Share on Google Plus
  1
Share on Twitter
  20
Share on Facebook
  187
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  2
210 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
11 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

A Huge Fraud: Right Wing Advocacy of "Freedom and Liberty" Is A Fraud

Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   Well Said 2   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 10/6/13

opednews.com


US Capital by From Clicker with permission

US Capital by From Clicker with permission

Ever since billionaires like the Koch Brothers began funding fake grassroots movements under the Tea Party banner we've heard a lot of talk about "Freedom" and "Liberty."  Ron Paul almost always finds a way to decorate his vision of a libertarian paradise in the rhetoric of liberty and freedom.  Many of the angry faces we've seen at Tea Party events weave their idea of "taking our country back" as a vision to "restore" liberty and freedom from those (Communists and evil Kenyan Socialists) who've kidnapped our nation.

It's a clever word game that fools many Americans.  The first deception is to define liberty and freedom in ways that fit the kind of government they want, but bear no relation to what the Forefathers actually created. 

The second deception is the idea  that the far-right's "liberty groupies" want a nation where the idea of one-person, one-vote is a sacred principle and majority rule regardless of the outcome is respected.  The belief that these people favor this notion is another giant hoax.

While the Tea Party is a phenomenon of the last few years the far right, backed by conservative wealthy businessmen as far back as the 1950s, began an effort to push back against Roosevelt's New Deal.  They hated FDR's support of Labor's right to organize and negotiate fair treatment with employers.  They opposed minimum wage laws, child labor laws, the income tax, and virtually any tax on corporate income.  They fought New Deal programs to pull the nation out of depression.  Many fought the civil rights movement and actively campaigned to block the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  Much of their opposition to these things was masked in the rhetoric of anti-communism.  

Joe McCarthy's demagogic technique of branding political opponents as communists without any proof, helped the far right advance the idea that communism was a real domestic threat, and that campaigns for civil rights, stronger laws to protect workers, and similar "progressive" efforts, were really part of a "communist conspiracy" to bring socialism and then communism to American shores and create a Soviet-like police state.

Enter the John Birch Society, established in 1959 and founded by candy company executive Robert H. W. Welch.  Welch was most notable as the right-wing figure who branded President Dwight D. Eisenhower as a possible "conscious dedicated agent of the Communist Conspiracy."  This language combined with the fact that Welch criticized politicians like Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan as being too liberal, gives you a sense of Welch's extreme views.

In starting the Birch Society Welch set forth in what became known as the "Blue Book of the John Birch Society" his ideas about the goals of the Society, the organizational structure it would embrace, and the tactics it would employ.  One of the basic "operational rules" of the Society is that monthly chapter meetings are led by a "Chapter Leader" who follows the agenda set forth in the monthly (at least it was monthly back in the day...) Bulletin of the Society.  Welch's Blue Book was quite explicit in stating that the goals of the Society in saving the nation from communism were far too serious to permit the use of Robert's Rules on any other form of parliamentary procedure.  It was his belief that you joined because you believed in him and any form of the democratic process was only an opening that Commies and their sympathizers would exploit to disrupt a meeting and infiltrate the organization.

Consider the following language extracted exactly without out editing from Welch's Blue Book: 

"Those members who cease to feel the necessary degree of loyalty can either resign or will be put out before they build up any splintering following of their own inside the Society. As I have said, we mean business every step of the way. We can allow for differences of opinion. We shall need and welcome advice. And we expect to use the normal measure of diplomacy always called for in dealing with human beings. But whenever differences of opinion become translated into a lack of loyal support, we shall have short cuts for eliminating both without going through any congress of so-called democratic processes."

My point in all this is to make clear that the kinds of people who support the Birch Society then and now, which are largely the same folks electing Tea Party radicals to Congress today, have no use for freedom and liberty when it doesn't suit their purpose.

I noted in an earlier article that the GOP's attack that President Obama and the Democrats won't negotiate is just another verbal scam.  The fact there is nothing to negotiate in terms of opening the government.  The first rule the police use when dealing with hostage takers is to insist that the hostages be released "and then we'll talk."   The current GOP strategy is to hold the government hostage buy refusing to fund the Affordable Care Act until the President agrees to nullify this valid law he and the Democrats fought hard to adopt and the Supreme Court had determined to be Constitutional.

Given the Republicans sudden desire to negotiate, it makes you wonder where all these champions of negotiation go to hide when workers and their unions are looking for laws to protect their right to negotiate with employers.

Where were these Members of Congress when Republican Governors like Scott  Walker, John Kasich, Rick Snyder were repealing virtually every negotiating right their state government workers had earned over the years?

The bottom line is clear.  The current Republican leadership in the House and Senate have no desire to negotiate with anyone, much less the President Obama or the Democrats in Congress.  They seek to impose their will through gerrymandered districts (a uniquely American form of Apartheid), abuse of longstanding rules and understandings, and the sheer power of being backed by an eager cadre of millionaires who seek a one-party state with them in control. Their idea of freedom and liberty and the rhetoric they so frequently use to hide their real agenda, is one huge hoax the American people need to understand.

If you have an interest in learning more about the Birch Society and how the radical right got where it is today I suggest the book Wrapped in the Flag: A Personal History of America's Radical Right

 

Dedicated and proud liberal, political news junkie. Formerly active in local politics in New Jersey and at one point employed as Aide To The Mayor of a central NJ community of 50,000. Currently writing a manual about Opposition Research for use (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

If Borders Books Shuts Down Will They Blame Obama?

Raffi Willilams (Juan Williams' Son) and the Generational Attack on Obamacare

A Huge Fraud: Right Wing Advocacy of "Freedom and Liberty" Is A Fraud

Sadly, It Seems Like Everything Has Become Political. Right-wing hate speech can ruin friendships.

Blaming The Poor For Wall Street's Mess: The Game Continues

McCarthyism 2010: The Phony Rage of GOP Resurgence

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Who was the one who said: "Patriotism is the last ... by Guglielmo Tell on Sunday, Oct 6, 2013 at 11:06:14 AM
Samuel Johnson.  In 1774, he printed The Patr... by Bob W Ryley on Sunday, Oct 6, 2013 at 11:25:46 AM
There is no doubt in my mind that the conservative... by liberalsrock on Sunday, Oct 6, 2013 at 1:33:36 PM
Unfortunately there are people that support their ... by anna kakol on Sunday, Oct 6, 2013 at 6:49:18 PM
You are right on target, Bob. The Koch Brothers ar... by Howard Schneider on Sunday, Oct 6, 2013 at 2:08:41 PM
Yes, the meaning of Freedom and Liberty can be twi... by roy lutz on Monday, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:11:55 AM
You definition of freedom and liberty is not unusu... by Bob W Ryley on Monday, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:25:18 PM
It's obvious that your definition of freedom and l... by roy lutz on Monday, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:04:19 PM
Correction: "I am NOT the absolutist you imply."... by roy lutz on Monday, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:09:25 PM
I am. And I am a conscious follower of Karl Marx's... by Guglielmo Tell on Saturday, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:36:08 AM
Thank you for your honesty. Most followers of Marx... by roy lutz on Tuesday, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:19:14 PM