Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
10 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Vanity of Perfectionism

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 4 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 7/27/12

opednews.com

So, this choice over how to vote should not be a decision based upon personal feelings or one's flattering desire for a perfect self-image. The American people are hiring the person who will be entrusted with the nuclear codes, who will have the power to start wars, who will decide whether to take action on global warming.

Real people in other countries live or die by such U.S. decisions. Even if some Americans feel that voting for some imperfect candidate is too degrading, too compromising, the decision can have devastating consequences for others.

Yes, there is an element of triage here, since neither Obama nor Romney would be a pacifist. Some people will die regardless of who's elected, but there can be an order of magnitude difference. There is a distinction between targeted killings of al-Qaeda operatives (even with "collateral" deaths of people in the vicinity) and the mass slaughter inflicted by fullscale war.

At minimum, it would seem to be the duty of American voters to minimize the damage that their country might inflict on people in faraway lands. Even if perfection is not an option, one of the choices is likely to cause fewer deaths and wreak less havoc than the other. It may be impossible to know the future but history can be some guide.

While this responsibility to mitigate harm to the world may seem unsatisfying to Americans who yearn for something much closer to moral purity -- and who don't want to sully their consciences with such moral relativism -- this lesser-evilism does have a profoundly moral basis.

Just stop and ask: as imperfect as Humphrey, Carter and Gore were, would the world be in a better place if they had been elected in 1968, 1980 and 2000, respectively.

Would there likely be fewer people living in poverty in the United States or dying without health care? Would American politics be more democratic and less corrupt than it is today? Would the environment be less endangered? Would science and reason be disparaged the way they are today?

Would a lot of innocent Vietnamese, Cambodians, Salvadorans, Guatemalans, Nicaraguans, Afghans, Iraqis and people from many other countries be alive today? Might they have escaped horrible deaths, rapes and maiming? While no one can say for sure, you can make a reasonable guess.

So, in the end, what's more important? What's more moral? The vanity of perfectionism when perfection is not an option or doing the imperfect thing to save some innocent lives -- and maybe save the planet?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

http://www.consortiumnews.com

Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at secrecyandprivilege.com. It's also available at more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The CIA/Likud Sinking of Jimmy Carter

Ron Paul's Appalling World View

Ronald Reagan: Worst President Ever?

The Disappearance of Keith Olbermann

A Perjurer on the US Supreme Court

The 9/11 'Truth' Parlor Game

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
the above arguments miss the point.  The real... by Mark Sashine on Friday, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:14:48 PM
Robert Parry's article should be mandatory reading... by michael payne on Saturday, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:20:03 PM
but also nothing is  only ours. The above arg... by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:13:17 PM
Did you ever stop to think that those people who t... by michael payne on Saturday, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:26:41 PM
...............and ask a myriad of good questions,... by Robert P. Philipps on Saturday, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:43:14 PM
the above author  wrote a huge article justif... by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:46:02 PM
That's what America really needs in one of the mos... by michael payne on Saturday, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:15:31 PM
I will offer you  help and place to stay. Hop... by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:40:09 PM
Mr. Parry, your article was most certainly informa... by Amy Schreiner on Sunday, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:01:29 AM
Nor do I think that Romney would declare the NDAA ... by Amy Schreiner on Sunday, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:49:20 AM