Share on Google Plus
  2
Share on Twitter
  11
Share on Facebook
  96
Share on LinkedIn
  2
Share on PInterest Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  10
121 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
8 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

50 Reasons We Should Fear the Worst from Fukushima

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H1 2/3/14

opednews.com

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/89251656@N00/6412885897/: Rest in Radioactivity
Rest in Radioactivity
(image by ohallmann)


Japan's harsh dictatorial censorship has been matched by a global corporate media blackout aimed--successfully--at keeping Fukushima out of the public eye.

But that doesn't keep the actual radiation out of our ecosystem, our markets " or our bodies. 

Speculation on the ultimate impact ranges from the utterly harmless to the intensely apocalyptic .

But the basic reality is simple: for seven decades, government Bomb factories and privately-owned reactors have spewed massive quantities of unmonitored radiation into the biosphere. 

The impacts of these emissions on human and ecological health are unknown primarily because the nuclear industry has resolutely refused to study them. 

Indeed, the official presumption has always been that showing proof of damage from nuclear Bomb tests and commercial reactors falls to the victims, not the perpetrators. 

And that in any case, the industry will be held virtually harmless.

This "see no evil, pay no damages" mindset dates from the Bombing of Hiroshima to Fukushima to the disaster coming next " which could be happening as you read this.

Here are 50 preliminary reasons why this radioactive legacy demands we prepare for the worst for our oceans, our planet, our economy " ourselves.

1. At Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1945), the U.S. military initially denied that there was any radioactive fallout, or that it could do any damage. Despite an absence of meaningful data, the victims (including a group of U.S. prisoners of war) and their supporters were officially "discredited" and scorned.

2. Likewise, when Nobel-winners Linus Pauling and Andre Sakharov correctly warned of a massive global death toll from atmospheric Bomb testing, they were dismissed with official contempt " until they won in the court of public opinion.

3. During and after the Bomb Tests (1946-63), downwinders in the South Pacific and American west, along with thousands of U.S. "atomic vets," were told their radiation-induced health problems were imaginary " until they proved utterly irrefutable.

4. When British Dr. Alice Stewart proved (1956) that even tiny x-ray doses to pregnant mothers could double childhood leukemia rates, she was assaulted with 30 years of heavily funded abuse from the nuclear and medical establishments.

5. But Stewart's findings proved tragically accurate, and helped set in stone the medical health physics consensus that there is no "safe dose" of radiation " and that pregnant women should not be x-rayed, or exposed to equivalent radiation.

6. More than 400 commercial power reactors have been injected into our ecosphere with no meaningful data to measure their potential health and environmental impacts, and no systematic global data base has been established or maintained. 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

Harvey Wasserman edits  www.nukefree.org . His SOLARTOPIA! OUR GREEN-POWERED EARTH is at  www.solartopia.org . The Solartopia Green Power & Wellness Show airs at  www.progressiveradionetwork.com .

HARVEY WASSERMAN'S HISTORY OF THE US is available at http://www.harveywasserman.com/, as is A GLIMPSE OF THE BIG LIGHT and clues to the whereabouts of the Holy Grail.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Will 9 GOP governors put Romney in the White House?

Four Ways Ohio Republicans are Already Stealing the 2012 Election

Toll of U.S. Sailors Devastated by Fukushima Radiation Continues to Climb

Is Fukushima now ten Chernobyls into the sea?

Humankind's Most Dangerous Moment: Fukushima Fuel Pool at Unit 4. "This is an Issue of Human Survival."

Japan's Quake Could Have Irradiated the Entire US

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

California kelp to be tested for Fukushima ra... by yunus Luebben on Tuesday, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:24:24 AM
Overall, this is pretty good research and is more... by Don Meister on Tuesday, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:42:59 AM
People are starting to take things into their own ... by Scott Baker on Tuesday, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:02:44 PM
Naturally, since the ruling elite are not interest... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Tuesday, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:05:10 PM
Actually I did a speech Topic on Fukushima and was... by d.larae on Wednesday, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:53:25 AM
Did you find any memos questioning the location of... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Wednesday, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:36:48 AM
Either way, the location proves that nuclear scien... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Friday, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:55:46 AM
Do we really need fifty? Or just one good one? Lik... by Tim Mullins on Wednesday, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:07:48 PM