Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

A New Russian ICBM Development?

By       Message Dave Lefcourt     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 10/8/14

- Advertisement -

From en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STRAT-X: STRAT-X - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
STRAT-X - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(image by en.wikipedia.org)
  DMCA

Russian ICBM being tested, date unknown

This from Paul Craig Roberts latest article, "Washington Is Destroying The World", OPEDNEWS, October 7, 2014, "As a result of Washington breaking its word and putting ABM missile bases on Russia's border, Russia has developed supersonic ICBM's that can rapidly change trajectory and can not be shot down by any defense system" and "Russia has more deployed nuclear weapons than the US".

With regard to China, Roberts asserts, "Last year China released a pictorial description of how China's nuclear forces could destroy the US. China has now added to its nuclear arsenal a new variant of one of its mobile ICBM's."

Roberts does not reveal the source of these disclosures but if true-and there's no reason to question the veracity of his assertions-then the whole idea of "Full Spectrum Dominance", official Washington's plan to control the land, air, seas and space, have a nuclear first strike capability and prevent a Russian or Chinese retaliatory strike is pure wrongheaded thinking-though as Roberts asserts, "Of course, the US corporations making billions of dollars selling Washington a useless ABM system will deny this."

But denial of reality is a neo-con specialty with these ideologues ruminating about the current administration, the Congress or in think tanks around the beltway, all at the forefront pushing for regime change in the Middle East but also eventual regime change in Russia. Lest they fail to "accomplish" this little "feat", they seem to be envisioning initiating a nuclear first strike on Russia and China.

As I have alluded on these pages previously [i] , any nuclear first strike thinking is sheer lunacy. A retaliatory strike can not be prevented and beyond that ANY nuclear conflagration would end all life on the planet.

- Advertisement -

Thus short of destroying all current nuclear arsenals and banning the manufacture of new ones-a sane though highly unlikely proposition anytime in the near future-the only realistic position is return to MAD, "mutually assured destruction", the previously position held by both sides in the Cold War whereby each side knew any side which initiated a nuclear first strike would automatically bring a retaliatory strike by the other and bring its own annihilation. Thus a potential nuclear conflagration was effectively deterred.

Since the end of the cold war in 1991, mutually assured destruction has become an anathema to the neo-cons and with their madness gripping official Washington, the absurd belief of initiating a nuclear first strike and preventing a retaliatory strike with a totally 100% effective ABM system has reemerged, which Roberts debunks saying it can't be done.

It seems obvious both Russia and China is fully aware of US machinations yet has been judicious in not exacerbating the madness now gripping the US colossus.

This not weakness, but I believe a calculation whereby sanity could return to official Washington once it again recognizes a nuclear war is futile, unwinnable, insane and would bring its own annihilation.

There are no secrets among nations any longer. Assuming Roberts is correct and "Russia has developed supersonic ICBM's that can change trajectory and cannot be shot down by any missile defense system" the US also knows of that development.

- Advertisement -

Is it possible official Washington would continue on its present destructive course and go for broke initiating a nuclear war?



[i] "A Nuclear War Would Be Insane", OPEDNEWS, March 18, 2014

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 2   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

dglefc22733@aol.com
Retired. The author of "DECEIT AND EXCESS IN AMERICA, HOW THE MONEYED INTERESTS HAVE STOLEN AMERICA AND HOW WE CAN GET IT BACK", Authorhouse, 2009

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".