9/11 Qui Tam Jurisdictional Challenges Filed - 2/29/08

One of the defendants in the two cases, SAIC, is thought to be in charge of security, and thus may control access to the site, to this very day.

Dr. Reynolds, has presented ample evidence, including reliance on expert analysis provided to Reynolds by retired pilot John Lear, son of LearJet founder Bill Lear, confirming that no planes hit the WTC on 9/11. Instead, the actual event is an example, on a much more sophisticated scale, of what Orson Welles did in 1938 in convincing many of a Martian invasion in his radio broadcast of "The War of the Worlds." John Lear focuses on the impossibility of the depicted speed of the aircraft, derived from fake video footage, the lack of training among the alleged hijackers, and the complete lack of any confirmed airplane parts as factors in his written analysis, filed with the court.

Dr. Reynolds' filings make reference to the frequently raised query "what about the passengers?" by noting, in part, that that query presupposes facts not shown to exist.

In short, NCSTAR 1 is a fraud and the defendants who participated in its preparation and lent their prestige to it are participants in a cover-up of what happened to the Twin Towers on 9/11. The evidence substantiates the claim that the World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weapons. The cleanup of the aftereffects is still ongoing and may pose a significant danger to the public. Because of that contamination, Dr. Wood asserts that it is unwise to construct any skyscrapers on the site, let alone a 1776ft tower.

END

Note:

Because the cases are ongoing, the clients, Dr. Wood and Dr. Reynolds are instructed not to comment further than that contained above. Queries can be directed to Attorney Leaphart.

 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5