Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (27 comments)

A ROMP THROUGH THE QUANTUM FIELD with Gregg Braden and Dr. Bruce Lipton


Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (31 fans)   -- Page 4 of 8 page(s)

opednews.com

DR. BRUCE LIPTON


Dr. Bruce Lipton

"-Meryl Ann Butler: Bruce, the merging of your and Gregg Braden’s work is so exciting! Thank you for your willingness to share some of your thoughts with us.

Dr. Bruce H. Lipton: Thanks, I’m happy to participate!

MAB: The premise of your book “The Biology of Belief” is that humans are not, as was previously believed, victims of our genes, but that the environment has a direct effect on our DNA. Would you elaborate?

BL: Sure. Until recently, it was thought that genes were self-actualizing, meaning genes could turn themselves on and off. As a result, most people today believe they are genetic automatons, and that their genes control their lives.

But my research introduces a radical new understanding of cell science. The new biology reveals that we ‘control’ our genome rather than being controlled by it. It is now recognized that the environment, and more specifically, our perception or interpretation of the environment directly controls the activity of our genes. This explains why people can have spontaneous remissions or recover from injuries deemed to be permanent disabilities.


The Biology of Belief by Dr. Bruce Lipton

MAB: Then it really is about “mind over matter”?

BL: Yes, this new perspective of human biology does not view the body as just a mechanical device, but rather incorporates the role of a mind and spirit. This breakthrough is fundamental in all healing because it recognizes that when we change our perception or beliefs we send totally different messages to our cells, causing a reprogramming of their _expression.

This new science is called epigenetics. It’s been around for about 16 years, but it’s just now being introduced to the general public. For example, The American Cancer Society is an organization that has been looking for cancer genes for the last 50 years or so. But they’ve found that only about 5 percent of cancer has genetic linkage, leaving 95% that is not genetically linked. Recently the American Cancer Society released a statistic that said 60 percent of cancer is avoidable by changing lifestyle and diet. So now they are telling us, “It’s the way you live, it’s not your genes.”

MAB: So the long sought-after “Fountain of Youth” could be right inside ourselves?

BL: Within every one of our bodies at this very moment, there are billions of stem cells, embryonic cells designed to repair or replace damaged tissues and organs. "-However, the activity and fate of these regenerative cells are epigenetically controlled. That means they are profoundly influenced by our thoughts and perceptions about the environment. Hence our beliefs about aging can either interfere with or enhance stem cell function, causing our physiological regeneration or decline.

MAB: What part does evolution play in this?

BL: Well, as it turns out, Darwin was wrong. Current science overrides Darwin’s theories emphasizing competition and struggle, but this information can take years to get into the textbooks. Cooperation and community are actually the underlying principles of evolution, as well as the underlying principles of cell biology. The human body represents the cooperative effort of a community of fifty-trillion single cells. A community, by definition, is an organization of individuals committed to supporting a shared vision.

Jean-Baptiste Lamarck had it right fifty years before Darwin. In 1809, Lamarck wrote the problems that will beset humanity will come from separating ourselves from nature, and that will lead to the dissolution of society. His understanding of evolution was that an organism and its environment create a cooperative interaction. If you want to understand the fate of an organism, you have to understand its relationship to the environment. He recognized that separating ourselves from our environment cuts us off from our source. He was right.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8

 

http://www.merylannbutler.com

Meryl Ann Butler is an artist, author, educator and OEN Editor who has been actively engaged in utilizing the arts as stepping-stones toward joy-filled wellbeing for over 25 years. She studied art with Harold Ransom Stevenson in Sea Cliff NY for (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
27 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I like this idea but... by erik mouse on Friday, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:17:57 PM
Fantastic by Ferdinand on Friday, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:41:31 PM
Quack science is murder by Ami Isseroff on Friday, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:58:43 PM
Hang on there by erik mouse on Friday, Feb 15, 2008 at 1:17:45 PM
What are you afraid of? by Randje Mitchell on Monday, Feb 18, 2008 at 9:27:20 PM
ONE MAN'S FOOD IS ANOTHER MAN'S POISON by Meryl Ann Butler on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:55:59 AM
It is true that what we think determines our reality. by Bill Douglas on Friday, Feb 15, 2008 at 1:30:03 PM
Prayerfully by George Washington on Friday, Feb 15, 2008 at 2:08:16 PM
Correct link. by George Washington on Friday, Feb 15, 2008 at 2:09:28 PM
Quantum Leaps by Cinderfella on Friday, Feb 15, 2008 at 4:34:05 PM
The most interesting point in "Biology of Belief" which is B by Bill Douglas on Friday, Feb 15, 2008 at 5:01:59 PM
Quack? by Doug Wilson on Friday, Feb 15, 2008 at 5:01:40 PM
stats on scientists by Meryl Ann Butler on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:44:12 AM
B-S or not by Kuzminski on Friday, Feb 15, 2008 at 7:39:04 PM
They're getting there... by Morgaine Swann on Saturday, Feb 16, 2008 at 4:18:15 AM
This is premonitional? by ibrahim turner on Saturday, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:55:22 AM
beyond axiomatics by W. Christopher Epler (Bill) on Saturday, Feb 16, 2008 at 3:18:13 PM
beliefs by joed on Saturday, Feb 16, 2008 at 8:46:05 PM
dodgy maths by norrie mAy-welby on Saturday, Feb 16, 2008 at 8:52:36 PM
THANK YOU! by Meryl Ann Butler on Monday, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:45:54 PM
According to the formula: by JackN on Monday, Feb 18, 2008 at 9:43:45 PM
The shoe is in the wrong foot by Mark Angelo Cummings on Monday, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:25:12 AM
Simplest Way to Use the Formula by Paul Davis on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 1:56:17 PM
THANKS, PAUL! by Meryl Ann Butler on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:00:44 AM
HAGELIN'S RESPONSE by Meryl Ann Butler on Tuesday, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:22:53 PM
Not Ready for Prime Time! by Sherwin Steffin on Saturday, Feb 23, 2008 at 4:02:05 PM
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS by Meryl Ann Butler on Tuesday, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:31:27 PM