Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Valuable 5   Well Said 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 8/28/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (15 comments)

The CIA's Role in the Origin and Maintenance of America's Overclass

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (95 fans)   -- Page 5 of 12 page(s)

opednews.com

American multinational corporations have built up colossal interests all over the world, and you can bet your ass that wherever you find U.S. business interests, you will also find the CIA. The multinational corporations want a peaceful status quo in countries where they have investments, because that gives them undisturbed access to cheap raw materials, cheap labor and stable markets for their finished goods. The status quo suits bankers, because their money remains secure, and multiplies. And, of course, the status quo suits the small ruling groups the CIA supports abroad, because all they want is to keep themselves on top of the socioeconomic pyramid and the majority of their people on the bottom. But do you realize what being on the bottom means in most parts of the world? Ignorance, poverty, often early death by starvation or disease"

Remember, the CIA is an instrument of the President; it only carries out policy. And, like everyone else, the President has to respond to forces in the society he's trying to lead? In America, the most powerful force is Big Business, and American Big Business has a vested interest in the Cold War."6

Domestic Recruitment

The CIA had no trouble recruiting the sons and daughters of the elites who sought a more exciting life. Between 1948 and 1959, more than 40,000 American individuals and companies acted as sources for the U.S. intelligence community.7Let's look at each area of recruitment, and see how they enabled the CIA to conduct its crimes:

Big Business and the CIA

The CIA co-opted big business right from the start, beginning with the most famous billionaire of the time, Howard Hughes. Hughes had inherited his father's million-dollar tool and die company at age 19. Anxious to expand his fortune, he made a conscientious decision "to go where the money is" -- namely, government. With a few well-placed bribes, Hughes secured defense contracts to build military planes. The result was the Hughes Aircraft company. By 1940, he had also acquired a controlling interest in Trans World Airlines. His government connections and international airline soon caught the attention of the CIA, and the two began a lifelong relationship. Hughes, whom the CIA dubbed "The Stockbroker," became the agency's largest contractor. Not only did he let the CIA use his business firms as fronts, but he also funded countless CIA operations. Perhaps the most notorious was Operation Jennifer, an allegedly failed attempt to recover nuclear codes from a sunken Soviet submarine. Hughes' right-hand security man, Robert Maheu, was a CIA agent who at one time represented the CIA in negotiations with the Mafia to assassinate Fidel Castro.

The CIA's contacts with big business quickly spread. The agency showed a preference for international companies, public relations firms, media companies, law offices, banks, financiers and stockbrokers. The CIA didn't limit its activities to recruiting businessmen; sometimes the CIA bought or created entire companies outright. One benefit of co-opting big business was that the CIA was able to create a secret source of funds other than from government. With stock portfolios multiplying their profits, it's impossible now to say just how flush the CIA really is. If Congress ever cut off funds for a mission, the business fraternity could easily replace them, either by donations or even by setting up profitable businesses in the target country. In fact, this is precisely what happened during the Iran/Contra scandal.

By allying itself with the business community, the CIA received the funds and thus the ability it needed to remove itself from democratic oversight and control.

The Media and the CIA

Journalism is a perfect cover for CIA agents. People talk freely to journalists, and few think suspiciously of a journalist aggressively searching for information. Journalists also have power, influence and clout. Not surprisingly, the CIA began a mission in the late 1940s to recruit American journalists on a wide scale, a mission it dubbed Operation MOCKINGBIRD. The agency wanted these journalists not only to relay any sensitive information they discovered, but also to write anti-communist, pro-capitalist propaganda when needed.

The instigators of MOCKINGBIRD were Frank Wisner, Allan Dulles, Richard Helms and Philip Graham. Graham was the husband of Katherine Graham, the former publisher of the Washington Post. In fact, it was the Post's ties to the CIA that allowed it to grow so quickly after the war, both in readership and influence.8

MOCKINGBIRD was extraordinarily successful. In no time, the agency had recruited at least 25 media organizations to disseminate CIA propaganda. At least 400 journalists would eventually join the CIA payroll, according to the CIA's testimony before a stunned Church Committee in 1975. (The committee felt the true number was considerably higher.) The names of those recruited reads like a Who's Who of journalism:

Philip and Katharine Graham (Publishers, Washington Post)

William Paley (President, CBS)

Henry Luce (Publisher, Time and Life magazine)

Arthur Hays Sulzberger (Publisher, N.Y. Times)

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Investigate the CIA

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://www.TechEditingServices.com

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've always (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

More info about author Steve Kangas and his alleged murderer by Richard Clark on Saturday, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:06:13 AM
Who killed Steve Kangas and why? And why was it covered up? by Richard Clark on Saturday, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:26:11 AM
A Timeline of CIA Atrocities, by Steve Kangas by Richard Clark on Saturday, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:23:55 PM
More questions about the strange death of author SteveKangas by Richard Clark on Saturday, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:55:52 PM
Well Done by Tim Fleming on Saturday, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:01:41 PM
CIA needs to be Closed Down by Starla Immak on Saturday, Aug 29, 2009 at 2:37:42 PM
Steve's "Liberalism Resurgent" webpage by Perry Logan on Sunday, Aug 30, 2009 at 6:01:48 AM
The CIA Needs To Be Torn Into A Million Pieces! by William Cormier on Sunday, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:48:25 AM
Good article... but... by Techknowledgie on Sunday, Aug 30, 2009 at 4:50:34 PM
A truly amazing article! by Jere Hough on Sunday, Aug 30, 2009 at 4:56:04 PM
Footnotes to the Kangas article by Richard Clark on Sunday, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:17:02 PM
The Central Bankers did it by Patrick on Monday, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:16:06 AM
A bit simplistic by Peter Duveen on Tuesday, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:28:20 PM
Why CIA director Casey had to be silenced by Richard Clark on Thursday, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:23:02 AM
For those who may not remember . . by Richard Clark on Thursday, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:30:47 AM