Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   Well Said 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 11/2/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (16 comments)

Interview with Naomi Wolf

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (193 fans)   -- Page 4 of 12 page(s)

opednews.com

Wolf:  You’re very interested in happiness.  Well, then this will definitely resonate for you; it certainly resonated for me.  I was really stunned.  I always... The thing that most Americans, including myself, know from the Declaration of Independence is that famous phrase “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” 

And, really, part of the fake democracy messaging and fake patriotism messaging is the notion that this is the most important part of the Declaration of Independence; and it’s kind of the essence of America.  And that what it means is, we’re given the impression what it means is, you know, you can be a biker dude and I can be playing bridge and we’ll just leave each other alone, or you can consume in this part of the mall at Talbot’s and I’ll consume in that part of the mall at Victoria’s Secret and we’ll just leave each other alone; and we’ll all consume together, or we’ll meet our own personal goals side by side.

And that’s totally not... First of all, that’s not what happiness meant in the 18th century, to the people who drafted this beautiful document.  What happiness meant in the 18th century has much more of a sense of using your faculties to the highest point in a context of freedom to serve the greatest good. It’s a sense of devotion and harmony and service.

That blew my mind, because I think Americans really aren’t happy right now, and I think one reason they’re not happy is that the definition of happiness we’re given is all about consuming and personal gratification; whereas... I think another reason that American’s are not happy is that we’ve fallen away from this extraordinary ideal that we’re supposed to carry of being this nation that embodies justice, and the rule of law, and liberty – that each of us, individually is supposed to carry, not that our leaders are supposed to do it for us.

And so, then, moving on to the next paragraph, it’s so mind-blowing, too, because, as I say, you’re never taught this, but, as I mentioned, it’s like an absolute, categorical demand that you have to hold your government accountable when it goes astray.  So... I never will read the Declaration of Independence the same way again.

Kall:  Yes, you’ve really turned it from something that is stale... as you’ve described it, as an illegible piece of parchment that is shown as a picture, not a living document, in history books... you’ve turned it into something that is vital, that calls upon people to reach for the best within themselves and for their country, which maybe is the ultimate form of patriotism.

Wolf:  Well, that’s very kind, but truly, it was there; it was in there all along.  I was amazed, going back to the research that I did for Give me Liberty, because it was a totally different picture of what this nation and what we are intended to be than I was ever taught in high school, or in college, or in graduate school.  You know, the founding generation – and again, I didn’t just look at the well known white men whose names we’re all familiar with, but all these ordinary people, who were so on fire – they were doing things like... I’m not saying trying to stay home, but they were... you know, King George III’s tax collectors were oppressing them, breaking into homes without representation, without warrants, and they would dismantle the tax collector’s homes, brick by brick – there was not a brick standing.

When Washington went ahead and with the Jay Treaty and the people didn’t approve of it and they felt humiliated by it – there were riots up and down the Eastern seaboard.  I mean, these people just did not shut up about liberty, even the most oppressed people, the enslaved African-Americans.  I never knew this:  there were many, many what were called “Freedom Feet” in the Colonial Era, when African-American slaves would sue the state legislatures for their freedom using the language that is the same language as that in the Declaration of Independence. 

These people risked their lives to say, “You know what?  This ideal belongs to all of us.”  These are gutsy, gutsy people - and they categorically intended these seven core principles that we’ve been brainwashed to not carry in our hearts - things like ordinary people are supposed to run things; you have an obligation to dissent; you’re supposed to not have an established God, America does not establish a God over men and women because this is supposed to be national where you have freedom of conscience. They knew how corrupt it was when a state wraps its arms around a corrupt church and uses it to browbeat individuals.  The people who started this country fled places where Puritans and Huguenots and Quakers were tortured or murdered by the state because of their religious beliefs.

You know, this reverence for the rule of law we’re supposed to have is one of the key principles; so that when Sarah Palin or the White House defies subpoenas, that says anything, that that's un-American.  Finally, a core principle like the fact that we’re not supposed to have an oppressive empire subverting liberty around the world... that would’ve appalled the founders.  The founders didn’t see America as owning liberty; they saw America as serving liberty, and that liberty was universal.  So they would have been horrified at a situation where, since 1898, as long as we’ve had a measure of freedom at home, or most of us, we’ve turned a blind on the fact that business interests are sending our military around the world to subvert democratically-elected governments to install trusted dictators who oppress and torture and murder and silence the population exactly as the founders were oppressed by the greatest empire at that time on Earth.  So these core values are so important for us to get back to at a time when there really is a war against citizens.

Kall:  Absolutely.  I just need to do a station ID.  It’s the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, 1360 AM, WNJC.  I’m on the phone now with Naomi Wolf, who is the author of Give Me Liberty:  A Handbook for American Revolutionaries.  I mentioned in my e-mail to you, the name of the show is the Bottom Up Show, and it’s because I believe that we’re going through a bottom up revolution now.  You hear it almost every day, Obama talking about it, it’s talked about it all the time on the Internet.  The opposite of bottom up is top down; top down is when people are told “this is America, how wonderful it is,” rather than “everybody’s responsible for keeping America wonderful.”  And I always like to ask my guests about their observations on bottom up ways of seeing, understanding, the world and its processes.

Wolf:  Is that a question?

Kall:  That’s a question, yes.

Wolf:  Can you restate it?  I didn’t quite hear it.  Oh, you’re talking about bottom up ways of seeing the world and its progress?

            Kall:  Of seeing... particularly from your area of interest, of                liberty, of democracy, of revolution.

Wolf:  Well, it’s exactly about that.  You could not be more in alignment with this basic message, if that’s your focus.  We’ve been bombarded, again, with this messaging for a long time, that we should leave running the country to politicians, and we should leave the holding of the debates to Fox News and CNN, and we should leave writing the op-eds to the pundits (which is why I love OpEdNews), and that we should leave worrying about the Constitution to Constitutional scholars, and this is all wrong.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

With his experience as architect and founder of a technorati top 100 blog, he is also a new media / social media consultant and trainer for corporations, non-profits, entrepreneurs and authors.

Rob is a frequent Speaker on the bottom up revolution, politics, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey, Positive Psychology, Stress, Biofeedback and a wide range of subjects. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates, and optimizing tapping the power of new media. He recently retired as organizer of several conferences, including StoryCon, the Summit Meeting on the Art, Science and Application of Story and The Winter Brain Meeting on neurofeedback, biofeedback, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology. See more of his articles here and, older ones, here.

To learn more about me and OpEdNews.com, check out A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article.

And there are Rob's quotes, here.

To Watch me on youtube, having a lively conversation with John Conyers, Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click here Now, wouldn't you like to see me on the political news shows, representing progressives. If so, tell your favorite shows to bring me on and refer them to this youtube video

My radio show, The Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, runs 9-10 PM EST Wednesday evenings, on AM 1360, WNJC and is archived at www.opednews.com/podcasts Or listen to it streaming, live at www.wnjc1360.com

Rob also host a health/mind/body/heart/spirit radio show-- the Rob Kall Futurehealth radio show. Check out podcasts from it at futurehealth.org/podcasts

Follow me on Twitter

A few declarations.
-While I'm registered as a Democrat, I consider myself to be a dynamic critic of the Democratic party, just as, well, not quite as much, but almost as much as I am a critic of republicans.

-My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.

Recent press coverage in the Wall Street Journal: Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Voting With Naomi by john mccarthy on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:20:41 AM
Agreed by Rob Kall on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:23:28 AM
Politics Is Not Our Friend. by John Hanks on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:22:15 AM
How by Michael Dewey on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:22:05 PM
An activist who tells truth to power by Jay Farrington on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:29:53 AM
Great Post by Steven G. Erickson on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:32:19 AM
Bio Info by john mccarthy on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:39:24 AM
What makes sense ;) by Patrick Michael on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:15:35 AM
The long, slow "coup" -- the takeover by editnetwork on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:12:44 PM
We are given very few and limited choices. by nightgaunt on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:24:08 AM
A Wolf in Sheep's clothing by Scott Baker on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:25:58 AM
good questions by Rob Kall on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:34:09 AM
Proving Conspiracy by john mccarthy on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:52:51 AM
Terror by john mccarthy on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:03:17 PM
The Case for a Conspiratorial World-View by Bill Cain on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:32:48 PM
How by Michael Dewey on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:28:29 PM