I leave the last word to Jim Fetzer of Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
“If you believe in coincidence, then perhaps you consider it to be a remarkable [one] that, just as the American military is being weakened in Iraq, the National Guard is being placed under the President’s direct control, and that ammunition is being cut off from police departments and armed citizens, while air defense units are being deployed to Washington, D.C., and mercenaries [i.e., Blackwater] are developing their own air force. I’m not so sure. If we have the most capable air force in the world, then why is this one needed? To do things our own air force would not do? All of these developments are troubling and lead me to think that the Kennebunkport Warning [of a second 9/11, a strike on Iran, and the imposition of martial law] may be even better founded than its signers realize.” (50)
(2) Webster G. Tarpley, “Cheney determined to strike in US with WMD this summer; only impeachment and removal, or a general strike, can stop him,” Online Journal, 23 July 2007, downloaded from http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_2220.shtml, 6 August 2007. Hereafter referred to as Tarpley 1, ibid.
(5) Jorge Hirsh, “Gen. Pace to Troops: Don’t Nuke Iran. Illegal, Immoral Orders Should Not be Obeyed,” Anti-war.com, 10 March 2006, downloaded from http://www.antiwar.com/orig/hirsch.php?articleid=8678, 6 Sept. 2007.
(6) Peter Symonds, “US Vice President Cheney menaces Iran with military aggression,” Global Research, 25 February 2007.
(11) Captain Eric H. May, “A Dawning Dictatorship? (911-2B & NSPD-51),” Price of Liberty, 6 August 2007. downloaded from http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/08/06/may.htm, 11 Sept. 2007 (hereafter referred to as May 1, ibid.); also see Webster G. Tarpley, who says Cheney was speaking on CBS’s Face the Nation, in Tarpley 1, ibid.
(13) Doug Thompson, “’I’m the President’: Bush’s Growing Madness Shocks even his Friends,” Capital Hill Blue, 1 June 2007, downloaded from http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/2618, 7 Aug. 2007.
The author is a former Member of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada and the author of several Internet-published works on cross-cultural spirituality.
Remember that so called mistake flight that flew atomic weapons over the US on its way to Louisiana? And it became a mistake, because someone reported it. All we know Cheney is cooking up his own suitcase bomb, to give to some radical they picked up from Iran on a rendition flight, and tell him to go to some city in the USA and detonate it. That would be our 2nd 911, and do you think we are going to point the blame at Cheney or Bush?
It is pretty clear to see what city they would not explode it in. Certainly not the Midwest, or in the South. I don't think they will target the Western States either. California is probably off the list because Bush caters to the Spanish crowd, and Bush is really pro immigrant amnesty. California is a food basket growing region. Which leaves where? Chicago, but that would affect Detroit the auto manufacturers wouldn't it? They have New York again, except they won't hit the trade towers again, but wouldn't that be a juicy spot? The insurance has to be much more than the old towers, that is do they have the New Freedom Tower Constructed yet? Probably not.
But they do have Wall Street to blast apart, New Jersey, Maryland, Boston Mass, Scranton Pennsylvania, Albany, but maybe they will do Detroit. Hell it is a drug infested haven, and we are not going to be getting oil out of Iran or Iraq for a while. This will force Wall Street to put money into the renewable energy sector. It will help our pal Senator Grassley. Your guess is as good as mine.
I think Chicago. Perfect spot, to get a terrorist in. He can cut across from Canada. We'll blame the Canadians for unsecure borders. Everyone will understand because most of our money went to secure the border South to keep the Mexicans out. Lots of trucks go in there. We can ship the Acase up with a trucker, where our friend can pick it up at Dunkin Donuts, jump in a taxi and go to downtown Chicago. Hey Happy New Year, and the fire works begin with Iran.
They have all the military behind him. And they are not going to let this time frame slip by I think. Cheney wants to conquer Iran before he dies, and Bush is the guy to help them realize their dreams. damn Iranian terrorists.
Chicago will be a mushroom, lots of work available to get the people back on their feet. New Auto plants will be built for renewable energy, this way the renewable energy crowd will not cause a stir because we are trying to help the environment. This will open the way for us to start drilling in Anwar Alaska to use the Oil to rebuild Chicago and when that runs out, things will be settled down in Iraq and Iran to take their Oil. Good plan!
Well America can then go attack Iran now. The Middle East region will become a nuclear zone like Japan was, and most of the fighting will stop across the region. The USA had to shoot themselves in the foot, so Russia, France, and other Superpowers will not stand in their way when the US applies it justice. After all Iranian intent to get Atomic weapons in this administrations eyes is the same as using them, and now their damn terrorist has attacked Chicago! They only needed a small bomb to attack us. We can blame the liberals for getting in the way, and not allowing us to preemptively strike Iran when we had the chance. But its to late. Chicago is in ruins.
It will be a major rerun of 911 with a much greater disaster. The generals will all rally the President and Airforce units and Aircraft Carriers will shock and awe Iran with nukes until we ask everyone in the country what did you do? I ran!
by
Dom Jermano (20 articles, 0 quicklinks, 40 diaries, 934 comments)
on Sunday, September 16, 2007 at 7:27:45 AM
Well, Larry Silverstein did recently buy the Sears Tower so that would support your theory of Chicago being the next target. There is also Portland, during Operation Noble Resolve, but that is in October and the market money is betting on before Sept. 21.
Now we have the sixth nuke to track down from the B52.
How bizarre to being discussing this! Thousands, if not millions, of people could die or be harmed if a nuke is set off in an American city. Why isn't anyone with any influence doing something about it???
by
Steve Beckow (11 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 36 comments)
on Sunday, September 16, 2007 at 1:01:48 PM
I missed the possibility, but my wife pointed it out.
Maybe the object of buying the put options was actually to LOSE the money and feed it into the market to help prop it up a bit?
I know, I'm just grasping at straws, since I do believe Portland (or Eugene, slightly to the south) is a likely target for a false flag nuke attack. Though I was "happy" to hear that Silverstein bought the Sears Tower, as that gives Chicago a definite edge.
by
Charlie L (2 articles, 2 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 638 comments)
on Monday, September 17, 2007 at 12:25:18 AM
