Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   17 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

A New Transubstantiation: Contraception Becomes Abortion if One Believes Deeply

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 7/8/14

Become a Fan
  (22 fans)

From flickr.com/photos/47422005@N04/13538487725/: Christian Values Sampler - On Sale Now at Hobby Lobby (Made in China)
Christian Values Sampler - On Sale Now at Hobby Lobby (Made in China)
(image by DonkeyHotey)

The air is full of allegations, exaggerations, misinformation, and justified outrage about the Supreme Court's rulings in the Hobby Lobby case. Here's mine: This case is just another of their attempts to change reality. (Remember Bush II when they actually did.)

Justice Alito says of the subject case, "according to their religious beliefs the four contraceptive methods at issue are abortifacients."

If they were, I could understand their reluctance to provide insurance to cover them. I, like many other Americans, hate abortion. Just like I wish there were no guns in the hands of mentally ill people, I wish there were no abortions. Neither is going to disappear any time soon.

But in scientific fact, these drugs are not abortifacients. They are contraceptives. This is not an ambiguous issue. These kinds of pills don't cause abortions. And according to the manufacturers, users, physicians, the research scientists who developed them, and any other normal human being capable of reading the bountiful written material on them, they are contraceptives.

But the court has tried to change reality by insisting that the prevailing science may be contradicted based on "strongly held religious beliefs."

This is simply not the function of a Supreme Court Justice even if they did appoint a president who wasn't elected by the people. That is, to deny scientific and medical reality and claim that to believe it devoutly somehow changes it.

Here's a thought experiment for you: Roman Catholics believe in transubstantiation; the communion wafer becomes the actual body and blood of Jesus Christ during the Mass.

How many of you Protestants, Jews and Muslims think that because a Roman Catholic believes in transubstantiation deeply, the communion wafer actually becomes the body and blood of Jesus? I thought so.

This move on the part of the Supreme Court has done a few terrible things to this country: It affirms the court's belief that they can change reality, a fact proven politically when they appointed George Bush II to the presidency in 2000. Now its opened the flood gates for religious exemptions as proven by the current lobbying efforts of some religious communities for more. And it has affirmed that corporations are not only people, but a special kind of people, who have a religion and exist above the laws of the land.

It's easy to get confused on issues like this because they hit us at the level of our core values and stir up our emotions. But make no mistake, my argument is not about the morality of abortion. It's about the willingness of the highest court in the land to attempt to redefine objective reality again, this time using religious belief as a measuring device.

When we lose our grounding in objective reality and replace it with the vagaries of religious fervor or political leanings, we are no longer a modern, first world country. We're moving backwards.

You don't believe me? Just check out how we compare to other modern countries on measureable criteria, not national bravado and bluster.

As a side note: It's interesting that the very people who claim to value their independence above all else are so willing to allow religious authorities to take it away.

As to respect for this ruling from the highest court in the land, Justice Kagan says, "Those who are bound by our decisions usually believe they can take us at our word, not so today." The court's action, Kagan added, even "undermines confidence in this institution." I add, even more than in 2000 with our first appointed president?

The sun will rise tomorrow as sure as autumn will follow summer. And no amount of religious fervor can change that objective physical reality any more than it can make contraception into abortion.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Author, columnist and blogger with a long career in business management, management consulting and executive coaching. I am a certified ontological coach. I've studied clinical therapeutic practices in Gestalt psychology and am a Certified Birkman (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Illinois Is Now on Board. We Can Carry Concealed Weapons in Every State.

The Primary American Meme: Be Afraid.

What Jesus said and What the Christian Lunatic Fringe Hears.

Don't be Fooled: Black Racism Causes White Racism

This Pope Makes Me Want to be an Atheist

Ethan Couch: An Example of the Pathology of Wealth

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 people are discussing this page, with 17 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Why do you single out the mentally ill pertaining ... by Chris Cook on Tuesday, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:23:34 PM
Why do you single it out in an article that has an... by Robert De Filippis on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:40:50 AM
I am sorely tempted to argue all people with guns ... by Maxwell on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:00:16 PM
Well, now let's be fair: only those dimwits are de... by Robert S. Becker on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:13:52 PM
By your Catch 22 logic, Obama is stark raving mad.... by Chris Cook on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:50:49 PM
You may well ask how many Catholics really, truly ... by Maxwell on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:57:57 PM
Do Catholics, who believe everyone goes to Heaven ... by Simon Leigh on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:06:38 PM
There are three social taboos which are illegal un... by Archie on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:56:11 PM
Unless devoted Catholics believe they are not cons... by Robert S. Becker on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:04:12 PM
I state it as I see it! ... by Archie on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:21:01 PM
Don't we all on a page for opinions? I just thoug... by Robert S. Becker on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:39:35 PM
Welcome back, Robert, after your interim. I misse... by Robert S. Becker on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:09:26 PM
Thank you. You wrote, "Obviously, this culture has... by Robert De Filippis on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:21:38 PM
Hey Bob - Glad to see you back; missed you. Excel... by David Sykes on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:08:57 PM
Thanks Dave ... by Robert De Filippis on Thursday, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:01:19 AM
Completely agree, great article.I would like to st... by BFalcon on Friday, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:39:22 AM
Bravo! It seems that a great many people prefer a ... by Jo Anne Simson on Sunday, Jul 13, 2014 at 11:47:10 AM