Why did senior demolitions contractor Danny Jowenko, when he saw bldg 7 fall, say, “That was a controlled demolition?”
Why did Fire Engineer and editor of Fire Engineering magazine Bill Manning say, “…the official investigation by FEMA is a half-baked farce that may have already been commandeered by political forces whose interests, to put it mildly, lay far afield of full disclosure. The structural damage from the planes and the explosive ignition of jet fuel were not enough in themselves to bring down the towers?”
Why are hundreds of architects and engineers saying that the official theory of collapse violates the fundamental law of Physics known as conservation of momentum?
Why are hundreds of architects and engineers saying that the official theory of collapse violates the fundamental law of Physics known as conservation of mass-energy, or e=mc2?
Why are hundreds of architects and engineers saying that the official theory of collapse violates the second law of thermodynamics which states that an asymmetry will increase over time, thus making straight-down collapse impossible?
Why are they saying that even if it collapsed, it could not possibly collapse all the way to the ground?
If 911 was an inside job, would all this make sense?
Why isn’t the media asking these questions?
Why isn’t every American?
Despite an overwhelming media bias supporting the official story, a showbiz tonight e-mail poll received an 81% yes response to the question, “Do you agree there is a government cover-up of 911?” A CNN poll gave an astounding 89% yes response. Whatever they are hiding, it is probably very important, and the American people, in fact, all the world, deserves to know. From a recent Zogby poll, twenty million Americans are convinced that the government made it happen on purpose. Sixty million consider it likely. An enormous 140 million believe the government knew (based on strong evidence) and let it happen on purpose. It sounds like a big difference, but I would suggest that the two theories amount to the same thing. To let it happen on purpose is to invite it. It is complicity already. It is a case for treason.
The strongest argument I have yet heard against the inside job theory is that people cannot believe the government would do it, cannot imagine how they could have done it, or how that many people could keep a secret. First, the CIA has on its website declassified documents concerning Operation Northwood, a false flag (pretending another country was responsible) mission nixed by Kennedy after it got military approval. It involved sinking a US boat, soldiers and all, then blaming it on Cuba. The government can and has done similar ops, openly admitting to many. See Operation Ajax, Gulf of Tonkin, USS Liberty attack, and the Lavon affair, to name a few. The government experimented with radiation on its own citizens from 1944 to 1994 through injections and pills given to unsuspecting participants, even children and pregnant mothers. All secret for fifty years. Google it and see. A prominent Congressman of the time argued that the Great Depression was engineered by the Federal Reserve. (More on this later).
Second is the objection: how could they have accomplished it? Or, it sounds too much like a conspiracy theory. This is double-think of the grossest sort. 19 hijackers could somehow accomplish this, including the NORAD stand-down and the intelligence community’s willful ignoring of massive data. A group of terrorists plotting secretly to hijack planes and fly them into buildings is itself a conspiracy theory. It’s merely the one we’ve been told over and over again. Therefore, we believe it. But look at the ACTUAL EVIDENCE, a small portion of which is above. This seems to be extraordinarily difficult for most people. They simply will not look. Bizarrely, scientists are even more susceptible to this, despite their refrain of basing theories on empirical and forensic data. Sadly, it stems from fear. The dissociative process resulting from ACTUALLY LOOKING and finding out the truth in this matter, threatens the entire world-view.
Now, how could they accomplish it? 4000 lbs of thermite explosive would take out any of these buildings. That much could be carried in on ten janitorial cart loads. CIA and Delta force operatives are the most elite, well-trained covert specialists in the world. Why would a bunch of stock brokers and computer programmers suspect anything from a team of workmen? Six could rig the building in eight to ten days. The center columns were accessible, but hidden from sight. There were many empty floors, shutdowns, and company offices moved about in the weeks before. Aside from the controlled demolition, the 19 hijackers had to accomplish every other part of the mission and some of their own, like learning to fly large aircraft and obtaining financing. Why on earth would it be easier for them than for expert covert ops specialists acting with complicit assistance from the nation’s executive leadership?
Commercial airliners fly to a landing based on a homing beacon, with slight modifications from the pilot. Conventional technology is in common use to allow a pilot to remotely guide an aircraft, even from a simulator. As little as ten people is enough for this part of the mission. Or perhaps the hijacking was real and the black ops helped.
Supposedly, the hijackers did it with box-cutters, yet the masterful logicians of the Official Theory prove that the United States black ops forces would be unable to do it with the best technology available and an overwhelming home-field advantage. The hijackers had to arrange for massive incompetence or complicity from the most sophisticated and well-trained military defense system on the planet. The hijacker theory is patently absurd. Why is it so believed?
The reality of media control is verified with little effort. See how many of these facts can be proven to your satisfaction based on internet research, yet were never reported in the media. We have the further quote from former CIA director William Colby, “The Central Intelligence Agency owns anyone of any significance in the major media.” Look up project Mockingbird, a CIA plan put into effect years ago to control the media. Or read the Rolling Stone report on CIA reporters. As media guru Marshall McLuhan said, ‘Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity.’
