Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (5 comments)

2007 Technology Tests of Computerized Voting Systems

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (2 fans)   -- Page 8 of 8 page(s)

opednews.com

By adding extra security measures against the over-emphasized threat posed by outsiders, one can actually increase the risk posed by insiders.

For example, today’s mobile phones often combine a processor, execution memory and tamper-resistant key storage to make sure only the manufacturer (who has the cryptographic signing keys) can update the software. These mechanisms can sometimes still be circumvented, but at least they offer a layer of security that is completely absent in the Nedap ES3B.  But by adding ‘security’ in this way, the device could also resist any attempts to independent inspectors to see what code it is actually running. 

UCONN University of Connecticut Security Assessment of Diebold Optical Scan system, 2006 Abstract:

We identify a number of new vulnerabilities of this system which, if exploited maliciously, can invalidate the results of an election process utilizing the terminal.  

An Accu-Vote Optical Scan can be compromised with off-the-shelf equipment in a matter of minutes even if the machine has its removable memory card sealed in place. The basic attack can be applied to effect a variety of results, including entirely neutralizing one candidate so that their votes are not counted, swapping the votes of two candidates, or biasing the results by shifting some votes from one candidate to another.  

Such vote tabulation corruptions can lay dormant until Election Day, thus avoiding detection through pre-election tests. 

UCONN University of Connecticut Security Assessment of Diebold Touch Screen (TSx) system, 2007. 

The attacks presented in this report were discovered through direct experimentation with the voting terminal and without access to any internal documentation or the source code from the manufacturer. 

We present two attacks based on these vulnerabilities: one attack swap the votes of two candidates and another erases the name of one candidate from the slate.

These attacks do not require the modification of the operating system of the voting terminal, and can be launched in a matter of minutes, requiring only a computer with the capability to mount a PCMCIA card file system (a default capability in current operating systems). 

Security problems are present in the system despite the fact that a cryptographic integrity check appears to be employed in the voting system’s memory card.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8

 

In 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of voter signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books.

Her blogs also address religious, gender, sexual and racial equality, as well as environmental issues; and are sprinkled with book and film reviews on various topics. She spent most of her working life as a researcher or investigator for private lawyers, and five years as an editor.

She graduated from The Ohio State University's School of Agriculture in December 2003 with a B.S. in Natural Resources.

All material offered here is the property of Rady Ananda, copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. Permission is granted to repost, with proper attribution including the original link.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." Tell the truth anyway.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Excellent article! - One More Vulnerability to Mention by Runner on Tuesday, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:43:46 AM
Got citations? by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Dec 11, 2007 at 1:30:15 PM
If voting could change things - they'd make it illegal. by Mr M on Tuesday, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:11:57 PM
BTW by Mr M on Tuesday, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:15:49 PM
thanks for the kudos by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Dec 11, 2007 at 2:10:30 PM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2012, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum