![]() |
By Steve Windisch (jibbguy) (about the author) Page 5 of 7 page(s)
jibbguy: What free energy or highly efficient devices or specific technologies do you think have the best chance to “break out” into the mainstream in the next year or two? Ashtweth Palise: Every technology listed on our R & D principles pages can solve the energy crisis. (http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/randdprinciples.htm ). However you cannot breakout by simply having a working device. We have compiled an extensive up-to-date example of how proprietary inventors with "free energy" technology went wrong ( http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/howtheywentwrong.htm ). You can see from this page how inventors who have free energy devices, including 100% water powered engines and many more have simply become a victim to political and economic conditions, business incompetence, paranoia, and their own self interests. Without a certain validation process they will always fail. Currently they are fighting their own greed, ignorance of the device by the mainstream faculties (due to the inventors method of disclosure) and a multi-trillion dollar oil industry. If that wasn't enough there is no legal security for them. For example: A company can simply buy the technology and shelve it (this has already happened) from the public forcing them to pay for fossil fuels. There is no law preventing any corporation from doing this. There is also the unregulated military industrial complex who can simply use the legal secrecy act, re possess their patent and technology and further legally prevent the inventor from talking about the invention. Again no legal defense in this regard. I could mention hydroxy, cold fusion, I could mention magnetic motors, I could mention radiant energy devices…. In fact I can state now that John Bedini has a 10KW home power radiant energy system. This was featured in the “Energy From The Vacuum” series. This like many technologies, could "break out now". The technology is already here but the avenue to disseminate it is not. John Bedini produced a 10 Kw radiant energy system to power a house, yet when they asked him on public record in the documentary, “would you sell this?”, he stated “No”. John has already stated publicly that he has been threatened. His hands are tied. Why did he answer “No”?
We must not give the impression that free energy devices conventionally have a chance to "breakout" or the majority of which need to still be developed for a chance to break out. These devices are here, they have been here since the time of Nikola Tesla. (1800's).Over 400 Former High Level Government and Military Officials, Pilots, NORAD, and NASA employees can also testify to the military industrial complex being part of concealing “zero point” energy -related technology from the public. They did not think of the electro –gravitic, anti gravity propulsion systems by themselves: They had to conceal recovered UFO craft and hide it all from the public.
If the over 400, yes that's over 400 Former High Level Government and Military Officials and Pilots evidence of this is not enough, Ben Rich the former head of Lockheed’s “Skunk Works” which developed the B-2 Stealth Bomber stated, and I quote:
"We already have the means to traverse the stars but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an act of god to ever get them out to benefit humanity.. Any thing you can imagine we already know how to do.”
– End quote, Ben Rich the former head of Lockheed “Skunk Works”. We have legal petitions to address this issue at http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/disclosureproject.htm .
So my friend its not a technology race, its a WAR on you the people by corporate interests to dumb you down and suppress the truth. if we left out the open source engineers, the independent efforts of documentary makers and the Panacea concept of having a secure Research and Development Center in the public eye, our needed signed petitions to counter all this, the public would have grim skewed perceptions of what is here and continues to be suppressed. Governments have failed to deliver enough supportive and secure infrastructure to harbor this technology and secure it. The media is no better.
For example, the “Myth Busters” TV show have given the impression that the Bedini and hydroxy technologies do not work. There is evidence of deliberate suppression not only from oil cartels, the military industrial complex (For example the disclosureproject.org), banks (for example Lindsey Williams evidence), but also the mainstream media. I can speak personally on his issues as I have experienced it from them. We asked some very pertinent questions on the “Myth Busters” forums, why they had left out key replication information on the Bedini technology, and also if they wished to test our replication themselves. There was no answer. As soon as we stated that we were going to get an accredited third party faculty to validate our replication, our thread was pulled from public view. We have this thread saved for the public record.
As for the hydroxy research, they have also done a similar (what we construe as deliberate) "take" on hydroxy boosters. They not only produced a poor replication to give you the impression this technology is flawed (like they did with the Bedini technology), they also neglected to mention the numerous scientific tests by faculties and patents showing the clear and concise benefits of using hydroxy technology with an internal combustion engine. The average Joe sees only this skew, and gets manipulated. This cannot happen to such a capacity if Panacea received enough grants to erect a physical Center in the public eye. We have compiled an extensive example of how we could perform a public service by doing this and how we could benefit the already active organizations and individuals working on similar goals (http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/researchanddevelopment.htm ) .
jibbguy: Tell us what you would like to see done ultimately with the Rotoverter, where you would like to see this technology go in the future?
Ashtweth Palise: Grants for the open source RV engineers. But first the implementation of the RV into peoples lives who can use the energy saving capacity. Solar work shops using the prime mover concept. Solar water pumps, any application where typically you could not run a solar application feasibly and economically with out using the energy saving Rotoverter principle. Also further R & D done. Currently Dr. Peter Lindemann has suggested we consult Eric Dollard and ask him to apply his “4 Quadrant” theory towards the RV's overunity research. Peter Lindemann is a largely unknown free energy researcher by the mainstream faculties but a very respected scientist in the free energy communities. He has stated that Eric could have the answers to extract 95% of reactive power through complex RLC systems.
Currently we know that the RV produces excess reactive power compared to the input watts needed to create it. However extraction of this is still needed to be perfected at this time. Since the RV produces a COP of 18 in reactive power, or basically for 340 watts you can create over a 1000VARS in circulating current, if Eric's proprietary system could extract 95% of that as claimed, it would give you a self powering system off the shelf free energy device. I would like to see Eric help.
Mean time our open source engineers are working around the clock to crack the code. What I would like to see now is farmers and others using the energy saving capacity of the RV. This is something we have gone to great length to prove. Water pumps, drill and generators can all be optimized. This research is listed in our on line university.
jibbguy: How would you advise new inventors of free energy devices.. What should they do to get their product into the marketplace successfully?
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 4 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |