Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S. Army Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media commentator on terrorism and intelligence services (John Loftus) questions the government's version of 9/11.
Former Inspector General, U.S. Department of Transportation; former Professor of Aviation, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering and Aviation and Professor of Public Policy, Ohio State University (Mary Schiavo) questions the government's version of 9/11. Professor of International Law at the University of Illinois, Champaign; a leading practitioner and advocate of international law; responsible for drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, the American implementing legislation for the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention; served on the Board of Directors of Amnesty International (1988-1992), and represented Bosnia- Herzegovina at the World Court, with a Doctor of Law Magna Cum Laude as well as a Ph.D. in Political Science, both from Harvard University (Dr. Francis Boyle) questions the government's version of 9/11.
Former prosecutor in the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section of the U.S. Justice Department and a key member of Attorney General Bobby Kennedy’s anti-corruption task force; former assistant U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois (J. Terrence "Terry" Brunner) questions the government's version of 9/11.
Professor Emeritus, International Law, Professor of Politics and International Affairs, Princeton University; in 2001 served on the three-person UN Commission on Human Rights for the Palestine Territories, and previously, on the Independent International Commission on Kosovo (Richard Falk) questions the government's version of 9/11.
Bessie Dutton Murray Distinguished Professor of Law Emeritus and Director, Center for Human Rights, University of Iowa; Fellow, World Academy of Art and Science. Honorary Editor, Board of Editors, American Journal of International Law (Burns H. Weston) questions the government's version of 9/11.
Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice at Troy University; associate General Counsel, National Association of Federal Agents; Retired Agent in Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S. Customs, responsible for the internal integrity and security for areas encompassing nine states and two foreign locations; former Federal Sky Marshall; 27-year U.S. Customs career (Mark Conrad) questions the government's version of 9/11.
Director of Academic Programs, Institute for Policy and Economic Development, University of Texas, El Paso, specializing in executive branch secrecy policy, governmental abuse, and law and bureaucracy; former U.S. Army Signals Intelligence officer; author of several books on law and political theory (Dr. William G. Weaver) questions the government's version of 9/11.
George WashingtonGeorge Washington is a pen name. I am using the pen name, with the approval of the publisher, because I have received death threats due to my 9/11 research and writing. I am using a pen name to protect myself and my family.
This network of 911 "debunkers" seems to be an organized, well-funded group of mostly hard-core ideologues. They've got fancy web sites and they clearly are putting a lot of time into the effort. (I'll tell ya, trying to convince people that up is down and right is wrong and that they basically can't trust their own eyes, etc., is a job I certainly wouldn't want).
Anyway, some of these "debunkers" have about them an air of desperation...and you can easily sense their anger and their hatred for "truthers".
What scares me is that the conspirators (primarily a Cheney/Mossad arrangement I would guess) are probably feeling a little heat, and most likely don't like the idea of handing power over to another administration, e.g., that of Obama, if there's a finite risk of a real 911 investigation. Thus the 911 "truth movement" might have the paradoxical effect of increasing the odds of an attack on Iran (and thus possibly WW3), rather than decreasing the odds, as most of us would hope to do.
by
Harold Smith (0 articles, 3 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 467 comments)
on Thursday, February 14, 2008 at 10:57:01 PM
If I recall correctly in Bill Clinton's well known interview with Chris Wallace, Clinton said the 911 Commission report was a political document. He said, "Now the 911 Commission was a political document too...."
I have had some face to face and anonymous threats. I have had my car spray painted by crooks. If you are not willing to take a chance on your life, you do not have enough of the hatred that you need to stand up the Nazi filth. Besides, chances are that the crooks who think they run this country have terrible plans for everyone, not just you. So,, enjoy the sting of battle. Continue to afflict the comfortable and comfort the afflicted.
by
John Hanks (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1186 comments)
on Friday, February 15, 2008 at 12:37:03 PM
3 comments
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....
Must Read (
Well Said (
News (
Touching (
Funny (
Supported (
Interesting (
Inspiring (
Valuable (
