54 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 15 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

New Lamps for Old

By       (Page 5 of 12 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments
Message David Petrovich

Its long-anticipated repeal set into motion a conspiracy that included cooperation and participation by major finance corporations in the early 1990s. In 1997, an electronic registry for mortgage loans named Mortgage Electronic Registration System, or MERS for short, was launched and worked its way into the center of the mortgage loan-securitization scheme.

Subsequently, a Federal Bankruptcy Court ruled the MERS business model illegal.

From Huffpo Business: "There have been numerous court rulings against MERS -- including decisions made by state supreme courts. What is significant about the US Bankruptcy Court of New York's ruling is that the judge specifically set out to examine the legality of MERS's business model. As the judge argued in the decision, 'The Court believes this analysis is necessary for the precedential effect it will have on other cases pending before this Court.' In the scathing opinion, Judge Grossman variously labeled MERS's positions as 'stunningly inconsistent' with the facts, 'absurd, at best,' and 'not supported by the law.' The ruling is a complete repudiation of every argument MERS has made about the legality of its procedures."

Though regulations on Wall Street and its financial transactions were greatly relaxed, an equally important set of rules and regulations, known as the Uniform Commercial Code, remained.

From Duke Law: "The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), a comprehensive code addressing most aspects of commercial law, is generally viewed as one of the most important developments in American law. The UCC text and draft revisions are written by experts in commercial law and submitted as drafts for approval to the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (referred to as the Uniform Law Commissioners), in collaboration with the American Law Institute. The Commissioners are all attorneys, qualified to practice law, including state and federal judges, legislators and law professors from throughout the United States and its territories. These quasi-public organizations meet and decide whether to endorse these drafts or to send them back to the experts for revision. The revision process may result in several different revisions of the original draft. Once a draft is endorsed, the Uniform Law Commissioners recommend that the states adopt these rules.

"The UCC is a model code, so it does not have legal effect in a jurisdiction unless UCC provisions are enacted by the individual state legislatures as statutes. Currently, the UCC (in whole or in part) has been enacted, with some local variation, in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands."

Why is the Uniform Commercial Code important? Because no matter what shenanigans and shortcuts to quick profit cooked up by the conspirators, whatever documents they devised, and whatever three-ring-circus assignment procedure was used, they still has to adhere to the umbrella of Uniform Commercial Code Section 3 - Negotiable Instruments.

But the Wall Street wiz kids' plan paid too little attention to that pesky Uniform Commercial Code. It's almost as if they felt the law did not exist or would not apply to them. After all, it's common knowledge that the financial regulatory agencies are largely staffed by former Wall Streeters who are still friendly/loyal to their former pals.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

David Petrovich Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Executive Director: Society For Preservation of Continued Homeownership (SPOCH), a 501c3 tax exempt, charitable and educational consumer advocacy.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Wall Street's Achilles Heel may be hidden in plain sight

Foreclosure Crises Needs Private-Public Programs

Eminent Domain - a Gift Horse or Trojan Horse?

New Lamps for Old

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend