Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   20 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News

A Future without Impeachment Paints a Bleak Picture

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 6/24/08

Despite heroic efforts by Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) to bring 35 Articles of Impeachment against Bush, the wildfire of information and affirmation of these articles in print and in the blogosphere, and the efforts of so many within the impeachment movement, the main-stream media continues to marginalize Kucinich's effort by either ignoring the story altogether or publishing simplistic 200 word articles about it. Main-stream media insists, despite polls that say otherwise, that impeachment is not popular and because George W. Bush is a lame duck at this point, impeachment is unnecessary.

Is George W. Bush a lame duck? Is impeachment at this point unnecessary? What kind of future can we look forward to if Bush is never impeached? In order to answer these questions it is important to look at what impeachment is and what it would do.

  • Impeachment would open up investigations by the judiciary committee into the 35 Articles of Impeachment against George W. Bush.

  • If the judiciary committee finds that these investigations show that crimes have been committed a resolution will be issued to the House, which then goes on to a Floor vote, and if voted through by a majority will lead to a trial in the Senate.

  • The trial in the Senate would be run similar to a court trial, with the full Senate acting as jury with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, (John Roberts), acting as judge. Once the arguments of the prosecution and defense are heard the Senate would meet in a closed session to deliberate, the Senate would then vote in open session on each Article of Impeachment a two-thirds vote is needed for a conviction. On conviction the official, (Bush), would be removed from office, if a two-thirds vote is not reached the official would be acquitted.

If convicted, Bush would be removed from office, but even if Bush was not convicted in the course of the impeachment spectacle the crimes of the Bush administration would be aired, debated, and proclaimed to the world. No longer could the media ignore the vast legacy of criminality that the Bush regime has perpetrated for the last seven years, and the people of the world would hear all the dark dirty secrets and crimes that this regime has kept and committed and there would be a resounding outcry for justice.

Not only would the Bush regime's deadly crimes be laid bare, but it is highly probable that an impeachment trial would completely prevent Bush from attacking Iran. Article XXI charges Bush with: "Misleading Congress and the American People About Threats from Iran, and Supporting Terrorist Organizations Within Iran, With the Goal of Overthrowing the Iranian Government". Surely with such a charge pending trial and with a public challenge on the validity of any action against Iran being heard in the Senate, no declaration of war could be acted upon during that time.

The fact that George W. Bush has pushed and continues to push for war with Iran shows that he is far from a lame duck. Bush and his administration are continuing their agenda unabated and virtually unchallenged. Impeachment could be instrumental in preventing Bush from starting another illegal, pre-emptive, and baseless war.

Not only can impeachment lay bare the crimes of the Bush regime for the world to see, remove Bush from office, and at the same time prevent war with Iran, impeachment can also serve another extremely vital function: the impeachment process can serve as an example to future leaders of what will happen to them if they decide to subvert the rule of law.

But what will happen if Kucinich's 35 Articles of Impeachment quietly die in judiciary committee and the crimes of the Bush regime are not investigated? If the Bush regime's crimes are not investigated will these crimes then become accepted behavior by America's leaders? If no one is held to account for authority over-stepped, laws undermined, rule of law flouted, and torture codified, what's to stop the next president, and the next and the next and the one after that from following suit?

To allow George W. Bush to go virtually unchallenged in any significant and legal way now is to allow a foundation of corruption and despotism to be laid at the feet of every president after him: an absolutely flawless model for sidestepping accountability and practicing unchecked and unfettered powers.

Imagine a progression and a continuation of the agenda of the Bush regime year after year. Imagine the aftermath that a pre-emptive and deadly bombing of Iran will have on the world, not only the horrendous death and destruction such an act would immediately cause, but the worldwide economic fall-out, and the possibility of an increase in the ferocity of the wars already being waged and the likely increase in terrorism in retaliation for the actions of George W. Bush. Such a future portends to be a much darker version of our current reality.

A future without impeachment paints a frighteningly bleak picture, a picture that at this point many of us can see but too few of us are acting to prevent. If ever there was a time to act, now is that time. Congressman Kucinich has promised to re-introduce the 35 Articles of Impeachment against Bush within 30 days of the first introduction if the judiciary committee does not act. That's just a few short weeks from now. It's time, right now, to promote the necessity of impeachment as widely as possible. It is imperative that the Bush regime be driven from office and held accountable for its many crimes - it's time to act now.

At this point the future in unwritten; which one we get is up to us.

 

Artist, Activist, Wife, Mother, Human Being

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The "War on Terror" is also a war on us

Why is Bush So Interested in Our Vaginas?

Invoking the Reagan Legacy – Harmless or Insidious?

Phil Donahue's "Body of War" Movie. A Review

A Future without Impeachment Paints a Bleak Picture

Reality Versus Your Comforting Illusions

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 people are discussing this page, with 20 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

How to rouse John Conyers from the deep sleep... by Aurora on Tuesday, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:23:32 PM
Instead of 15 - 20 people doing a sit-in in his of... by Cheryl Abraham on Wednesday, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:18:29 AM
I thought you’d like to check out the politi... by Jay Foster on Tuesday, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:29:04 PM
If the Democrats in Congress continue to push asid... by Ellison Horne on Wednesday, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:04:27 AM
Great statement. There are so many things wrong wi... by Cheryl Abraham on Wednesday, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:24:14 AM
At least there was a man of honor. Was K Street b... by Wolfie on Wednesday, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:47:15 AM
Kudos to Cheryl on this one. There are many, ... by Ivan Hentschel on Wednesday, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:52:57 PM
Thank you for your well thought out response. Yes,... by Cheryl Abraham on Wednesday, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:20:58 PM
Getting the American people to "move", i... by Ivan Hentschel on Wednesday, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:10:52 PM
 CONGRESS AND THE SENATE ARE LAUGHING AT US ,... by RICH SHA on Wednesday, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:22:28 PM
I can't say that I speak for everyone else pos... by Ivan Hentschel on Wednesday, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:32:23 PM
NOBODY WANTS TO HEAR THE TRUTH, NO IMPEACHMENT NEV... by RICH SHA on Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:09:15 AM
I'm hardly cranky. But from the vantage point ... by Ivan Hentschel on Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:53:43 AM
Nowhere in the Constitution is any branch except&n... by RICH SHA on Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:16:52 AM
Pelosi will not allow impeachment hearings and thi... by Cheryl Abraham on Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:54:51 AM
THIS WAS  FROM THE POPULIST PARTY  A PRI... by RICH SHA on Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:25:47 AM
WHY haven't WE caused Impeachment of Cheney? ... by John H Kennedy on Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:28:44 AM
I have made this known in print and by telephone t... by Cheryl Abraham on Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:40:12 AM
The last paragraph of Ms. Abraham's lamentation sa... by LarryWBryant on Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:46:37 AM
I would also recommend that you buy Vincent Buglio... by Cheryl Abraham on Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:47:45 AM