Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   No comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Sibel Edmonds vs. the Nuclear Terrorists

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 4 of 14 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

http://www.911blogger.com/node/11521

May 13, 2004 John Ascroft retroactively classifies FBI testimony at the June 17, 2002 Senate Judiciary Hearings, along with the letters sent to him by Grassley and Leahy.

May 14, 2004 Declaration of John Ashcroft: Attorney General asserts state secrets privilege in Thomas Burnett et al. vs. Al Baraka Investment & Development Corp- 600 9/11 families were represented

http://www.fas.org/sgp/jud/edmonds051404.pdf

June 2004 POGO Sues DOJ/Ashcroft over retroactive classification of material that was in the public domain, regarding Sibel Edmonds- Statement of Facts

http://www.pogo.org/m/gp/a/POGO facts.pdf

June 23, 2004 Sibel Edmonds PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF

OR, ALTERNATIVELY, TO CONDUCT LIMITED DISCOVERY

http://www.fas.org/sgp/jud/edmonds062304.pdf

June 23, 2004 Statement of Sen. Charles Grassley about the FBI's retroactive classification of information regarding Sibel Edmonds

http://grassley.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&PressRelease_id=5462329a-28b7-46e9-99a3-7a799445fd70&Month=6&Year=2004

"It's ludicrous to classify information that's been in the public domain for two years. I've got questions about whether this has anything to do with genuine national security. If it does, then the action might actually aid our enemies by alerting them to publicly available information that the U.S. government now considers sensitive. It doesn't enhance national security for the Justice Department and the FBI to go out of its way to identify and classify information that's on-line, in newspapers and on the airwaves."

July 6, 2004 [Judge Reggie Walton issues] Court Order Dismissing Case: State Secrets Privilege Upheld re: Sibel Edmonds

http://www.fas.org/sgp/jud/edmonds070604b.pdf

July 6, 2004 Memorandum Opinion Dismissing Sibel Edmonds v. Dept of Justice

http://fas.org/sgp/jud/edmonds070604.pdf

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Demand Public Hearings for Sibel Edmonds

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

www.911Reports.com

Erik Larson, Human Being and concerned Citizen. I only advocate and practice non-violent methods of social and political activism & change. Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here by me in my articles and diaries are my own. I do my best to only (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sibel Edmonds vs. the Nuclear Terrorists

DOJ Confirms Previously-Denied File Said to Implicate US Officials in Nuclear Espionage by Erik Larson

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments