Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 6/9/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (19 comments)

The Democratic Primaries 2008: Managing Electoral Dynamics Via Covert Vote-Count Manipulation

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (1 fan)   -- Page 4 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com

Conclusion

Election theft is certainly hard to prove, with virtually all hard evidence withheld as proprietary; and even well-supported allegations by credible journalists, computer scientists, security professionals and election integrity activists are given a wide berth by both the mainstream media and the established political powers of both major parties.

Yet, even with the limited tools at our disposal, we keep discovering evidence-in pre-election polls, exit polls, and published election results –that is consistent with a pattern of widespread covert manipulation of vote counts.  

We will continue to investigate and report these anomalies until a thorough and unblinking investigation of suspicious results is undertaken by those in position to collect the additional evidence needed to establish incontrovertible proof.  But since many of those in the best position to investigate election anomalies are themselves elected officials, our best hope may be to follow the recent example of Ireland and the Netherlands-dispense with voting computers, and simply count our own paper ballots by hand. 



[1] There were significant oddities on the Republican side as well, beyond the scope of our analysis here.

[2] Remarkably enough, we know with certainty that the precise model of optical scan voting equipment in use in NH, Diebold Accuvote OS Model 1.94W, is vulnerable to outcome-altering manipulation by insiders.  A live demonstration on that very Diebold model was captured in the HBO documentary "Hacking Democracy". 
[3]  See  

[4]  In this case significant means "larger than the exit poll margin of error".

 
[5]  Weighted, 1421 respondents, approximate margin of error 3%.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

www.ElectionDefenseAlliance.org

Jonathan Simon, a graduate of Harvard College and New York University School of Law, is a member of the Bar of Massachusetts. He is also a Chiropractic Physician and directs the clinic Hands-On Health Associates in Cambridge. As a result of his (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
19 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Stalin, anyone? by AllDems08 on Monday, Jun 9, 2008 at 11:26:32 AM
AGREE and DISAGREE by Charlie L on Monday, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:19:51 PM
Secret Vote Counting is Unconstitutional and Unreliable!!! by Mark Adams on Monday, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:26:25 PM
So we are clear... by steve scheetz on Monday, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:24:54 PM
It's a Hard Case to Make by PrMaine on Monday, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:42:12 PM
It is not a hard case to make. by steve scheetz on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:57:04 AM
It's Never Hard if You Ignore Reality by PrMaine on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:30:57 AM
I could swear by steve scheetz on Wednesday, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:36:54 AM
I could swear by PrMaine on Wednesday, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:36:52 PM
well, you are wrong. by steve scheetz on Thursday, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:10:02 PM
We Will Have to Agree to Disagree by PrMaine on Friday, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:40:59 AM
To be quite honest by steve scheetz on Friday, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:53:05 PM
My calculation reinforces Jonathan's already strong case. by David Griscom on Monday, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:26:21 PM
David, your concurrance has great weight by Michael Collins on Monday, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:46:14 PM
Excellent and vital piece of analysis by Michael Collins on Monday, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:48:03 PM
There IS a way to find out who is doing the rigging! by David Griscom on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:12:49 AM
Democratic Primaries Maipulated? by Judith Conoyer on Monday, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:13:05 PM
The System that Should Be.. by Dennis Kaiser on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:42:21 AM
Re: SeeVote by AllDems08 on Wednesday, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:08:15 PM