Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 3 Share on Facebook 13 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest 1 Share on Fark! 1 Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 4 (24 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   7 comments, 3 series

General News

Detroit is Not Broke!

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Scott Baker     Permalink
      (Page 6 of 10 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   Valuable 4   Well Said 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 8/5/13

Become a Fan
  (71 fans)
- Advertisement -

But wait a minute, this includes amortized liabilities years out, but what about amortized revenues?!    

Let's break free of the jargon for a moment, since it is misleading, perhaps deliberately so.  

It turns out, from the CAFR, that the pension and annuity benefits for FY 2012 was only half a billion dollars ($509M -- page 180).   At a consistent rate of payout, and assuming no ROI increase in the pension fund, it would take 10 years to fully exhaust the fund, but during that time, there's will also be additional money put in, in the form of employee contributions and employer contributions (e.g. $454M in FY 2012, which leaves just $55M in deficit, or about 9.3%) funded by taxes (remember those?) during that 10 years.    Since there are already enough assets in the pension fund to cover the so-called "shortfall" this year and a few years ahead, the additions alone could offset the entire projected deficit, even with modest returns.  

This section also includes deductions of:

$317,388,978 for " Premiums to Insurers and Damage Claims" and

$200,048,571 for "Member Refunds and Withdrawals" and

$ 11,725,495 for General and Administrative Expenses

- though perhaps the Premiums entry should not be paid by the workers' pension fund(?) - and these additional costs combined with the pension payouts slightly do slightly exceed a billion/year, but even at that rate, it would be 5 years before the fund is exhausted.   And remember the Reuter's article criticizing the way expected returns are calculated (see above).   ROI is very difficult to predict.   More on alternative investments that might be easier to predict, and even counter-cyclical, later.

- Advertisement -

But perhaps a more important question to be asking is: since when are governments supposed to pay expenditures from the returns on investments (ROI), instead of directly from taxes?   And since when are they supposed to make a profit?   Most people assume government expenses should be pay as you go, with just enough left over to get them through the year from that year's tax receipts.

Burien, in the email referenced above, says:

[blockquote]

Government was NOT supposed to operate at a profit. How did they get around this restriction?
 
ANSWER: If for example a city had a 100-million dollar profit for the year from any of its operations, at a stroke of a pen they create or deposit into a "liability fund" and poof, there goes the profit re-designated now as a liability.

[/blockquote] 

- Advertisement -

Now, returning to the pension fund:

First, the pension fund returns are mediocre (see above), plus they are plagued with corruption, and THAT, more than the amount of payouts, is the real story here.   But no one will take on Wall Street money (mis)managers.   No one wants to withdraw money from Wall Street brokerage houses and invest it elsewhere, least of all Comptrollers and Treasurers who want jobs there later.

Second, a Public Bank might be a much better, and counter-cyclical, investment, which would invest in the city/state.   The Bank of North Dakota's Return on Equity (ROE) has averaged 20+% for over ten years, and it has returned $300 million in dividends, while other states and cities -- like Detroit -- are paying interest on credit they could generate themselves if they deposited their money into a public bank.   A public bank can be set up in a municipality; it does not have to be done at the state level.   Even if the ROI was comparable, there would still be the added benefits of:

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Audit the Detroit CAFRs

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://newthinking.blogspot.com/

Scott Baker is a Managing Editor & The Economics Editor at Opednews, and a blogger for Huffington Post, Daily Kos, and Global Economic Intersection.

His anthology of updated Opednews articles "America is Not Broke" was published by Tayen Lane Publishing (March, 2015) and may be found here:
http://www.americaisnotbroke.net/

Scott is former President of Common Ground-NYC (http://commongroundnyc.org/), a Geoist/Georgist activist group. He has written (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Obama Explains the FEMA Camps

Was Malaysian Flight MH370 Landed Safely in Afghanistan?

Let the Sun Shine on a State Bank in Florida

Batman, The Dark Knight Rises...and Occupy Wall Street Falls

The Least Productive People in the World

Detroit is Not Broke!