Tag(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Interesting 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 11/25/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

80 years ago today

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (81 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

80 years ago today, on October 29th, 1929, Wall Street saw the worst day in its history. The shock of "Black Tuesday" came to an end, but the misery of the Republican Great Depression was just beginning. As a result of the disaster that followed three successive Republican administrations - and their cutting regulations and dropping taxes on the most wealthy from over 70 percent to under 30 percent - the Roosevelt administration through most of the 1930s re-regulated the economy and raised taxes on the very rich back up to 91 percent. That led to fifty years of growth and prosperity, which came to an end with Ronald Reagan re-introducing the Harding/Cooledge/Hoover tax cuts and supply-side economics. Hopefully the Obama Administration will soon learn the lesson of the last Republican Great Depression and follow in FDR's footsteps.
The nation's top credit rating agencies have managed to fend off a crackdown from Washington by relying on a surprising ally - the First Amendment. Even though their key role in the most recent economic disaster, the three big bond raters--Standard & Poor's, Moody's and Fitch--are ready to do it again. With assistance from two of the best constitutional lawyers in the country, these corporations have successfully argued that when they make a error -- like, awarding the top triple-A grade to a multibillion-dollar bundle of bonds that later default or to a company like Enron - yes, they did that -- that when they do that, they cannot be sued or held accountable. Why? Because ratings are opinions, the agencies claim, protected by the constitutional right to free speech. Corporations should have first amendment rights that the founders wrote only for people? What's next? That corporations will claim the Fourth Amendment right to privacy to hide their crimes? Oh, yeah, Dow Chemical has already asserted that, and actually won. That they assert a Fourteenth Amendment right against discrimination? Oh, yea, that's how hog farms and Wal-Marts get forced on communities that don't want them. We really need to reboot the Supreme Court, which has created out of thin air the idea that corporations are "persons" entitled to the protections of the Bill of Rights.

 

http://www.thomhartmann.com

Thom Hartmann is a Project Censored Award-winning New York Times best-selling author, and host of a nationally syndicated daily progressive talk program on the Air America Radio Network, live noon-3 PM ET. more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Well said Thom by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:09:25 PM
Thank you!! by Jeffrey Rock on Thursday, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:35:35 AM
If Wally World is not a person, by Allan Wayne on Thursday, Nov 26, 2009 at 3:41:44 PM