Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   No comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Palestine UN Vote Postmortems

By       Message Stephen Lendman     Permalink
      (Page 4 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Author 194
Become a Fan
  (191 fans)
- Advertisement -

Congressional, Knesset and Israeli Lobby hardliners prioritize war on humanity, violent confrontations, racist hate, misinformation, bald-faced lies, and support for Israel's worst crimes.

In Jerusalem, police prevented MKs Aryeh Eldad and Michael Ben Ari from burning a Palestinian flag outside UN headquarters.

Western scoundrel media support for Israel is longstanding. On November 28, a Washington Post editorial headlined "What will Palestinians do after the UN vote?"

Will peace talks resume? Will Palestine sue Israeli officials at the ICC? Will Fatah/Hamas reconciliation happen? Will Palestinian violence and Abbas' retirement follow?

Like other media scoundrels, the Post ignored Palestinian statehood, blamed the PA for not pursuing peace, accused Hamas of "lob(bing) rockets at Israel," and PA leaders of "submit(ting) pointless petitions to the United Nations."

The editorial, previous ones, op-eds, and straight reporting ignore decades of occupation harshness, illegal settlements, and horrendous Israeli crimes.

Previous New York Times editorials opposed Palestinian self-determination. Only Jewish rights matter in Times Square.

- Advertisement -

On November 28, another New York Times editorial headlined "The Palestinians UN Bid." It reaffirmed which side it's on. Longstanding Times policy spurns Palestinian rights.

General Assembly support won't "endure creation of a viable Palestinian state and guarantee Israel's security."

Palestinian statehood exists. A companion article explained. Palestinians never threatened Israeli security. They don't now. Israel menaces the region. Times editors ignore facts on the ground they know or should.

"Peace negotiations have been at an impasse since 2008."

Legitimate peace talks never happened because Israel spurns them. Palestinians wanted conflict resolution for decades. Without a legitimate partner, it's impossible.

- Advertisement -

The Times urged "serious new effort(s) at a negotiated two-state solution." When Israel's Separation Wall is completed, its West Bank control will approach 60%.

Over half a million settlers occupy Palestinian land. More join them daily. Closed military zones, restricted tourist areas, commercial locations, and other Jews-only development exclude non-Jews.

At one time, two states were viable. No longer. Partition won't work. What will is one state for all its people at peace with equal rights.  It's the only legitimate way if pursued and given a chance.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


I was born in 1934, am a retired, progressive small businessman concerned about all the major national and world issues, committed to speak out and write about them.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The McCain-Lieberman Police State Act

Daniel Estulin's "True Story of the Bilderberg Group" and What They May Be Planning Now

Continuity of Government: Coup d'Etat Authority in America

America Facing Depression and Bankruptcy

Lies, Damn Lies and the Murdoch Empire

Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccine Alert