Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (9 comments)

9/11 Qui Tam Jurisdictional Challenges Filed - 2/29/08

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 5 of 5 page(s)

opednews.com

Dr. Reynolds, has presented ample evidence, including reliance on expert analysis provided to Reynolds by retired pilot John Lear, son of LearJet founder Bill Lear, confirming that no planes hit the WTC on 9/11. Instead, the actual event is an example, on a much more sophisticated scale, of what Orson Welles did in 1938 in convincing many of a Martian invasion in his radio broadcast of "The War of the Worlds." John Lear focuses on the impossibility of the depicted speed of the aircraft, derived from fake video footage, the lack of training among the alleged hijackers, and the complete lack of any confirmed airplane parts as factors in his written analysis, filed with the court.

Dr. Reynolds' filings make reference to the frequently raised query "what about the passengers?" by noting, in part, that that query presupposes facts not shown to exist.

In short, NCSTAR 1 is a fraud and the defendants who participated in its preparation and lent their prestige to it are participants in a cover-up of what happened to the Twin Towers on 9/11. The evidence substantiates the claim that the World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weapons. The cleanup of the aftereffects is still ongoing and may pose a significant danger to the public. Because of that contamination, Dr. Wood asserts that it is unwise to construct any skyscrapers on the site, let alone a 1776ft tower.

END

Note:

Because the cases are ongoing, the clients, Dr. Wood and Dr. Reynolds are instructed not to comment further than that contained above. Queries can be directed to Attorney Leaphart.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

http://physicalevidenceof911.home.mchsi.com

Assisting in the research of 9/11 since 2006. Only physical evidence observable through pictures or measurement data should be considered to determine what happened at all three sites. Hearsay and unsupported hypotheses must be dismissed and (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

More Information by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:35:45 PM
Even More Information... by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:59:17 PM
Corrected Link to WTC Task Force Interviews by RuGBYZHG on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:21:14 PM
Correction to my correction by RuGBYZHG on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:27:30 PM
Proper Embed by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:27:49 PM
parts of the problem by gravity32 on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:33:33 AM
People With Limited Thinking Often Don't See It. by CB Brooklyn on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:48:50 AM
Just WHO is Gravity32? by Andrew Johnson on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 5:17:43 PM
Best of Luck... by Shallel on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:41:16 PM