Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend (7 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

Life Arts

Educating the Next Generation

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 5 of 12 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Touching 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 7/2/12

Become a Fan
  (68 fans)
- Advertisement -

Emmanuelle: Why a satellite orbit?

Bill: Well, there are only so many places in the sky"

Emmanuelle: Yes, I agree with you but who is the recipient of the money that is being given by the satellite company"

Bill: Oh, the government that gives"

Emmanuelle: But which government"because right now it's up in Space"

Bill: Well, I guess it's the American government that gave it to them.

Scott: It's an international body" (See: International Institute of Space Law - http://iislweb.org/index.html)

Bill: But they voted"

- Advertisement -

Scott: It's like shipping lanes".there are space lanes.   There are certain orbits that are staked out by certain satellites.   So you can't put another satellite in the path of an America satellite.   So, they own that geo-synchronous orbit.   So those are valuable spaces.   And it's becoming an even bigger problem because what's happening now is that debris is starting to fill up those lanes.   You know the satellites are starting to break apart or malfunction.   You know, China blew one up a few years ago, which meant there were actually more "satellites" because they blew it into pieces.  

Timothy: Why did they blow it up?

Scott: To test ".well, that's another controversial thing"they were testing an anti-ballistic missile system, which of course got America all excited because we want to be the only ones to have that.  

Timothy: Oh, so they were testing an anti-satellite weapon?

Scott: Well, it was an anti-ballistic missile , but they blew up a satellite they didn't need anymore.   So now these pieces of space junk are flying up there and they're very hard to keep track of.   And at the speed they move up there a little fragment can destroy a satellite"

- Advertisement -

Bill: or destroy a spaceship"

Scott: Yeah, or even a space station". The danger is there is so much floating around up there that there's no space left.   So we should be charging for the congestion up there.   Somebody should be paying for taking that space to the community"which I guess in this case is all of Earth.  

Timothy: Nobody should own Space.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12

 

http://newthinking.blogspot.com/

Scott Baker is a Managing Editor & The Economics Editor at Opednews, and a blogger for Huffington Post, Daily Kos, and Global Economic Intersection.

His anthology of updated Opednews articles "America is Not Broke" was published by Tayen Lane Publishing (March, 2015) and may be found here:
http://www.americaisnotbroke.net/

Scott is President of Common Ground-NYC (http://commongroundnyc.org/), a Geoist/Georgist activist group. He has written dozens (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Obama Explains the FEMA Camps

Was Malaysian Flight MH370 Landed Safely in Afghanistan?

Let the Sun Shine on a State Bank in Florida

Batman, The Dark Knight Rises...and Occupy Wall Street Falls

The Least Productive People in the World

The continuing plight of Malaysian Flight MH370 - 2 month update

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Nice Job. There is no explanation so clear as ... by Thomas Brown on Monday, Jul 2, 2012 at 1:31:38 PM
by Charles Einstein. He argues similarly, but also... by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:36:58 PM