Tag(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (22 comments)

9/11 Email

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (3 fans)   -- Page 4 of 7 page(s)

opednews.com

A former guidance systems engineer for Polaris and Trident missiles and professor emeritus, mathematics and computer science at a university concluded (Dr. Bruce R. Henry) that the Twin Towers "were brought down by planted explosives."

A professor of mathematics (Gary Welz) said "The official explanation that I've heard doesn't make sense because it doesn't explain why I heard and felt an explosion before the South Tower fell and why the concrete was pulverized"

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS

A prominent engineer with 55 years experience, in charge of the design of hundreds of major building projects including high rise offices, former member of the California Seismic Safety Commission and former member of the National Institute of Sciences Building Safety Council (Marx Ayres) believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition (see also this)

Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition (translation here)

Charles Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas (and see this)

Dennis Kollar, structural engineer, of West Bend, Wisconsin

Doyle Winterton, structural engineer (retired)


Haluk Akol, Structural Engineer and architect (ret.)

William Rice, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont Technical College

An architect, member of the American Institute of Architects, who has been a practicing architect for 20 years and has been responsible for the production of construction documents for numerous steel-framed and fire-protected buildings for uses in many different areas, including education, civic, rapid transit and industrial use (Richard Gage) disputes the claim that fire and airplane damage brought down the World Trade Centers and believes there is strong evidence of controlled demolition (many other architects who question 9/11 are listed here)

LEGAL SCHOLARS

Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S. Army Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media commentator on terrorism and intelligence services (John Loftus) questions the government's version of 9/11.

Former Inspector General, U.S. Department of Transportation; former Professor of Aviation, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering and Aviation and Professor of Public Policy, Ohio State University (Mary Schiavo) questions the government's version of 9/11.

Professor of International Law at the University of Illinois, Champaign; a leading practitioner and advocate of international law; responsible for drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, the American implementing legislation for the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention; served on the Board of Directors of Amnesty International (1988-1992), and represented Bosnia- Herzegovina at the World Court, with a Doctor of Law Magna Cum Laude as well as a Ph.D. in Political Science, both from Harvard University (Dr.
Francis Boyle) questions the government's version of 9/11.

Former prosecutor in the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section of the U.S. Justice Department and a key member of Attorney General Bobby Kennedy’s anti-corruption task force; former assistant U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois (J. Terrence "Terry" Brunner) questions the government's version of 9/11.

Professor Emeritus, International Law, Professor of Politics and International Affairs, Princeton University; in 2001 served on the three-person UN Commission on Human Rights for the Palestine Territories, and previously, on the Independent International Commission on Kosovo (Richard Falk) questions the government's version of 9/11.

Bessie Dutton Murray Distinguished Professor of Law Emeritus and Director, Center for Human Rights, University of Iowa; Fellow, World Academy of Art and Science. Honorary Editor, Board of Editors, American Journal of International Law (
Burns H. Weston) questions the government's version of 9/11.

Former president of the National Lawyers Guild (
C. Peter Erlinder), who signed a petition calling for a real investigation into 9/11. And see petition.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

 

George Washington


As a political activist for decades, I have rejoiced in victories for the people and mourned in defeats. I chose the pen name "George Washington" because - as (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Why Is It So Difficult To Convince People? by CB Brooklyn on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2007 at 12:09:57 PM
one peice of evidence I have not seen by ibrahim turner on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2007 at 2:48:00 PM
Come to the Boston Tea Party and 9/11 conference by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2007 at 4:06:59 PM
AE911Truth Promotes the Molten Metal Hoax by CB Brooklyn on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2007 at 5:03:07 PM
dissent by gravity32 on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2007 at 8:06:24 PM
Notice gravity32's Slick Way of Deception by CB Brooklyn on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2007 at 10:33:20 PM
And thus, we see... the Truth - according to South Park by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2007 at 11:09:11 PM
Perfect Example of How the Media Discredits the Propaganda! by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 1:00:20 AM
Because of the scientific method by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 11:41:52 AM
That's What I Am Doing. by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 12:49:53 PM
I'm not following you... by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 1:32:48 PM
An Hypothesis is Only Valid... by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 1:58:34 PM
These comments by Geraldo on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 4:44:56 AM
You Can Look at it That Way by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 12:53:56 PM
Logical fallacy - still by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 2:41:47 PM
Correction to your Analysis by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 2:56:20 PM
Another and better theory that fits the available data exist by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 3:31:44 PM
Another thing... by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 3:48:37 PM
Instead of quoting Occam over and over by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 5:06:42 PM
A MASSIVE Sunkist Orange by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 5:47:27 PM
You have got to be kidding by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 4:59:09 PM
A rose by any other name would still smell as sweet by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2007 at 6:04:43 PM