![]() |
By ladybroadoak (about the author) Page 4 of 7 page(s)
Law enforcement is not unknown to falsely accuse the public of being engaged in "questionable" behavior, even though that activity is lawful. You may notice during a conversation with an InfraGard intelligence officer in law enforcement that they skip around, and are unable to focus on a single topic. They may insult you and imply that you are not willing to "care" about their "concern". In truth, they are not concerned about that issue, merely hoping to get you to react and respond to something.
Table C: Progress Indicators When Challenging InfraGard Abuses
- Calling InfraGard officers on their bluffs about "evidence"
- Challenging their inconsistencies
- Asking to see a lawyer
- Invoking your 5th Amendment right to silence
- Not discussing any personal information until your lawyer is there
- Asking for specific reasons why you are being stopped, detained, challenged, or questioned
- Asking the InfraGard contactor why they claim they are concerned about procedures, but they are not following those procedures
- Asking the InfraGard contractors to explain why they claim they are attempting to "protect" a resource, but the public record shows they are not fully meeting that standard
- Asking the InfraGard contractor why they use deception, lies, and false companies to gather information about people supporting unions, political candidates, or policies that contradict the company's board of directors
- Asking InfraGard personnel why they are afraid of unionization efforts
InfraGard officers have a challenging job: Protecting the nation's resources. However, they make their job more difficult when they abuse the public, especially those who might be inclined to risk providing valuable information and support.
InfraGard officers do not have clear disciplinary procedures. When there are reports of abuse or misconduct, these are typically explained away as "Officer discretion". The public needs know that InfraGard contractors and law enforcement have been abusing their authority. Oversight is needed.
Appendix 1: Oversight Issues of InfraGard
Congress and State Officials need to review and independently audit with real no-notice audits the following:
- To what extent InfraGard contractors have relied on law enforcement to engage in pretextual stops to collect information they are otherwise not entitled
Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
We demand information on Infragard Time to clear up this mess
Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 1 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |