Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   Well Said 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 2/3/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (64 comments)

Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Official Slams War on Terror and Questions 9/11

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (3 fans)   -- Page 5 of 5 page(s)

opednews.com

Continuity of government is about protecting the established leadership, or making sure that leadership continues. Continuity of government means that, within the specific framework, there is a way for any group of characters to run any set of responsibilities.

If continuity of government had been implemented during the Bush administration, Bush and Cheney would be missing.

After I discussed a Washington Post article from 2002 stating that Cheney went into hiding for months after 9/11 because COG plans were implemented, Arnold responded as follows.

That's what is supposed to happen in those circumstances.

In other words, Arnold is saying that COG is all about making sure someone is around to run the government, and hiding some government employees is the way to do that, and nothing sinister.

I then argued that the fact that DeFazio and the entire Homeland Security Committee of the U.S. Congress asked the White House to disclose COG plans, and the White House refused, showed that something nefarious was being done with respect to COG.


The White House was overcautious about it. But DeFazio's public request was a political gesture intended to embarrass leadership . . . that was a mistake. If they had simply picked up the phone and asked, they would have gotten the information.

The Bush administration leadership tried to usurp power. They went around the FISA court, and did a lot of other things that went too far. But that had nothing to with COG.

I then stated that many people believed that Bush was not the real leader, but simply a figurehead, and that a shadow government had actually run things during the Bush years.

It may be true that there was a shadow government. But that had nothing to do with COG.

Postscript: I believe that Arnold is one of the "good guys" - someone who spent many years in government, is trying to do the right thing. There are obviously bad people in government. But there are also many good current and former government people. See this. You can't always judge a book by its cover, and you never know where you will find allied in the struggle for truth, justice and security.

* Arnold is the author
, co-author, or editor of the following books: Fighting Back: Winning the War Against Terrorism (1986), Beyond the Iran-Contra Crisis : The Shape of U. S. Anti-Terrorism Policy in the Post-Reagan Era (1988), The Violence Formula: Why People Lend Sympathy and Support to Terrorism (1990), Think About Terrorism: The New Warfare (1991), and A World Less Safe: Essays on Conflict in the 21st Century (2005).

Big hat tip to Alan Miller of Patriots Question 9/11 who discovered Arnold's essay, summarized Arnold's biographical information, and brought Arnold to my attention.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

George Washington


As a political activist for decades, I have rejoiced in victories for the people and mourned in defeats. I chose the pen name "George Washington" because - as (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
64 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Thank you George by William Whitten on Tuesday, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:37:19 PM
Nice Work GW, by Mike Baldwin on Tuesday, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:45:15 PM
A thought for non-conspiracy folks by Perry Logan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:13:05 AM
Dear Mr. Troll ... your logic again is as vapid as all your by Mr M on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:28:18 AM
Logan, Logan, Logan by Anti Vigilante on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:10:45 PM
When did Bush by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:06:16 PM
Thanks for the link, Perry by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:29:01 PM
Alburry by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:40:10 PM
Military Intel assets must be well paid for their time. by Richard Lee on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:53:13 PM
There's no law against ignorance, by albury smith on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:08:14 AM
Obama's a political realist and opportunist. (Kucinich and by Richard Lee on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:29:16 PM
Your worst enemy by albury smith on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:10:02 PM
Great Theory by David Ryan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:09:33 PM
Thanks for the link Perry... by David Ryan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:29:19 PM
no is yes no? by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:29:16 PM
Lets Not Get Too Rational by arlen custer on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:58:49 PM
No Faked Evidence? by George Washington on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:03:43 PM
Nice job of mangling the truth, by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:37:16 PM
So you're saying by George Washington on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:42:00 PM
No, "George," by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:16:34 PM
Question by George Washington on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:57:47 PM
Your "experts" by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:09:53 PM
Your link by David Ryan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:26:17 PM
Great Point Albury by David Ryan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:32:41 PM
Experts in their fields... by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:00:41 PM
Aircraft Accident Investigator for US Air force by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:05:45 PM
Lt. Col. US Marine Corps Fighter Pilot by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:16:26 PM
Lt Col. US Air Force Fighter Pilot Aerospace Engineer by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:28:58 PM
Nice spamfest, by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:46:11 PM
Heres the situation hat shot: by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:17:31 PM
Reality check, "hat shot" by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:34:48 PM
Pilot who actually flew two of the actual planes by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:11:17 PM
Former NORAD Officer by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:15:11 PM
Military Historian, US Army War College by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:23:57 PM
Able Danger by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:28:23 PM
So all bury you chew on these awhile... by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:37:28 PM
You are Failing your quiz all bury.......... by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:44:49 PM
Civil Engineer & Fire Protection Engineer by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:52:56 PM
all bury by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:29:04 PM
"inadequaite [sic] and irrelivant [sic]" by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:26:45 PM
Actually it does sound rational by David Ryan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:37:57 PM
You mean no government paycheck this month? by Richard Lee on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:42:45 PM
No, I don't recall that memo, by albury smith on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:23:46 AM
all bury, you are not keeping up! by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:01:42 PM
Live TV Coverage by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:12:02 PM
Which building? by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:34:56 PM
No explosives in the WTC? by David Ryan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:55:00 PM
Why are you asking William? by David Ryan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:58:44 PM
jet fuel/kerosene by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:23:40 PM
What a bunch of crap by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:57:43 PM
Demolitions Expert by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:37:43 PM
LOL by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:59:01 PM
Nice talking to ya... by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:06:49 PM
albury by arlen custer on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:09:34 PM
Here are some legitimate questions for you, by albury smith on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:06:29 PM
albury you are truly something. But what? by arlen custer on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:14:36 AM
The last place you want to go by albury smith on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:42:29 AM
How much time will I waste on You? by arlen custer on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:10:12 PM
It never ceases to amaze me by albury smith on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:23:47 PM
My Last Word To All You Official Theororists by arlen custer on Saturday, Feb 7, 2009 at 12:22:04 PM
Frank A. DeMartini by Aurora on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:15:54 PM
Leslie E. Robertson by albury smith on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:31:23 PM
More than 660 Engineers and Architects by Aurora on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:24:22 PM
Apparently so... by David Ryan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:03:46 PM