Tags for This Article:

Government (3045)  People (2502)  Policy (1012)  Privatization (724)  Poverty (585)  Imperialism (550)  Capitalism (480)  Crisis (445)  Empire (420)  Washington (387)  Banks (55) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...)  (less...)
Add to My Group
November 28, 2007 at 06:15:10

Reviewing James Petras and Henry Veltmeyer's "Multinationals on Trial"

by Stephen Lendman     Page 7 of 8 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

-- FDI strips states of their ability to control "investment decisions, pricing, production and future growth;"

-- FDI results in long-term capital outflows repatriated to corporate coffers;



-- FDI results in "unbalanced and overly specialized production," especially in commodity areas;

-- Tax, subsidy and other concessions to FDI deprive developing states of needed revenues;

-- FDI most often only puts existing enterprises under new management; it seldom creates new ones;

-- FDI creates "enterprise enclaves," imports technology linked to "outside production and distribution networks," and doesn't help local economies;

-- FDI often controls local banking that lets it "shape state credit and interest policy" and decide what industry sectors to favor and at what cost; and

-- With investors attracted to extractive industries and freed from regulatory constraints, environmental devastation results.

In sum - FDI endangers "national independence, popular sovereignty, and severely compromis(es)" developing states' ability to control their destiny and represent all their people. It's a "risky, costly and limiting (one-way) strategy." Developing nations need to minimize it because of its harmful economic, social and political costs.

Chapter 8 - Anti-Imperialist Regime Dynamics

Contrary to Margaret Thatcher's TINA dictum (there is no alternative), many others are better and the authors list them:

-- Reinvestment of profits into local production to stimulate a "multiplier" effect and increase local consumption;

-- Control foreign trade to retain foreign exchange earnings;

-- Invest pension funds in productive activities;

-- Create development banks for overseas workers' remittances home so funds can be used productively;

-- Place a moratorium on debt payments to stop servicing the odious portion of it:

 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8

 

I am a 72 year old, retired, progressive small businessman concerned about all the major national and world issues, committed to speak out and write about them.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

What I Learned At The Sarah Palin Rally Before They Threw Me Out! by Linda Milazzo

30 Lies Refuted about Ayers and Obama Posted by John Wilson

Representatives Were Threatened with "Martial Law" if Bailout Bill Did Not Pass by Patrick Henningsen

This Is Our Obama! Posted by Donna Roepenack

Those Who Call Obama A Muslim Posted by Rob Kall

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

The End of American Hegemony by Paul Craig Roberts

Meet The $700 Billion Bailout Czar by Rob Kall

Martial Law? by Jayne Lyn Stahl

I Just Prevented Thousands of Californians from Having to Vote on Provisional Ballots! by Emily Levy

Go To Top 50 Most Popular