Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   5 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
Life Arts

5 to 4-One More Vote To Tyranny

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 12/26/08

Become a Fan
  (45 fans)
- Advertisement -

Cheney hints that one more vote was needed on the Supreme Court to fully implement the absolute powers of his unitary executive George W. Bush.

Cheney also argued that the President's wartime powers trump laws passed by Congress.

"The Congress has -- clearly has the ability to write statutes and has certain constitutional authorities granted in the Constitution," Cheney said. "But I would argue that they do not have the right by statute to alter presidential constitutional power. In other words, you can't override his constitutional authorities and responsibilities with a statute."

Cheney's chief regret appeared to be that the U.S. Supreme Court narrowly rejected the administration's argument that these presidential powers allowed Bush to ignore fundamental individual rights incorporated in the Constitution, such as the writ of habeas corpus, an ancient legal principle requiring a government to show cause for imprisoning a person.

"I think that, frankly, the basic decision they (the Supreme Court justices) made was wrong," Cheney said. "But it's their authority. The vote was 5-4."

In other words, Cheney was suggesting that the replacement of one more justice from the court's moderate wing by the likes of John Roberts or Samuel Alito – Bush's two appointees – would have swung the Supreme Court into a historic reinterpretation of the Constitution.

- Advertisement -

Essentially, such a Supreme Court would have made the President all powerful and eliminated the founding U.S. principle of "unalienable rights" for individuals, protected by a government based on checks and balances.

Under that new paradigm – of an endless "war on terror" and an Executive who decides whether someone is or is not an "enemy combatant" – the key pillars of the American Republic would have been in ruins.

Instead of a Republic in which citizens possessed fundamental liberties enshrined in the Constitution – as the Founders envisioned – Americans would become, in effect, subjects to a monarchical President, who would apportion – or deny – freedoms as he would see fit, click here           

- Advertisement -


Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Support Immediate Impeachment Proceedings

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Lance Ciepiela is a retired senior who had an interesting career in government service - a United States Marine Corps (USMC) Vietnam-Era veteran, who became interested in restoring the Constitution after I realized that W Bush had attacked Iraq (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

9/11-Last Man Out

A War Crimes Trial - Bush Jr/Blair

End [Their Federal Reserve System = An Exclusive Banking Cartel]

9/11 - Larry Silverstein Said "Pull It" and Three Towers Fell That Day

WTC 7 Explosions Witness-Barry Jennings

The 3rd Anti-Christ of Nostradamus


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Cheney, along with Karl Rove came so close to tota... by Ginger Hastings Chapman on Friday, Dec 26, 2008 at 2:04:57 AM
Anybody think an Obama Administration is going to ... by FAITHCARR on Friday, Dec 26, 2008 at 8:43:46 AM
Well Faith....LolIf history is any example (anybod... by William Whitten on Friday, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:11:15 AM
In a too-close-for-comfort 5-4 ruling, the Court r... by Lance Ciepiela on Saturday, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:27:39 AM
Gene, for this well-focused report (& for the ... by kibitzer2 on Saturday, Dec 27, 2008 at 4:05:30 PM