Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
1 comment

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

A Western Liberal and 'The Good Man in Africa'

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

opednews.com

Preconceived ideas of what is best for someone else leads to all sorts of problems, especially when the "best intentioned" doer really knows very little about the other person. This is because only each person hirself (I use "hir" for a gender neutral 3rd person) knows what is in hir own best interest.. Others can only assume, each doing so based on hir own values, what someone else desires or dislikes. These others are assuming how someone else assesses each choice that presents itself and decides what will or will not add to the maximization of that person's lifetime happiness, the goal of each person's life (whether or not s/he recognizes it). That is truly assuming a great deal!

The "Golden Rule" - "do unto others as you would have done unto you" - is a maxim used by many without, I think, sufficient thought. Each individual is unique in hir values and therefore what one would like to have for hirself is very often not what another would choose. The "Golden Rule" instead assumes that all humans are the same. If a person is going to think of "doing unto others" at all, then at least a rephrasing of this old maxim is necessary - "do unto others as each would want to be done unto". This, however, would require that each person know another very well as to what s/he values before any "doing unto" takes place, or be ready to accept the consequences of dislike (and even negative social preferencing) as a result of doing the wrong thing (no matter how "well-meaning" it was).

When this "Golden Rule" approach is taken in regard to many people at the same time it is using generalization - one of the worst forms of thinking that exists and a major (if not the primary) reason for so much misunderstanding between many individuals, and often down-right hatred by some for still some others.

Along this line I came across a very interesting Viewpoint article at BBCNewsonline by a Felix Riley who is described as a private investor and considers himself a "Western Liberal". He went to Zambia to buy a copper mine.

No imperialistic exploitation for this 21st Century capitalist.

Partnership was my byword and "putting something back" was my mission.

Riley's briefly given experience was very interesting, and definitely eye-opening to him, after some exposure to real people in Zambia.

So, to do business in Zambia, I resolved to set aside my Western Liberalism. I put away my preconceptions of what The Good Man in Africa does and how he behaves and how he does business.

After his last venture out into the bush, he concluded his article,

Hmm... Back to square one for my experiment in Western Liberalism.

I'm not sure if Felix Riley has now come to realize that even in Africa, people are all individuals and cannot be lumped into groups by country, language, tribe or even family. I'd sure like to know that he's doing some thinking about what his experience really means before jumping into a variation on his last business venture attempt. This same thought applies to a great many other people everywhere out trying to "do good", whether in their family, neighborhood, town, country or the entire world.

Riley's entire Viewpoint at BBCNews Online

 

http://selfsip.org

I am a professional life-extensionist and liberty promoter who practices what I and husband, Paul Wakfer, encourage. More detail about both of us - philosophically and physically - at http://morelife.org/personal/ When the comment time period has closed at OpEdNews.com, readers are welcome (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Outrageous Health Care Charge - Personal Example of Response

Tax/Regulation Protests are Not Enough

The Goal Society: Is it 'A Real Life Economy'?

WikiLeaks: What Can One Person do to Help?

Laissez Faire Capitalism and the Current World Financial Mess

Just a Charismatic Presidential Candidate?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

"Hir" is purposely used in this article ... by Kitty Antonik Wakfer on Saturday, Dec 6, 2008 at 7:40:53 PM