6 Aug. 2007. Paul Craig Roberts warns that “the American constitutional system is near to being overthrown.” (36)
13 Aug. 2007. Col. Donn de Grand-Pre, U.S. Army (retired), tells 9/11 Truth activist and radio talk show host Alex Jones that “there's a definite cleavage between the military of the Pentagon and the civilian hierarchy - and never the twain shall meet. … I can verify that from Col. Dick Schultz, who is a friend of mine in the Joint Chiefs. Morale was not only low but he said some of the troops are ready to mutiny. If it wasn't for the fact that the government, the civilian hierarchy, has control over retirements, there would probably be blood in the streets by now.” (37)
30 Aug. 2007. According to Jim Fetzer, members of the 1st Battalion, 265th Air Defense Artillery, are being deployed from Florida to the nation’s capital for a year’s duty, “where they will operate high-tech weapons systems against any potential air threat.” “I am not aware of any threat from the sky to the White House,” says Fetzer. “Is this to protect Bush and Cheney from foreign terrorists or are they concerned that US citizens may rise up in opposition to their suspension of the Constitution”? (38)
30 Aug. 2007. The same article reports that the control of the National Guard has been placed directly at the disposal of the President of the United States over the opposition of all fifty governors. (39)
30 August 2007. The article also alleges that police departments across the country are being starved of ammunition. “Most police ammunition is .38 and 9mm caliber, not the kind that our military requires. The profit margin on the sale and manufacture of bullets is so great and the demand is so strong that it is difficult to imagine how this could happen absent a deliberate policy to curtail access to ammo. Without bullets, those vast stocks of weapons are useless. This appears to be a very clever, insidious plan.” (40)
30 Aug. 2007. Fetzer reports that “Blackwater, USA, the private security contractor that has assembled a large mercenary force in Iraq (as part of a governmental privatization scheme to keep the official count of American forces involved artificially low) is now building its own air force in the United States, including the purchase of Super Tucano light combat aircraft from Embraer, a Brazilian company. According to the article, it has one new private military base in San Diego, another in Mount Carroll, IL, and has applied for operating licenses in every coastal U.S. state.” (41)
30 Aug. 2007. Six nuclear warheads are "accidentally" shipped by B-52 from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. Five arrive, suggesting that one has been “lost” enroute. The flight violates military procedure, which requires that nuclear weapons always be shipped on the ground in the continental US, so that if there's an accident, a bomb detonation won't occur. It would take an order from the Commander-in-Chief to put nukes on a plane. The rumors were that the plane was meant to hit 5 American cities with nuclear weapons over Labor Day weekend in order to install martial law. (42)
5 Sept. 2007. Repubican Congressman Paul Gillmor of Ohio is found dead in his home, allegedly from a heart attack. But word later leaks out that he had blunt trauma to the head and neck. The story is consequently changed to him falling down the stairs. No investigation is planned. A member of the House Finance Committee, Gillmor was investigating a series of suspicious option trades. Someone appeared to be betting billions of dollars that the market would fall 50% by September 21st. (43) [Ed. This scenario occurred before the events of 9/11 as well.]
7 Sept. 2007. OpEdNews reports that “informed speculation that the movement of the nuclear weapons to Barksdale was leaked because the air force base is a staging area for deployment to the Middle East. The Pentagon recently drew up plans to hit 1200 targets inside Iran in a massive bombardment campaign aimed at destroying its military and overthrowing its government. The movement of the nuclear weapons may have been an alert to the public by disgruntled members of the military that such plans would include the pre-emptive use of nuclear weapons.” (44)
11 September 2004. Reports circulate on the Internet that the entire Air Force will stand down on September 14th, for overhaul and review of procedures. The last stand-down, unannounced ahead of time, took place on Sept 11, 2001. Questions are raised about whether a second 9/11 is planned for Sept. 14. (45)
13 Sept. 2007. World News Daily reports that NORAD and National Guard fighters will defend the nation during the stand-down. (46) [Ed. Readers will recall that NORAD put up no effective defense against the alleged hijackers on 9/11 and that the National Guard has recently been placed under President Bush’s control.]
13 Sept. 2007. The same news report states that the stand-down on Sept. 14 was ordered by Gen. Ronald Keys to conduct a command-wide review of operations, safety procedures and checklists after the Aug. 30 incident at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota, according to the Air Force Times.
It reported that, at Minot, six cruse missiles with nuclear warheads were loaded onto a B-52H and flown to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana – without the bomber crew or ground command realizing nuclear weapons were on the aircraft. (47) It does not mention the fate of the sixth missile.
13 Sept. 2007. World News Daily also reports “Bush administration plans to utilize USNORTHCOM as a U.S. military command to direct the operations of troops deployed in a wide range of continental North American emergencies, including health epidemics, natural disasters, terrorist events and even domestic violence or civil disorder.” (48)
13 Sept. 2007.MichaelMoore.com reports that Vice-President Cheney is expected to spend Sept. 14 at the CENTCOM, U.S. Central Command, in Tampa, FL. (49)
The author is a former Member of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada and the author of several Internet-published works on cross-cultural spirituality.
Remember that so called mistake flight that flew atomic weapons over the US on its way to Louisiana? And it became a mistake, because someone reported it. All we know Cheney is cooking up his own suitcase bomb, to give to some radical they picked up from Iran on a rendition flight, and tell him to go to some city in the USA and detonate it. That would be our 2nd 911, and do you think we are going to point the blame at Cheney or Bush?
It is pretty clear to see what city they would not explode it in. Certainly not the Midwest, or in the South. I don't think they will target the Western States either. California is probably off the list because Bush caters to the Spanish crowd, and Bush is really pro immigrant amnesty. California is a food basket growing region. Which leaves where? Chicago, but that would affect Detroit the auto manufacturers wouldn't it? They have New York again, except they won't hit the trade towers again, but wouldn't that be a juicy spot? The insurance has to be much more than the old towers, that is do they have the New Freedom Tower Constructed yet? Probably not.
But they do have Wall Street to blast apart, New Jersey, Maryland, Boston Mass, Scranton Pennsylvania, Albany, but maybe they will do Detroit. Hell it is a drug infested haven, and we are not going to be getting oil out of Iran or Iraq for a while. This will force Wall Street to put money into the renewable energy sector. It will help our pal Senator Grassley. Your guess is as good as mine.
I think Chicago. Perfect spot, to get a terrorist in. He can cut across from Canada. We'll blame the Canadians for unsecure borders. Everyone will understand because most of our money went to secure the border South to keep the Mexicans out. Lots of trucks go in there. We can ship the Acase up with a trucker, where our friend can pick it up at Dunkin Donuts, jump in a taxi and go to downtown Chicago. Hey Happy New Year, and the fire works begin with Iran.
They have all the military behind him. And they are not going to let this time frame slip by I think. Cheney wants to conquer Iran before he dies, and Bush is the guy to help them realize their dreams. damn Iranian terrorists.
Chicago will be a mushroom, lots of work available to get the people back on their feet. New Auto plants will be built for renewable energy, this way the renewable energy crowd will not cause a stir because we are trying to help the environment. This will open the way for us to start drilling in Anwar Alaska to use the Oil to rebuild Chicago and when that runs out, things will be settled down in Iraq and Iran to take their Oil. Good plan!
Well America can then go attack Iran now. The Middle East region will become a nuclear zone like Japan was, and most of the fighting will stop across the region. The USA had to shoot themselves in the foot, so Russia, France, and other Superpowers will not stand in their way when the US applies it justice. After all Iranian intent to get Atomic weapons in this administrations eyes is the same as using them, and now their damn terrorist has attacked Chicago! They only needed a small bomb to attack us. We can blame the liberals for getting in the way, and not allowing us to preemptively strike Iran when we had the chance. But its to late. Chicago is in ruins.
It will be a major rerun of 911 with a much greater disaster. The generals will all rally the President and Airforce units and Aircraft Carriers will shock and awe Iran with nukes until we ask everyone in the country what did you do? I ran!
by
Dom Jermano (20 articles, 0 quicklinks, 40 diaries, 934 comments)
on Sunday, September 16, 2007 at 7:27:45 AM
Well, Larry Silverstein did recently buy the Sears Tower so that would support your theory of Chicago being the next target. There is also Portland, during Operation Noble Resolve, but that is in October and the market money is betting on before Sept. 21.
Now we have the sixth nuke to track down from the B52.
How bizarre to being discussing this! Thousands, if not millions, of people could die or be harmed if a nuke is set off in an American city. Why isn't anyone with any influence doing something about it???
by
Steve Beckow (11 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 36 comments)
on Sunday, September 16, 2007 at 1:01:48 PM
I missed the possibility, but my wife pointed it out.
Maybe the object of buying the put options was actually to LOSE the money and feed it into the market to help prop it up a bit?
I know, I'm just grasping at straws, since I do believe Portland (or Eugene, slightly to the south) is a likely target for a false flag nuke attack. Though I was "happy" to hear that Silverstein bought the Sears Tower, as that gives Chicago a definite edge.
by
Charlie L (2 articles, 2 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 638 comments)
on Monday, September 17, 2007 at 12:25:18 AM
