Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Group(s): Add to My Group
January 10, 2008 at 00:00:01

View Ratings | Rate It

Alarms Should Go Off Whenever the Discrepancies Between the "Official" Results and the Polls Can't Be Explained

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By andi novick (about the author)     Page 4 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

University of Pennsylvania statistician Steve Freeman, Ph.D., analysed the exit polls of the swing states of Pennsylvania, Ohio and Florida in 2004 and concluded that the odds of the exit polls being as far off as they were are 250 million to one.

The media also failed to get back to us on the inexplicable discrepancies in Florida in the 2000 election. Turns out the "mainstream" media’s projections had been right all along. The problem wasn’t the exit polls, but the official tallies themselves. In analyses conducted by the National Opinion Research Center in Florida after the U.S. Supreme Court aborted the vote recount, Gore emerged the winner over Bush, no matter what criteria for counting votes was applied.

How could our media not have investigated the correlation, if any, between the increased use of electronic voting systems, with their non-transparent secret software, and the sudden demise of a half century’s experience with highly reliable exit polls? The rest of the world still considers exit polls as the gold standard of accuracy so how is it that this phenomenon only exists in the United States? Not only did our media fail to question such a remarkable coincidence, but ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox and the Associated Press have all refused to release the raw exit poll data, requested by Rep. Conyers on behalf of the Judiciary Committee. In his request Conyers stated that the information in the media’s possession was needed because "the American citizenry has voiced a collective lack of faith in government to carry out fair election procedures". Ironically, this very need to protect its citizens against a government not accountable to the people was what caused the founders to include protections in the Constitution so that the press would be free to provide to the people this very information it’s now withholding. "Our liberty cannot be guarded but by the freedom of the press". – Thomas Jefferson

The Ohio Recount which followed the 2004 election, aside from being successfully thwarted, continued the electronic nightmare. In a nutshell: in an interview a former employee of Triad confessed to having altered tabulating software in a great number of counties in Ohio. The Conyers Report, stated that it strongly appeared Triad was engaged in a course of behavior to provide "cheat sheets" to those counting the ballots so that the machines would correlate with the recount and appear to be operating fairly and effectively.

See the pattern? Still think we’ll just vote them out in 2006 or 2008? We’ve lost the means to hold our government accountable. We’ve lost our constitutionally guaranteed free press – in service to we the people. We’ve lost our vote that so many Americans gave their lives for. We are all we have left if we are to save this republic. It is therefore every person’s responsibility to take this on.

The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil Constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. We have received them as a fair inheritance from our worthy ancestors: they purchased them for us with toil and danger and expense of treasure and blood, and transmitted them to us with care and diligence. It will bring an everlasting mark of infamy on the present generation, enlightened as it is, if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle, or to be cheated out of them by the artifices of false and designing men." — Samuel Adams

* originally published at freepress.org on March 17, 2006

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Make voting safe, verifiable, secure, trustworthy and accountable

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

ElectionTransparencyCoalitition.org

Andi Novick Election Transparency Coalition, www.etcnys.org, http://nylevers.wordpress.com/

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Election Reform"
The Election After Reform: Money, Politics, and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (Campaigning American Style)
by Michael J. Malbin

$34.95
Lowest New Price $28.51

Number of pages: 304
Publisher: Rowman

Election Fraud: Detecting and Deterring Electoral Manipulation (Brookings Series on Election Administration and Reform)
by R. Michael Alvarez

$26.95
Lowest New Price $14.50

Number of pages: 255
Publisher: Brookings Institution Press

Campaign and Election Reform (Contemporary World Issues)
by Glenn H. Utter

$55.00
Lowest New Price $27.50

Number of pages: 371
Publisher: ABC-CLIO

Democracy in the States: Experiments in Election Reform (Brookings Series on Election Administration and Reform)

$26.95
Lowest New Price $9.50

Number of pages: 238
Publisher: Brookings Institution Press

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

note about Chuck Hagel and wikipedia by Better World Order on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 1:53:21 AM
good job! by Joan Brunwasser on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 7:25:05 AM
Who's vote counts by tjb on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 7:56:43 AM
TPM quotes Zogby saying vote was explainable by Richmond Gardner on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 8:23:11 AM
Another Analysis by PrMaine on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 8:38:39 AM
But this does nothing to explain the paper ballot/exit poll by Ivan the Terrible on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 3:28:55 PM
HCPB Results differ from Computer tabulated results by Rady Ananda on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 9:28:32 PM
About the Alarms by Bob McCarty Writes on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 8:36:35 AM
You're only explaining predictive polls not exit polls/paper by Ivan the Terrible on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 3:35:46 PM
nice to be by Rob Kall on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 6:18:34 PM
this guy is not believable by Better World Order on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 6:51:10 PM
How hard can it be? by Mr M on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 8:53:12 AM
Litany of Shame by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 9:48:58 AM
THE "I COUNT CORPS" -- Sign up to take back our elections by andi novick on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:23:35 AM
Why no investigation? by ibrahim turner on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 3:24:00 PM
Keep your eye on the top by GatorVol on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:51:23 PM
This apparent Diebold Bump or Diebold Bounce for Hillary is by Ivan the Terrible on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 3:51:22 PM
Poll Voting Should Be our Verification Procedure by Dom Jermano on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 5:44:36 PM
Voting/Polling by August Adams on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 7:12:38 PM
Fantastic, well-sourced, comprehensive piece by Rady Ananda on Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 9:41:48 PM
Yup by John Burik on Saturday, Jan 12, 2008 at 11:58:02 AM
Yes, hand count by John Burik on Saturday, Jan 12, 2008 at 3:51:17 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum