads" --
lies later quashed by none other than Secretary of State George Schultz, when he
told a joint committee of Congress in Oct. 1986 that the story about the Qaddafi
"hit squads" was pure disinformation!
Without Qaddafi's money, there will be no money for
African Union peace-keeping forces, no major unity in Africa and no power to
stop the continued colonialism of America and the EU from advancing further into
Africa.
Most American and European citizens don't know of the
African Command that America has set up in Djibouti to
interfere in the domestic affairs of African nations. This "Command" is nothing but another colonial tool; it had
its hand in making a mess of Somalia, Sudan, Nigeria and
now Libya. No matter how much America denies this, those of us who
know how our American "black ops" work and who have long followed our colonial
intentions, are aware of this new move against the African continent.
There were a few stories about this African Command in some of our newspapers, but then nothing; and Africans
leaders are upset about it. They are also upset about our new naval base in
Djibouti. But none of our major media ever talks about it anymore, and none talk
about the Qaddafi money that bankrolls the African Union.
With this in mind, don't follow all the propaganda and
lies being told to us every day on every American "news" outlet. This brings to
mind Newspeak -- propaganda, or the language
"designed to diminish the range of thought," in George Orwell's
novel, 1984 -- and was evident on TV, radio and newspapers (especially the New
York Times, Washington Post, Chicago Tribune and LA Times since it was taken
over months ago by a friend of the New York Times Sulzberger family). This is
about not only the EU's desire to control Libyan "sweet crude," but also about
the West's attempt at stopping the full development of the African
Union.
One
last note, there have been photos of Africans being lynched in Libya. We don't
know who they are, but we do know there are African Union members sending troops
to help Qaddafi against the American backed "rebels." But
remember this, Libyans are black, blue black, dark brown, brown, dark tan, tan
and white -- the Africans who are helping Qaddafi are black and the ones
fighting Qaddafi are mostly white -- so if there is any lynching going on, it is
more likely the white Libyan "rebels" doing the alleged lynching.
But if anyone needs to know the truth about American and EU lies, one has but to look at Pravda and Xinhua news that make clear that, according to their satellites, Qaddafi's air force did not attack the Libyan people. To better understand this, please, please, rent the movie, WAG THE DOG to see how Hollywood makes movies to help America lie to the world in order to continue their empire and colonial building.
2
2
2
