Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 16 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 5 (22 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   6 comments, 6 series

Life Arts

A Free Speech David Takes On Goliath About "The Last War Crime" Movie

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

News 2   Supported 2   Interesting 2  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 12/8/13

Become a Fan
  (74 fans)
- Advertisement -

'I don't know. I don't know!'" populumcaptn="'The Last War Crime' movie
(image by 'The Last War Crime' movie)

My guest today is The PEN, activist and policy advocate. Welcome back to OpEdNews, PEN. 

JB: When we spoke back in January, 2012, we discussed The Last War Crime, the film you made about indicting Dick Cheney for torture. There are many people who are not aware of your film's existence, let alone its contents. Can you fill us in?

PEN: Sure, so nice speaking with you again, Joan.  As usual, you are right on top of things.  At that point, we were working hard literally around the clock to finish up the post production for the movie.  And we didn't stop.  And we are just now at a point where we are ready to make available a limited edition of what people call a "screener" DVD.  Our plan at this point is to empower people to organize their own home and community screenings, and to get word out about the completion of this project that way.  If someone wants to obtain a copy of the screener, we are asking them to commit to doing such a local screening, and they can do so at this link.

Our goal for the The Last War Crime film project was, in the first instance, to tell the true story of how we were misled into an attack and invasion of Iraq, which now even the neocons have been forced to admit has been a strategic catastrophe.  But they have also tried to revise history as if they could not have known that the intelligence was bad, when in fact they knew (or should have known) all along that the intelligence and war sales pitch were garbage (a polite word).  And how could they have known that?  Because they got that "intelligence" from torturing people, notorious throughout history for being used to obtain false confessions.

So, the first third of the film recreates in docudrama style the historical events from the morning of 9/11 to the Colin Powell UN speech.  But we also wanted to imagine what it would have been like if some courageous U.S. attorney had uncovered evidence of the war crimes committed by Dick Cheney and George W. Bush, and done something to hold people accountable while they were still in office.  This is not that farfetched if you remember the U.S. attorney firings and the scandal about that because they would not politicize their jobs.  

JB: Yes, I remember that well.

- Advertisement -

PEN: And the rest of the film tells an entertaining dramatic story around such a fictional vision.  Call it a political fantasy fulfillment film if you like.

When we last spoke about the progress of the getting out word of The Last War Crime film, we talked about how YouTube had banned one of our preview clips, for completely bogus reasons, and how MTV/Viacom had refused to run an ad for the movie on their Times Square jumbotron.  Despite over 12,000 protest messages we were able to mobilize about that, Viacom just ignored us and I had suggested to you that we were considering some kind of federal lawsuit as a recourse.

'Am I being terminated?'" populumcaptn="'The Last War Crime' movie
(image by 'The Last War Crime' movie)

JB: Yes. 

- Advertisement -

PEN: After that, the same thing basically happened again when we tried to submit an ad for The Last War Crime movie to the top political news/talk radio station in Washington, DC.  The excuse there for rejecting an ad for our film was that it was too "controversial."  

And judging that was our best test case, representing ourselves we did in fact file a federal lawsuit in the DC federal district court captioned a "Complaint for Political Speech Discrimination." That was in November of 2012, against that radio station and their parent corporation, the second largest radio station conglomerate in the country.

Not surprisingly, defendants' counsel, one of the top 50 law firms in the country, quickly filed an obligatory motion to dismiss, which I think we brushed aside quite effectively with the opposition we filed.  The way these court procedures work: the side that files a motion has a automatic opportunity to file a reply to our opposition, but they are not supposed to bring up new issues in that reply, that we would not have had a fair chance to respond to in writing.  But, fearing they were losing the argument we think, that's exactly what the other side tried to do, even to the point of making, in our view, serious misrepresentations about the contents of legal precedents.  

We hit the law library again and researched what the appropriate legal reaction should be in such a situation, and then filed our own motion to ask permission to file what is called a surreply, a rare procedural remedy that the Court has discretion to grant or not, and which is generally not favored.  Defendants opposed our surreply request motion, we exercised our right to reply to that, and that last filing took us to the end of January, earlier this year.

'How do they get away with this? It's just wrong.'
(image by 'The Last War Crime' movie)

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

Other Series: View All 33 Articles in "the Arts"

Other Series: View All 4 Articles in "war"

Other Series: View All 11 Articles in "film"

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Google Content Matches:
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Ten million humans marched against the Iraq War, b... by Daniel Geery on Sunday, Dec 8, 2013 at 10:45:22 PM
We now know the sources were false confessions by ... by The Pen on Monday, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:13:27 AM
"Just following orders" filter down from the top w... by Lance Ciepiela on Monday, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:36:07 AM
When Elected President Obama was coming into offic... by The Pen on Monday, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:19:58 AM
Funny, but don't you just love it when the "free" ... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Monday, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:26:10 PM
The missing perspective: The fact that 9/11 and th... by Jon Fox on Monday, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:07:49 PM