Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

A Collective Sigh

By       Message Richard Girard     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 7 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Inspiring 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Author 149
Become a Fan
  (40 fans)
- Advertisement -

Thomas Jefferson 1821 by Thomas Sully by U.S. Senate Art Gallery-Public Domain

A Collective Sigh

By Richard Girard

"Men are to be guided only by their self-interests. Good government is a good balancing of these; and, except a keen eye and appetite for self-interest, requires no virtue in any quarter. To both parties it is emphatically a machine: to the discontented, a 'taxing-machine'; to the contented, a 'machine for securing property.' Its duties and its faults are not those of a father, but of an active parish-constable."

Thomas Carlyle; Signs of the Times, 1829; first published in Edinburgh Review, No. 98.

"Good government is the outcome of private virtue."

John Jay Chapman; Practical Agitation, chapter 2, 1898.

I start this article with these two strong and seemingly contrary statements. Carlyle states that good government is the balancing of self-interest, requiring "no virtue in any quarter." Chapman contradicts this statement, stating outright that "Good government is the outcome of private virtue." Both of these statements cannot be correct.

- Advertisement -

Or can they?

The great physicist Niels Bohr once stated (and I'll paraphrase here) that while the opposite of a trivial truth is a falsehood, the opposite of a "great truth" is another "great truth." At that moment, Dr. Bohr was speaking of the seeming contradictions that existed in physics in the study of relativistic and quantum mechanics. However, there are times when his statement is equally true when studying mankind and its institutions.

On the surface, Carlyle's statement seems to be the essential conservative world view: that government is at best a necessary evil, whose sole good is ensuring the security of property rights, but every penny for that security is a cause for contention; every request for money to better ensure the safety of their property is met with cries of "taxes are theft," as if an agreement to a service for a set amount, entitles them to improved service at that same amount for all time.

Carlyle recognized this fault, pointing out in the same essay, "For the 'superior morality,' of which we hear so much, we too would desire to be thankful: at the same time, it were but blindness to deny that this 'superior morality' is properly rather an 'inferior criminality,' produced not by greater love of Virtue, but by greater perfection of Police; and of that far subtler and stronger Police, called Public Opinion." The sense of entitlement that so often accompanies great wealth is nothing new in the world.

In that statement, Carlyle intones the death knell for the justification of Ayn Rand's Objectivism, and every other form of anarcho-capitalist libertarianism, as well as the unmitigated greed of Wall Street financiers that has evolved over the last eighty years.

- Advertisement -

In my experience, too many libertarians take the basic ideas for their system of political/economic thought, and--without any awareness of the consequences--they unwittingly take those ideas to their logical, but amoral conclusions. They do this without realizing that their new system is not only impractical, but that it is as completely unworkable as any Marxist pipe dream.

It is for this reason that Robert Locke (in his article in the March 14, 2005 issue of The American Conservative) was correct when he called libertarianism "The Marxism of the Right." (See also Mike Huben's " A Non-Libertarian FAQ ," for more on this subject.)

Many libertarians like to use Thomas Paine's quote from chapter 1 of Common Sense (1776), "Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one." The most extreme among them use this as the justification for decreasing government to a size where, in Grover Norquist's famous phrase, "it can be drowned in a bathtub."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7


Must Read 1   Inspiring 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Richard Girard is an increasingly radical representative of the disabled and disenfranchised members of America's downtrodden, who suffers from bipolar disorder (type II or type III, the professionals do not agree). He has put together a team to (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Great Enemy of the Truth

Into a Thousand Pieces

The Communist Takeover of America

The Judgment of History; Or Why the Breaking of the Oligarchs Avenges President Kennedy's Assassination--Part One

Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense

Social Capitalism