Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 1   Valuable 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 1/7/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (10 comments)

A Religious Dimension to Environmentalism? Nothing Ridiculous About It

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (14 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

People often speak dismissively of the spiritual aspect of
environmentalism. "Environmentalism is a religion," they say, as
if the ridiculousness of such an attitude were patently obvious.
But they never look further to examine, let alone evaluate, what the
environmental vision is and what is the moral/spiritual ethic behind
this supposed religion.


A close and honest look would show there's nothing ridiculous about it.


Environmentalism is about the relationship between humankind and the
natural world--the natural world in which we are embedded and on which
we depend for our very lives.


Environmentalism calls for that relationship to be one of care and harmony rather than reckless destruction.


Environmentalism sees in the living systems of the earth something worthy of respect and even reverence. Something sacred.


There's nothing unusual about people having religious feelings about
the natural order. Indeed, in the context of the many human
cultures throughout the ages, what is strange is the failure to see
anything sacred in nature.



As an ethic for honoring the sacred, environmentalism seems as legitimate as other religious ethics.


"Live in harmony with the earth," as we are all too slowly beginning to
learn, is ultimately as essential to Wholeness in the human system as
"Love Thy Neighbor." Indeed, it is a form of the same
ethic.


"Give us this day our daily bread" is a request that will be granted
only so long as we maintain our soils and waters and a stable climate
with which to grow the staff of our lives.


Like the Biblical commandments, "Live in Harmony with Nature" entails a
kind of obedience to an authority bigger, and more important, than our
own desires.


With the environmental ethic, as with the Biblical commandments, there
is also --in this obedience to commandment-- an indissoluble element of
self-interest: obey or else.


In the case of the Bible, one of the motivating factors behind
obedience is to avoid God's wrath. With environmentalism, the
punishment for misbehavior is a form of "natural consequences." It is
simply a natural property of the system that if it goes down we go with
it: a moral order not of wrath expressing itself from above but
of karmic justice.


Destroy your home and you will be homeless.


But the environmental ethic also like the Biblical teachings--is not
just about self-denial or self-protection. It is also about love,
and appreciation, and reverence. Only a person incapable of awe
can go very far into knowledge of the mind-boggling complexities, the
dynamic harmonies, of the living systems of the earth without being
struck by their beauty and wholeness.


In both the environmental and Biblical ethics, some desires must be
suppressed, some pleasures must be denied, because there are more
important values at stake.


The spiritual dimensions of environmentalism are not necessarily
alternatives to our civilization's religious traditions, but can be a
legitimate aspect of those traditional religions.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Andy Schmookler is running for Congress in Virginia's 6th District.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Had You by shadow dancer on Thursday, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:17:55 PM
we are where we are by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Thursday, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:58:42 PM
Thanks For by shadow dancer on Thursday, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:50:19 PM
$ / Greed / Destruction/Apoclapse by Philip Pease on Friday, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:45:42 AM
I don't get the purpose of this article. by Janiece Senn on Friday, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:06:40 PM
Thank you. by Wisewoman on Friday, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:39:07 PM
Garden of Eden by Robert N Smith on Friday, Jan 8, 2010 at 8:51:59 PM
Environment and Sense of the Sacred by Reinhold Hinz on Friday, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:23:32 PM
appreciative reply to Reinhold Hinz by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Saturday, Jan 9, 2010 at 3:14:03 PM
A Person by shadow dancer on Saturday, Jan 9, 2010 at 4:27:12 PM