OpEdNews - Page 5 of Article: Nutrasweet Afflicted Family

As Dr. Bowen said: this is mass poisoning of the world. Aspartame
destroys the brain, the optic nerve, the immune system and central
nervous system. It devastates every organ of the body. Epidemic
obesity, diabetes, sexual dysfunction, retinopathy and neuropathy,
optic nerve destruction, convulsions and insulin reactions, MS,
Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, IQ depreciation and dozens of other
afflictions have been inflicted upon us by this deadly neurotoxic
carcinogenic "sweetener".

According to the prestigious Ecologist, aspartame was listed with the
pentagon in an inventory of prospective biochemical warfare weapons
submitted to Congress.
<http://www.mpwhi.com/ecologist_september_2005.pdf>http://www.mpwhi.com/ecologist_september_2005.pdf

Studies show the horrific damage done to the body. For instance, the Trocho Study shows the formaldehyde converted from the free methyl alcohol actually embalms tissue and damages DNA.
<http://www.mpwhi.com/formaldehyde_from_aspartame.pdf>http://www.mpwhi.com/formaldehyde_from_aspartame.pdf

Here are summaries of the two aspartame studies, Ramazzini, that
showed aspartame to be a multipotential carcinogen, passed down
through the mother:

DR. MORANDO SOFFRITTI, lead researcher on two groundbreaking
long-term aspartame studies. He was recently honored at New York's Mt Sinai School of Medicine with the Irving J Selikoff Award For his
outstanding contributions to the identification of environmental and
industrial carcinogens and his promotion of independent scientific
research. Reviewing his two impeccable aspartame studies. Dr.
Soffritti explains:

The first ERF study (2005) was conducted on 1800 Sprague-Dawley rats (100-150/per sex/per group) In order to simulate daily human intake, aspartame was added to the standard rat diet in quantities of 5000, 2500, 100, 500, 20, 4, and 0 mg/Kg of body weight. Treatment of the animals began at 8 weeks of age and continued until spontaneous death. The results show that APM causes a statistically significant, dose-related increase of lymphomas/leukemias and malignant tumors of the renal pelvis in females and malignant tumors of peripheral nerves in males. These results demonstrate for the first time that APM is a carcinogenic agent, capable of inducing malignancies at various dose levels, including those lower than the current acceptable daily intake (ADI) for humans (50 mg/kg of body weight in the US, 40 mg/kg of body weight in the EU).

The second ERF study (2007) was conducted on 400 Sprague-Dawley rats (70-95/per sex/per group). In order to simulate daily human intake, aspartame was added to the standard rat diet in quantities of 100, 20, and 0 mg/Kg of body weight. Treatment of the animals began on the 12th day of fetal life until natural death. The results of the second study show an increased incidence of lymphomas/leukemias in female rats with respect to the first study. Moreover, the study shows that when lifespan exposure to APM begins during fetal life, the age at which lymphomas/leukemias develop in females is anticipated. For the
first time, a statistically significant increase in mammary cancers
in females was also observed in the second study. The results of this
transplacental carcinogenicity bioassay not only confirm, but also
reinforce the first experimental demonstration of APMs multipotential
carcinogenicity.

Over six years ago I petitioned the FDA to ban aspartame. The FDA has 180 days to answer it. They refuse, obviously because I'm using
their own words, and they don't know how to get around the fact that
everything is a matter of record. If it wasn't so criminal one
would have to laugh at their propaganda - the idea that someone might even consider believing them. For instance, they will tell you there is just a small amount of methanol, and there is more in
oranges. What they don't say is that in oranges that it is
accompanied by ethanol which is the classic antidote for methanol
toxicity and takes it out of your body safely. Here is a peer
reviewed journal article about it.
<http://www.mpwhi.com/aspartame_methanol_and_public_health.pdf>http://www.mpwhi.com/aspartame_methanol_and_public_health.pdf

Methanol also binds to pectin. In aspartame there is no ethanol. Here is their basic propaganda answered with references:
<http://dorway.com/dorwblog/?page_id=606>http://dorway.com/dorwblog/?page_id=606

A detox formula for aspartame victims endorsed by Dr. Russell Blaylock, Neurosurgeon:
<http://www.wnho.net.wtdaspartame.htm/>http://www.wnho.net.wtdaspartame.htm
Available are his excellent books and a CD :"The Truth About Aspartame"

There are efforts now in states and countries to rid the planet of aspartame. It is genetically engineered. The manufacturers are get people in high places addicted. When I testified to the Senate in New Mexico, half the senators were sipping Diet Coke. Presidents Clinton and Bush were addicted. Methanol is classified as a narcotic, it causes chronic methanol poisoning. This effects the dopamine system of the brain producing addiction.

I've lectured in other countries and I can tell you people are sick
and dying the world over on this poison. It would be great to see it
banned from California. First of all its illegally on the market
because it violates the Delaney Amendment. Here are comments from an FDA toxicologist, Dr. Adrian Gross, to Congress on 8/1/85:

Dr. Gross testified that at least one of Searle's studies "has
established beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT that aspartame is capable of inducing brain tumors in experimental animals and that this
predisposition of it is of extremely high significance. ... In view
of these indications that the cancer causing potential of aspartame
is a matter that had been established WAY BEYOND ANY REASONABLE
DOUBT, one can ask: What is the reason for the apparent refusal by
the FDA to invoke for this food additive the so-called Delaney
Amendment to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act?"

The Delaney Amendment makes it illegal to allow any residues of
cancer causing chemicals in foods. In his concluding testimony Gross
asked, "Given the cancer causing potential of aspartame how would the FDA justify its position that it views a certain amount of aspartame as constituting an allowable daily intake or 'safe' level of it? Is that position in effect not equivalent to setting a 'tolerance' for
this food additive and thus a violation of that law? And if the FDA
itself elects to violate the law, who is left to protect the health
of the public?" Congressional Record SID835:131 (August 1, l985)

Here is my letter to the Assembly Committee on Health which exposes
the fact that it's adulterated:
<http://www.mpwhi.com/letter_to_a_n_kim_california_ach.htm>http://www.mpwhi.com/letter_to_a_n_kim_california_ach.htm

The adulteration means it violates interstate commerce laws.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Nutrasweet Afflicted Family - brain tumor, ALS, seizures