Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite Get Embed HTML Code View Article Stats
9 comments

View Ratings | Rate It

A Picture is Worth A Billion Words. REWRITE!!!

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
General News


opednews.com

Text of the REAL 13th Amendment:

Nearly as soon as I finished this article I was contacted with more information.  Think of this as a form of live blogging. If there are more documented insights, please send them on!  They are much appreciated.  

"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any Emperor, King, Prince, or foreign Power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."

Facts can be inconvenient, they can refute the comfy box in which we live. But facts are facts, like the speed of light.

A fact is provable. It is not opinion. It does not care if it makes you uncomfortable or refutes your senior thesis in high school. It just is.

In a matter such as the removal of the Original 13th Amendment from public view the best evidence is documentation that shows it as having been public knowledge, widely accepted and referred to, at the time. That evidence exists.

Here are examples of books printed between 1819 and 1867. All include the text for the 13th Amendment as reproduced above. The text is identical in each case. Clearly, since the 13th Amendment now referred to was passed by the Thirty-eighth Congress, on the 31st day of January, 1865, and was declared, in a proclamation of the Secretary of State, dated the 18th of December of that same year, this is not an oversight.

Here you can see with your own eyes the original 13th Amendment appearing in a book printed not five years before.

(After writing this article I was contacted by an individual who referred me to a site that quotes extensively from, "

Legislative Extracts Relative to Amendment Of The
Constitution of the United States of America

Commonwealth of Virginia
1810 to 1819

The ongoing dialogue on the adoption of the 13th Amendment makes the chain of logic involved very clear and answers the questions as to why the Amendment was adopted. The rejection of a society that enforced classes through titles of nobility began much earlier in American history, in fact was at the foundation of the settlement of the New England colonies.  The Leveler traditions had added to the ongoing issues on the relationship of the individual with God, resulting in radical changes in the Puritan dogma from the time of the first generation of settlement until the Revolution.  The underlying theme of individual rights, granted by God has always been the spiritual awareness that all humanity are One, making divisions based on class the antithesis of American philosophy.  Furthermore, the British had burned Washington D. C. and the White House.  That, and their influence in monetary matters concerned the many individuals who had now fought two wars for their freedom.  

 
That leaves fewer questions to be answered.

The Original 13th Amendment is explained through contemporary events and  through the words of those who voted it into law.

Was there a 13th Amendment passed soon after the Constitution was ratified? A The evidence is an irrefutable Yes. The original 13th Amendment appears in all copies of the Constitution for The United States of America printed between 1819 and 1867. After that date the 13th Amendment referred to in all copies of the US Constitution printed previously is replaced with no explanation with the very different 13th Amendment passed in 1867, which refers to slavery.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://acpillsburyfoundation.org/image.php

Melinda Pillsbury-Foster is the author of GREED: The NeoConning of America and A Tour of Old Yosemite. The former is a novel about the lives of the NeoCons with a strong autobiographical component. The latter is a non-fiction book about her father (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Extremely interesting! by Cheryl Abraham on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:56:21 AM
Esquires are the issue by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:56:30 AM
Oh Melinda - from your mouth by Cheryl Abraham on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:06:20 AM
The limitations are only imaginary by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:29:49 AM
I don't have time right now... by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:22:58 AM
I posted the article. by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:41:33 AM
From another even more exhaustive website. Lots more there. by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster on Tuesday, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:40:27 AM
Title Of Nobility amendment by Ty on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:30:38 PM
So basically what you are saying by Paul Magill Smith on Tuesday, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:19:11 AM