Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 4 Share on Facebook 4 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 6 (16 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Late Votes and the True Vote Model indicate that Obama may have won by 16 million votes

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Richard Charnin     Permalink
      (Page 7 of 8 pages) Become a premium member to see this article as one long page.
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Valuable 3   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 11/28/12

- Advertisement -

Could it be that since the winner has been decided, there is no longer an incentive on the part of the perennial vote thieves to continue switching late votes?

Could it be that the late votes are on paper ballots (provisionals, absentees), not DREs?

Could it be that the bulk of late votes are coming in from Democratic strongholds? That is true, but Obama has a 10.5% margin when the late vote shares are weighted by total state votes, which tends to refute that argument.

The consistent Democratic late vote discrepancies from the Election Day shares are not proof of fraud. But there is no reason why the phenomenon is ignored in the mainstream media and academia. Without an accurate composition of late vote demographics we cannot make a definitive judgment as to whether they are representative of the total electorate. But there are a number of reasons why Obama would be expected to do better in the late vote. The only question is: how much better? 

1) Late votes are cast on paper ballots, not DREs or optiscans. Check.

2) There is no incentive to miscount votes after the election. Check.

3) Democratic late vote shares always far exceed Election Day shares. This is indicative of a structural phenomenon. Check.

4) Blacks, Hispanics and Asians votes increased for Obama in 2012. Since the total vote declined, there were fewer white voters, increasing Obama's total share. Check.

- Advertisement -

5) When late shares are weighted by total state votes, Obama's 10.5% margin far exceeds the 2.3% Election Day Margin. Check.

Track Record: Election Model Forecast; Post-election True Vote Model

2004 Election Model (2-party shares) 

Kerry: 51.8%, 337 EV (snapshot)

State exit poll aggregate: 51.7%, 337 EV

- Advertisement -

Recorded Vote: 48.3%, 255 EV

True Vote Model: 53.6%, 364 EV

2008 Election Model

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 3   Valuable 3   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

I have Master's degrees in Applied Mathematics and Operations Research and began my career as a Numerical Control Manufacturing Engineeer for a major Defense/Aerospace manufacturer. I was employed in the Corporate Finance Division of several major (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Executive Action: JFK Witness Deaths and the London Times Actuary

Late Votes and the True Vote Model indicate that Obama may have won by 16 million votes