Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

FOREIGN POLICY QUESTIONS FOR THE NEXT PRESIDENT ANSWERED BY A COGNITIVIST-NOT A NEO-CON, A NEO-LIBERAL, NOR EXTREME RIGH

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (3 fans)   -- Page 7 of 7 page(s)

opednews.com

 

Thanks to these budgetary and poor investment and agrievous spending patterns, the USA is now seen in Europe and elsewhere as the “Sick Man of the Global Economy”.  The BBC has reported several times in recent weeks that “whenever the U.S. economy wheezes or sneezes, Europe and the rest of the globe catches a cold.”

 

This perception of America as a “Sick Man” is a dangerous precedent.  Never before in world history has the USA had such an image.

 

Another global image of America being a “Sick Man” exists in the foreign police and in defense in security—despite the USA having spent trillions of dollars in the last  years to improve defense and security.

 

Most of the world views the American armed forces as overextended and the foreign policy as being very nearsighted in general.

 

When George W. Bush came into office and began tearing up arms treaties right and left, many Americans failed to take notice or praised the gun-slinger theatrics. The rest of the planet was aghast.

e.g. Why should America put nuclear weapons and other weapons in space when they were banned years ago?

 

The answers from Washington D.C. have always been inadequate: “We are afraid sometime that someone else will do it first.”

 

The same thing was said of the ICBM treaty and the conventions on torture, on human rights, & on habeas corpus.

 

A slippery slope was begun in 2001 and now the U.S. has made such a big mess on the global stage, it will now take decades to rectify the failed attempt by a single USA administration to rewrite all the underlying rules for dozens of regimes, e.g. climate control regimes, nuclear proliferation treaty regimes, arms control regimes, human rights regimes.

 

The new White House administration must begin by apologizing for this mess and start over with a great focus on building up and not tearing down. 

 

I am willing to do that.

 How about Obama, Clinton, Huckabee or McCain?    NOTES 

“Foreign Policy Questions for the Next President”, http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/02/17/opinion/edquestions.php

 

Mayer, Peter & Rittberger, Volke, REGIME THEORY AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, http://www.questia.com/library/book/regime-theory-and-international-relations-by-peter-mayer-volker-rittberger.jsp

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

 

http://eslkevin.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/3-big-paradigms-hol

KEVIN STODA-has been blessed to have either traveled in or worked in nearly 100 countries on five continents over the past two and a half decades.--He sees himself as a peace educator and have been-- a promoter of good economic and social (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments