Tags for This Article:

Congress 110th (536)  9 11 WTC Attack (502)  911 Truth (392)  9 11 Truth (337)  911 (275)  911 (236)  9 11 Lies (224)  9 11 Coverups (219)  9-11 (200)  911 Profiteers Political (193)  September 11 (129)  9 11 Profiteers $$ (102)  9 11 Victims (77)  9 11 Cleanup (38) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
February 14, 2008 at 16:19:58

People Who Question the Government's Version of 9/11 Are Not Credible, Right?

by George Washington     Page 4 of 7 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

A prominent physicist with 33 years of service for the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC (Dr. David L. Griscom) said that the official theory for why the Twin Towers and world trade center building 7 collapsed "does not match the available facts" and supports the theory that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition

A world-renowned scientist, recipient of the National Medal of Science, America's highest honor for scientific achievement (Dr. Lynn Margulis) said:

"I suggest that those of us aware and concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and impartial investigation be undertaken."
The former head of the Fire Science Division of the government agency which claims that the World Trade Centers collapsed due to fire (the National Institute of Standards and Technology), who is one of the world’s leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering (Dr. James Quintiere), called for an independent review of the World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. "I wish that there would be a peer review of this," he said, referring to the NIST investigation. "I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they've done; both structurally and from a fire point of view. ... I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable."

The principal electrical engineer for the entire World Trade Center complex, who was "very familiar with the structures and [the Twin Towers'] conceptual design parameters" (Richard F. Humenn), stated that "the mass and strength of the structure should have survived the localized damage caused by the planes and burning jet fuel . . . . the fuel and planes alone did not bring the Towers down."

Former Director for Research, Director for Aeronautical Projects, and Flight Research Program Manager for NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center, who holds masters degrees in both physics and engineering (Dwain A. Deets) says:

"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Centers on 9/11].''

A prominent physicist, former U.S. professor of physics from a top university, and a former principal investigator for the U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Advanced Energy Projects (Dr. Steven E. Jones) stated that the world trade centers were brought down by controlled demolition

A U.S. physics professor who teaches at several universities (Dr. Crockett Grabbe) believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition

An expert on demolition (Bent Lund) said that the trade centers were brought down with explosives (in Danish)

A Dutch demolition expert (Danny Jowenko) stated that WTC 7 was imploded

A safety engineer and accident analyst for the Finnish National Safety Technology Authority (Dr. Heikki Kurttila) stated regarding WTC 7 that "The great speed of the collapse and the low value of the resistance factor strongly suggest controlled demolition."

A 13-year professor of metallurgical engineering at a U.S. university, with a PhD in materials engineering, a former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment Senior Staff Member (Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn), is calling for a new investigation of 9/11

A Danish professor of chemistry (Dr. Niels Harrit) said, in a mainstream Danish newspaper, "WTC7 collapsed exactly like a house of cards. If the fires or damage in one corner had played a decisive role, the building would have fallen in that direction. You don't have to be a woodcutter to grasp this" (translated)

A former guidance systems engineer for Polaris and Trident missiles and professor emeritus, mathematics and computer science at a university concluded (Dr. Bruce R. Henry) that the Twin Towers "were brought down by planted explosives."

A mechanical engineer with 20 years experience as a Fire Protection Engineer for the U.S. Departments of Energy, Defense, and Veterans Affairs, who is a contributing Subject Matter Expert to the U.S. Department of Energy Fire Protection Engineering Functional Area Qualification Standard for Nuclear Facilities, a board member of the Northern California - Nevada Chapter of the Society of Fire Protection Engineers, currently serving as Fire Protection Engineer for the city of San Jose, California, the 10th largest city in the United States (Edward S. Munyak) believes that the World Trade Center was destroyed by controlled demolition.

The former Chief of the Strategic and Emergency Planning Branch, U.S. Department of Energy, and former Director of the Office of Engineering at the Public Service Commission in Washington, D.C., who is a mechanical engineer (Enver Masud) , does not believe the official story, and believes that there is a prima facie case for controlled demolition of the World Trade Center.

A professor of mathematics (Gary Welz) said "The official explanation that I've heard doesn't make sense because it doesn't explain why I heard and felt an explosion before the South Tower fell and why the concrete was pulverized"

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS

A prominent engineer with 55 years experience, in charge of the design of hundreds of major building projects including high rise offices, former member of the California Seismic Safety Commission and former member of the National Institute of Sciences Building Safety Council (Marx Ayres) believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition (see also this)

Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition (translation here)

Charles Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas (and see this)

Dennis Kollar, structural engineer, of West Bend, Wisconsin

 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

 

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/

George Washington

George Washington is a pen name. I am using the pen name, with the approval of the publisher, because I have received death threats due to my 9/11 research and writing. I am using a pen name to protect myself and my family.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments

Electrical Engineer
Harold SmithElectrical Engineer

You've actually had death threats???

I believe it. 

This network of 911 "debunkers" seems to be an organized, well-funded group of mostly hard-core ideologues. They've got fancy web sites and they clearly are putting a lot of time into the effort. (I'll tell ya, trying to convince people that up is down and right is wrong and that they basically can't trust their own eyes, etc., is a job I certainly wouldn't want).

Anyway, some of these "debunkers" have about them an air of desperation...and you can easily sense their anger and their hatred for "truthers". 

What scares me is that the conspirators (primarily a Cheney/Mossad arrangement I would guess) are probably feeling a little heat, and most likely don't like the idea of handing power over to another administration, e.g., that of Obama, if there's a finite risk of a real 911 investigation. Thus the 911 "truth movement" might have the paradoxical effect of increasing the odds of an attack on Iran (and thus possibly WW3), rather than decreasing the odds, as most of us would hope to do. 

 

by Harold Smith (0 articles, 3 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 450 comments) on Thursday, February 14, 2008 at 10:57:01 PM
 


Freelance photographer and writer living in Maine.
Stephen DemetriouFreelance photographer and writer living in Maine.

Clinton

If I recall correctly in Bill Clinton's well known interview with Chris Wallace, Clinton said the 911 Commission report was a political document. He said, "Now the 911 Commission was a political document too...."

click here

by Stephen Demetriou (6 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 181 comments) on Friday, February 15, 2008 at 7:39:18 AM
 


Hater of Nazis above all. Hobbies include activism, military model building, military history, exciting and vital conversation with retired crooks. Retired
John HanksHater of Nazis above all. Hobbies include activism, military model building, military history, exciting and vital conversation with retired crooks. Retired

No physical cowardice allowed.

I have had some face to face and anonymous threats.  I have had my car spray painted by crooks.  If you are not willing to take a chance on your life, you do not have enough of the hatred that you need to stand up the Nazi filth.  Besides, chances are that the crooks who think they run this country have terrible plans for everyone, not just you.  So,, enjoy the sting of battle.  Continue to afflict the comfortable and comfort the afflicted.

by John Hanks (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1103 comments) on Friday, February 15, 2008 at 12:37:03 PM
 

 

3 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Anne Kilkenny Full Email on Sarah Palin by Rady Ananda

John McCain: Morally, Mentally, and Emotionally Unfit by Jim Fetzer

Iran War ~ How It Will Unfold by Lord Stirling

High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's Theory Falls Apart by Len Hart

Librarians Against Palin Founder a Mystery by Judy Swindler

Sarah Palin, A Wolf in Moose Clothing by Anthony Wade

Protester who interrupted McCain's speech is an Iraq War Veteran by Mary MacElveen

Did Sarah Palin REALLY call Barack Obama "Sambo"? by syQodem

Is McCain Campaign Interfering In Alaska Troopergate Investigation of Palin? by Rob Kall

Why We're Planning to Prosecute Cheney and Bush by David Swanson

Popularity Navigation
Control Panel:

Select Time
6 hrs 12 hrs
1 Day 2 Days
3 Days 1 Week
2 Weeks 1 Month
2 Months 3 Months
6 Months Last Year
Select Content
Articles Diaries
Polls Events
All Op-Eds
News Life/Arts/Science
Select Popularity
Page Views
# of Comments
Recommend Emails
  

Go To Top 50 Most Popular