Tag(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (6 comments)

The Scorpion, The Frog, and the Corporation

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 4 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com

The anarchism of the libertarians and the regressive right is a delusion, and a dangerous one at that. For just as no organized game can continue without referees, no civilized nation can endure without a government. In competitive sports, it is the objective of each team to win the game. Referees have a separate function: to protect the integrity of the game by enforcing the rules, without which there can be no game. So too with governments and their laws and regulations. They exist to enact and enforce the rules that make an enduring market possible. They enforce traffic laws, without which travel would be impossible; they assign frequencies to commercial radio and TV stations (originally, in 1934, at the request of the broadcast industry). Governments enact and enforce regulations that protect the public from contaminated food and dangerous drugs, from unscrupulous investment schemes, from fraud, libel and slander, and do not forget, governments exist to protect corporations from unscrupulous competition and monopolization by competitors. (See my "Kill the Umpire").

Corporations, as William Vanderbilt emphatically asserted, exist for the benefit of their stockholders. Ideally, governments exist to represent and act in the interests of all the people, and that ongoing entity: the nation. And if a government fails in these duties to the people and to the future, then the people have the right to improve it or, failing that, abolish it and replace it with a new government. (Read The Declaration of Independence. It's all there).

For example, although I have a stake in clean air and water, I can't vote out the governing board of a polluting corporation; not unless I am a stockholder, and a wealthy one at that. However, I can elect representatives that will enact laws and regulations that protect me and other stakeholders from the abuses of the corporation. In short, if corporations, in the proper pursuit of profits for their stockholders, are also to operate to the benefit of society at large, they must be regulated by the only agency legitimately qualified to act in behalf of the general population, and that would be a democratically-elected government.

So we come to an unspectacular conclusion: capitalism and corporations are good things, but it is possible to have too much of a good thing. For these worthy and indispensable servants of the body politic can become cruel and insufferable masters, to prevent which, we establish laws and regulations - i.e., government.

Today, in Bush's America, we have way too much of these "good things," as they now undermine and destroy the institutions, the economic foundations, and the political structures that sustain us - and the corporations as well.

The solution is also compellingly obvious: let's return to the system of regulated capitalism, of checks and balances, of the rule of law, and of a government of, by, and for the people, that has served us so well for over two-hundred years.


In the previous administration, under such a regime, the American economy enjoyed unparalleled prosperity, the country was at peace, and the United States of America and its political traditions were respected throughout the world.

Let's bring back that which was proven to work in the recent past.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

(Author's note: This essay is a brief statement of an argument developed at length in my book-in-progress,
Conscience of a Progressive.).


Copyright 2006 by Ernest Partridge

Want to help get more people to read this article?
Click on the two links below. You may have to sign up (free and very fast) on netscape and digg.

promote on Netscape.com

promote on digg.com

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

www.crisispapers.org

Dr. Ernest Partridge is a consultant, writer and lecturer in the field of Environmental Ethics and Public Policy. Partridge has taught philosophy at the University of California, and in Utah, Colorado and Wisconsin. He publishes the website, "The (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

A case for abolishing corporations by gramps on Thursday, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:18:29 PM
Abolishing the corporatocracy by ardee D. on Friday, Sep 15, 2006 at 7:14:40 AM
On the same page by Elwood Anderson on Thursday, Sep 14, 2006 at 8:13:03 PM
Broken link in last comment by Elwood Anderson on Thursday, Sep 14, 2006 at 8:20:05 PM
Corporations and the quality of American democracy by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Friday, Sep 15, 2006 at 9:23:28 AM
HMMM the next American Revolution by ardee D. on Friday, Sep 15, 2006 at 7:57:54 PM