Tags for This Article:

Impeachment (2739)  Congress (2410)  Pelosi-Nancy (342)  Judiciary (176)  Subpoena (103)  Conyers-John (100)  Waxman-Henry (38)  Ray McGovern (7) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
March 22, 2008 at 07:57:51

Headlined on 3/22/08:
The Democratic Majority: Enabling a Rogue Presidency and Stonewalling the American People

by Cheryl Biren-Wright     Page 4 of 4 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

His voice rising, he stressed "That’s the only oath that you have taken. You have taken not an oath to support the Democratic Party. You’ve not taken an oath to support your political ambitions. The only unflagging obligation that you have is to defend and protect the Constitution of the United States. You are violating your oath when the reason for not going forward is not because they are not impeachable offenses, but you make a political calculation that it wouldn’t be healthy for your party - even if it would be healthy for the government of the United States and for the American people."

When Kall commented that some worried that impeachment proceedings would hurt the candidates, Fein was even more blunt than before. "I think that is nauseating. When you think about all the risks that the founding fathers took, death, their fortunes, [ . . . ] and these people say ‘yea there are impeachable offenses, but if we have to choose between the Constitution which so many have died to preserve and our party’s gains at the next election so let’s throw the Constitution out the window’ - that is nauseating. That kind of attitude would have left us a colony of Great Britain and it’s not American."

Congressional Courage

There are members of Congress who are undeterred by the Democratic leadership stance. In April 2007, Representative Dennis Kucinich introduced House Resolution 333 that, if passed, would impeach Vice President Dick Cheney. Each time an old offense was exposed or a new one committed, representatives would add their support.

In November 2007, when public pressure failed to move the resolution out of the House Judiciary where it languished, Kucinich introduced a privileged resolution to force a vote. After an afternoon of partisan politicking, the resolution landed back in the House Judiciary Committee with a new title, H. Res. 799. To date, there are 27 sponsors of H. Res. 799. Six of the 27 also serve on the House Judiciary Committee.

Moved by pressure from his constituents and a strong allegiance to the Constitution, Representative Robert Wexler (D-FL) rose up to lead the charge for impeachment hearings. In December, he authored an oped "A Case for Hearings" along with Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) also members of the House Judiciary Committee.

In addition, he setup the website WexlerWantsHearings.com where he asked the public to lend their support. His long-term goal was 50,000 online signatures. Within the first 24 hours, 30,000 Americans had added their names. Currently, there are more than 233,000 supporters.Wexler, along with 19 House members - five on the House Judiciary Committee - have written to chairman John Conyers urging support for impeachment hearings. In a New Year’s Eve post,
The Nation named Robert Wexler, "The Most Valuable Congressman" stating, "If he keeps this up in 2008, Wexler could yet force the House to be what the founders intended: a check and balance on executive lawlessness."

TBA 2008: The Republic Against the Rogue Presidency

Based on the reports from last week’s Take Back America conference, it appears that John Conyers has turned back the clock two years. It’s all about winning the elections.

One
blogger writes that the reason Conyers gave for not pursuing impeachment now is that "it would jeopardize the chance of a young, excellent man running for the White House," referring to Senator Barack Obama. Sam Stein reports that "Conyers offered a strong suggestion that he intends to consider legal action against Bush and Company once they leave office." Stein quotes Conyers as saying "We can win this thing and go get these guys after [they leave office]."

Conyers, like Senator Joe Biden (D-DE), offered that if Bush attacks Iran he should be impeached. It is disturbing to watch seasoned leaders, who have already witnessed this president wage a war on a country preemptively and on false pretenses, decide to "wait and see" rather than preventing more carngage by removing the rogue president for crimes already committed.

Activist David Swanson pulls no punches, "The congress that we elected in 2006 to end the occupation and hold Bush and Cheney accountable immediately decided to pretend to attempt to do its job for two years in hopes of winning more seats in 2008 by opposing the occupation and Bush and Cheney."

"That this would mean hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths, two years off the clock on global warming, our nation and others in ever greater danger of attack, and the continued erosion of our rights - these things didn't faze Reid or Pelosi," charged the activist. "The pretenses they've put up have included hearings, letters, subpoenas, contempt citations, and bills recriminalizing already illegal and unconstitutional actions. They've also pretended to try to pass all sorts of other legislation, such as a children's health care bill, knowing full well that they would be vetoed or signing statemented. It's a two-year election campaign at taxpayer expense."

Regarding impeachment and the elections, Swanson contends "Forcing John McCain to choose between the Constitution and the least popular president and vice president ever would be a gold mine immediately apparent to any entity capable of playing offense. The Democratic Party only plays defense."

Conyers and Nixon

Congressman Conyers might well be served, and the nation in turn, by recalling his 1974 article published in The Black Scholar entitled "Why Nixon Should Have Been Impeached."

The 45-year-old Conyers wrote, "In calling him to account, we also reestablish the proper parameters of presidential conduct. It is essential, therefore, that the record of our inquiry be complete so that no future president may infer that we have implicitly sanctioned what we have not explicitly condemned."

He closed by remarking, "Impeachment is difficult and it is painful, but the courage to do what must be done is the price of remaining free."

"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil." Thomas Jefferson

 1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Writer/Photographer/Activist. An advocate for clean government, media integrity and civil liberties. Chair of the Progressive Democrats of America S. Jersey Chapter Impeachment Team and co-leader of the New Jersey Impeach Groups. Founder of the Strike08.com campaign. Working to end the war in Iraq and prevent one with Iran. Writer and editor for OpEdNews.com. cherylbirenwright.wordpress.com

Contact Author

Contact Editor

View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Spurl      Tag!RawSugar      Shadows Tag!      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments

Mark is an anti-civilizationist in San Diego.
Mark E. SmithMark is an anti-civilizationist in San Diego.

A Dissident Democrat?

Is that something like a law-abiding member of the Mafia, or a non-racist member of the Ku Klux Klan?

Kucinich called himself "the only real Democrat." But he would never split his party's vote by running as an independent, just because his party and its candidates favor everything he claims to oppose.

Sorry, Cheryl, a Democrat is a Democrat is a Democrat, whether you call yourself a dissident Democrat, a progressive Democrat, or the only real Democrat.

Being a Democrat means that you will vote for somebody who is committed to continuing the wars of aggression (crimes against humanity) you claim to oppose, because you want your party to get a bigger share of the war profits than the other party.

It means that you remained loyal to a party that does not represent you.

It means that you are supportive of a system that does not represent you.

And it means that you remain loyal to a Constitution that does not even allow you to elect your President and Vice-President. You may, if the state you live in grants you that right, vote for Electors, but their names aren't on the ballots (the names of the candidates you may NOT vote for are on the ballots) so you think you're voting for Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidates when you don't even know who you're voting for, but whoever it is, it is NOT the names on the ballot because you may not vote for them, only the Electoral College can do that.

John Conyers is a very smart man. And he knows how ignorant and stupid most people are. He knows that the military-industrial complex decides who the candidates will be, decides who will win the elections, and controls both political parties. The MIC will not allow impeachment. So the very fact that people are asking John Conyers to do something that is not within his power to do, tells him how uninformed our electorate is.

All the candidates are committed to continuing the war crimes and one of them will be "elected" or selected by the Supreme Court.

To belong to ANY political party, or to vote in this country's faith-based elections, is an indication of ignorance and apathy -- ignorance of who really runs this country, and apathy with regard to war crimes. The only thing a person of conscience who wants to be able to die without blood on their hands can do, is to refuse to vote. Fifty percent of the electorate already do just that because nobody on the ballot ever represents their interests.

Join us, or remain a Vichy Democrat. Or a dissident Vichy Democrat if you prefer. Whether you piously claim to oppose the war crimes doesn't matter. What matters is if you will support a party (and its candidates) that has consistently voted for war crimes and is committed to continuing them. Only war criminals and their collaborators will do that, and I am proud of the fifty percent of Americans who will not. WE are the only ones who really care.

 

by Mark E. Smith (20 articles, 23 quicklinks, 59 diaries, 710 comments) on Sunday, March 23, 2008 at 2:33:38 AM
 


I have worked as a reporter, media watch columnist, ran a consumer group for three years and been an occasional pro se attorney. I've sold everything from vacuum cleaners to satelite dishes to computers. I am a huge fan (literally, I'm 6' 5") of comics and science fiction and am a Pop Culture addict in general.
Philip ShropshireI have worked as a reporter, media watch columnist, ran a consumer group for three years and been an occasional pro se attorney. I've sold everything from vacuum cleaners to satelite dishes to computers. I am a huge fan (literally, I'm 6' 5") of comics and science fiction and am a Pop Culture addict in general.

I think that's an unfair critique...

There really are no viable third parties in the United States. They're underfunded whites only clubs that simply aren't competitive in just about any race of consequence. I think there are differences between the major parties, perhaps not much but I remember having a decent job during the Clinton years, not to mention that I never worried about being sent to an internment camp. I am extremely disappointed that they haven't impeached our current war criminals in chief but I will participate in the process as much as I can...

 

Philip Shropshire 

www.threeriversonline.com

 

PS: I think there is less risk going after Bush after he's no longer commander in chief of the armed forces, which, and after watching this guy for awhile, he would probably use to keep power, up to and including the arrests of anyone and anybody who tried to "impeach" him... 

by Philip Shropshire (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 7 comments) on Sunday, March 23, 2008 at 3:59:06 AM
 


Writer/Photographer/Activist. An advocate for clean government, media integrity and civil liberties. Chair of the Progressive Democrats of America S. Jersey Chapter Impeachment Team and co-leader of the New Jersey Impeach Groups. Founder of the Strike08.com campaign. Working to end the war in Iraq and prevent one with Iran. Writer and editor for OpEdNews.com.

cherylbirenwright.wordpress.com

Cheryl Biren-WrightWriter/Photographer/Activist. An advocate for clean government, media integrity and civil liberties. Chair of the Progressive Democrats of America S. Jersey Chapter Impeachment Team and co-leader of the New Jersey Impeach Groups. Founder of the Strike08.com campaign. Working to end the war in Iraq and prevent one with Iran. Writer and editor for OpEdNews.com.

cherylbirenwright.wordpress.com

honestly?

thanks, mark, for sharing your thoughts, but do you honestly think that

The only thing a person of conscience who wants to be able to die without blood on their hands can do, is to refuse to vote. Fifty percent of the electorate already do just that because nobody on the ballot ever represents their interests . . . I am proud of the fifty percent of Americans who will not. WE are the only ones who really care.

i very seriously doubt the reason 50% of our electorate are not voting is a matter of principle. i seriously doubt there are that many who are sitting around assessing the situation and concluding that no one represents them and hence they are not voting. do you have stats on that? a good percentage of that 50% i am sure are people who simply don't give a sh*t. i think it's more about apathy.

that said, perhaps you can share more about what you think people ought to be actively doing to help the situation. and, for the record, i am not registered for any party, although i did take a Democratic ballot in nj last month to vote against clinton. and, no, that does not mean i think obama is all that much better.

p.s. do the other "anti-civilizationists" know you're using a computer?

by Cheryl Biren-Wright (13 articles, 9 quicklinks, 8 diaries, 186 comments) on Sunday, March 23, 2008 at 6:33:52 AM
 


Brett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.
Brett PaatschBrett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.

Holding impeachment hearings IS within Conyers power

and its also within the ambit of his oath of office. Conyers cannot credibly argue that he does not perceive the Bush administration as a domestic enemy of the constitution. 

the very fact that people are asking John Conyers to do something that is not within his power to do, tells him how uninformed our electorate is.

It would involve some political risk yes, but as Cheryl points out in her article that Fein has noted, those who played key roles in the founding of the United States put a lot more at risk personally than just their careers.

I am not an American but found Opednews because my daily google alert on impeach Bush kept showing that Opednews was a place where likeminded Americans were posting. Yet even here there is a very small minority that actually seem to know how their own system works as opposed to having mythological beliefs about it - many of which seem to serve no real purpose other than to convince those who could do something with the power of a citizen to actually rationalise doing very little at all. 

I don't doubt for a moment that there is some substance to the notion of a military industrial complex but I don't credit that any such a complex would weild more political power that large numbers of Americans writing their representatives and demanding that their oaths of office be upheld or else. 

The real problem with America is that most Americans don't understand the power they have and don't accept any of the responsibilies of maintaining a government of the people by the people for the people.

Modern America is a great example of bystander calculus - a phenomena whereby people perceive that there is a problem but also that there are a large numbers of witnesses to that problem and so each actually does less figuring their contribution would either be too small or their non contribution will go overlooked.

by Brett Paatsch (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 13 diaries, 610 comments) on Sunday, March 23, 2008 at 6:51:07 PM
 


I am a Vietnam Vet disabled by MS and other various diseases.  On average I am a Moderate with slight Conservative leanings although it truly depends on what issue I am concerned with at the time.
Hayesml47I am a Vietnam Vet disabled by MS and other various diseases.  On average I am a Moderate with slight Conservative leanings although it truly depends on what issue I am concerned with at the time.

Impeachment list

It is time to add Conyers and Pelosi to the impeachment list.  If we can just impeach one of these miserable creeps then maybe the whole deck of them will start to fall.  God knows this list is getting bigger all the time.

by Hayesml47 (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 200 comments) on Sunday, March 23, 2008 at 5:52:43 PM
 


Michael Cavlan , RN, was an Official Green Party Observer for the 2004 Ohio Re-Count.
He was the Green Party Candidate for US Senate 2006 and is a Candidate US Senate
2008 Seeking Green Party Endorsement in Minnesota. See www.michaelcavlan.org

Michael CavlanMichael Cavlan , RN, was an Official Green Party Observer for the 2004 Ohio Re-Count.
He was the Green Party Candidate for US Senate 2006 and is a Candidate US Senate
2008 Seeking Green Party Endorsement in Minnesota. See www.michaelcavlan.org

Why No Impeachment

Cheryl,

Please feel free to check out my story on Impeachment. Oh and for the record Impeach For Peace also cornered Conyers in Minnesota. Check out my campaign website, click on the movie about Conyers. I am the guy in Nurses scrubs (I am a Nurse) challenging Conyers.

 

I am a dissident, plain and simple. I oppose BOTH wings of the war machine.

 

Michael Cavlan

 

Minnesota 

by Michael Cavlan (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 71 comments) on Monday, March 24, 2008 at 2:38:09 PM
 

 

6 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008