Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
September 7, 2008 at 04:14:03

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 9/7/08:

High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's Theory Falls Apart

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Len Hart (about the author)     Page 4 of 5 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) was a Pentagon eye-witness. She is a former member of the staff of the Director of the National Security Agency. As a contributing author to the 2006 book 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, she wrote:

I believe the [9/11] Commission failed to deeply examine the topic at hand, failed to apply scientific rigor to its assessment of events leading up to and including 9/11, failed to produce a believable and unbiased summary of what happened, failed to fully examine why it happened, and even failed to include a set of unanswered questions for future research.

It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics.

 --Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret), Twenty-five U.S. Military Officers Challenge Official Account of 9/11.


Bush, Cheney, PNAC, & The Criminal Conspiracy To Invade Iraq

Kwiatkowski one in a long and growing list of equally intelligent, qualified, expert and articulate folk many of whom have literally driven a stake through the heart of Bush's evil and treasonous lie. I might have picked her quote at random from among the throng which now makes up a growing chorus demanding that the crime of 911 be investigated and the perpetrators brought to trial and justice. You won't have any trouble finding other outraged and patriotic Americans who will speak out against tyranny. It is a growing chorus of true skeptics who will tell you that Bush's official conspiracy theory is a black hearted lie.
(CBS) President Bush took a few minutes during his trip to Europe Thursday to voice his opposition to establishing a special commission to probe how the government dealt with terror warnings before Sept. 11.

Mr. Bush said the matter should be dealt with by congressional intelligence committees.

CBS News Correspondent Bill Plante reports that Mr. Bush said the investigation should be confined to Congress because it deals with sensitive information that could reveal sources and methods of intelligence. Therefore, he said, the congressional investigation is "the best place" to probe the events leading up to the terrorist attacks.

--CBS News: Bush Opposes 9/11 Query Panel

Over my long career in broadcasting and journalism, I have never seen a 'leader' --elected, appointed or otherwise --who did not oppose, obstruct, or, in other ways, interfere with investigations into their own regimes. In every instance, the obstruction is motivated by the desire to cover up crimes, destroy evidence, or, most generally, obscure the truth. In every instance, these activities are done not to protect the innocent. They are done to cove rup the crime, to protect the guilty.

Bush's excesses in office stem from the powers he assumed upon the pretext of 911. They include but are not limited to his numerous abrogations of the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights and habeas corpus, his assumption of dictatorial powers as evinced by his many 'signing statements', in fact, his rule by decree. It is all right out of Adolph Hitler's play book. Until these crucial issues having to do with the very legitimacy of our government are addressed, the current election campaign is eyewash. I am waiting for Barack Obama to address the issue of nothing less than the legitimacy of this government.

Flight77.info says that it is trying to secure the release of about 80 videos that are related to the Pentagon crash. However, the Bush administration will not willingly release information or evidence that will prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that no airliner crashed into the Pentagon.

An administration capable of crashing a missile into its own Pentagon with a careless, murderous disregard for human life is likewise capable of lying about the falls of the Twin Towers and WTC 7; it is capable of lying about WMD, it is capable of waging war upon the people of the United States itself. The waging of war against the people by the people's own government is called high treason and traditionally, it requires the death penalty. King Charles I of England was beheaded for less egregious crimes than those which may now be charged to Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice and very other co-conspirator inside the White House.

It would appear that the FBI is up to its ass in the cover up of 911.  I suggest that the cover up of high treason is high treason. Congress should empower a special prosecutor to investigate Bush, the FBI, the Pentagon and the JD. The American people are left little choice but to effect not merely regime change but a sweeping purge, nothing less than the creation of a new government. A new broom sweeps clean! We may yet round up a enough traitors to fill up a football stadium.

This essential update from Goon Squad blogger and pilot --Greg Bacon:

Another aspect of this to consider is called the Wing in Ground effect or WIG.

WIG holds that large aircraft and a 757 is definitely large, can't fly close to the ground because of all of the turbulence created by the aircraft's wings.

A pilot would not be able to control a large aircraft flying that close to the ground, the turbulence kicked up by the wings would be hellish.

The jet would either have to land or gain altitude, it CAN NOT fly that close to the ground, its physically impossible.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/

Len Hart is a Houston based film/video producer specializing in shorts and full-length documentaries. He is a former major market and network correspondent; credits include CBS, ABC-TV and UPI. He maintains the progressive blog: more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Bush Admin"
Bush admin. farm bill plan: so is it really the reform they talked about?: An article from: Pro Farmer
by Gale Reference Team

$9.95

Number of pages: 4
Publisher: Thomson Gale

Bush admin. delays E-Verify, women's Set-Aside.: An article from: Set-Aside Alert
by Gale Reference Team

$9.95

Number of pages: 2
Publisher: Business Research Services, Inc.

Transforming Mental Health Care in America (Federal Action Agenda: 1st Steps)


Number of pages: 83
Publisher: Mental Health Services Admin., DHHS

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
149 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Great Job Len by Bob Gormley on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 6:26:47 AM
thanks bob by Len Hart on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:26:15 AM
Excellent by Bia Winter on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:21:54 AM
You really think Obama will touch 9/11? by Mr M on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:44:34 AM
you're right about Obama by Len Hart on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:02:12 PM
The Big Lie by Wolfie on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:04:49 PM
I'm constantly amazed over the magnitude by Mr M on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 5:11:17 PM
As I consider the puzzle by pft on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:29:40 PM
Where's the Anger? by Rafe Pilgrim on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:37:32 AM
We can't wait on "history" by Mr M on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 6:52:07 PM
You're losing me by Nick van Nes on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:07:37 AM
NIST and WTC 7 by gravity32 on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:19:21 AM
Good stuff, Len, but .... by Keith Mothersson on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:09:58 AM
Video fakery by Cassie on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:26:04 AM
witnesses by Len Hart on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:55:12 PM
I address all these issues... by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:22:55 PM
Energy weapons by Ron R. on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:13:01 AM
I finally located the video of Albury Smith on 9/11 by Albvry Smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:05:30 PM
The witness by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:50:23 PM
THE TALKING POINTS WERE PLANTED by Len Hart on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:32:17 PM
Why fool the editors? by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 6:09:33 AM
I never thought I'd get into this but... by Cheryl Abraham on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:11:36 AM
no airliner struck the Pentagon by Len Hart on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:45:53 PM
Shhhhhh.... by albury smith on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:09:32 PM
shhhhhh by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:41:42 AM
All Politicians Guilty Of High Treason by arlen custer on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:25:38 AM
Congress with Nancy and Harry in the lead by Susan Nelsen on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:29:30 AM
you make dishonest assumptions and raise strawmen by Len Hart on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:03:02 PM
Len, don't waste your time ... by Mr M on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:54:24 PM
Re: '...don't waste your time..." by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:37:23 AM
You two are a hoot by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:04:28 AM
I think Bill OReilly also attended Harvard for his Masters by Albvry Smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:31:26 PM
The saga by Kahnaya Wasahtoha on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:45:35 PM
Lied to the 911 Cover-up Commission by Philip Dennany on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:03:48 PM
"Covering" crashes by Alan Williams on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:23:32 PM
Have you personally met the 911 hijackers? by ken on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:02:04 AM
Honey by richard on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:41:50 PM
911 commission by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:30:14 AM
Some clarification is needed here by ken on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:16:14 AM
RE: Some clarification is needed here by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:39:40 AM
Pawn to king bishop three by Keystone on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:04:56 PM
Lest We Forget. The Pentagon Impact Point. by Ishmael1 on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:10:08 PM
here's some data by shirley reese on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:01:35 PM
the Official Story defies physics, economics, policy & data by Jack Flanders on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:45:43 PM
Re: "Official Story defies physics, economics, policy & data by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:20:58 AM
Despicable cowards by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:11:01 AM
"Despicable cowards" by Jack Flanders on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:32:29 PM
Quite a conspiracy by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:20:51 AM
making up your own facts? by Jack Flanders on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:03:47 AM
Then argue with these people, Jack by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:21:34 AM
wrong again by Jack Flanders on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:22:12 AM
I haven't been proven wrong once by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:50:31 PM
Your evidence is unreliable by Jack Flanders on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:56:46 PM
Your evidence is nonexistent by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:36:32 PM
So where's the video? by Jack Flanders on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:49:06 AM
More sophistry from the "truth" movement by albury smith on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:37:44 PM
Official smoke screen exposed by Jack Flanders on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:29:12 PM
Smokescreen? by albury smith on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:31:14 PM
The hole was insufficient by Jack Flanders on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:47:20 PM
Way too many assumptions by albury smith on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:42:23 PM
No assumptions, just physics by Jack Flanders on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:21:59 PM
"No assumptions, just physics" by Jack Flanders on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:09:59 AM
one more observation by Jack Flanders on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:13:59 AM
"The hole was insufficient" by Len Hart on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 7:39:12 AM
Here's a thought, Len by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 11:34:15 AM
some "thought" by Jack Flanders on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 2:24:00 PM
Diversion by pft on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:37:26 AM
Re: High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' by Munich on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:01:26 AM
high treason and mass murder by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:50:33 AM
covering crashes by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:13:50 AM
You didn't cover this one by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:23:50 AM
Your list was meaningless by Ron R. on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:14:07 PM
If they were there by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:36:29 AM
Mohammed Atta by Bia Winter on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:21:42 AM
How gullible can you get? by albury smith on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:54:26 PM
Re: How gullible can you get? by Len Hart on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 8:12:02 AM
What fallacy? by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 11:38:53 AM
Real dumb comment? by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 10:37:46 AM
It's real simple... by Ron R. on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:58:33 AM
re: It's real simple... by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:55:21 AM
Not you again... by Ron R. on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:55:03 PM
BFD by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:56:10 PM
"I'll bury" said it, not me... by Ron R. on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:03:27 PM
Thanks, but I know what I said by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:50:23 AM
Flight 77 by Albvry Smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:16:52 PM
Your blatant hypocrisy and obfuscation by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:37:46 PM
Albury this doesn't sound like you... by Ron R. on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:20:13 PM
Who's jumping to conclusions? by albury smith on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:09:32 AM
your problem by Len Hart on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 8:02:29 AM
What "problem"? by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 11:22:32 AM
Just plane high! by Hal Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:01:24 AM
Global Hawks by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:31:43 AM
Global Hawk wing span by Len Hart on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 9:07:08 AM
Thanks for sharing by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:28:05 PM
N.O.R.A.D by Keystone on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:35:30 PM
NORAD question by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:42:56 PM
In September Clues... by Bob Smith on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:34:14 AM
From author John Kaminski... by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:45:37 PM
SOS from albury by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:45:49 PM
HAHAHAHA.... by Bob Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:18:23 PM
KABOOOOOM!!!!! by Bob Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:39:26 PM
Hey Len... by Sheila Samples on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:29:45 PM
Calling "I'll bury" Smith by Ron R. on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:47:37 PM
Everybody duck, the feces is flying everywhere by Scott on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:24:41 PM
Duck, everyone. Feces flying everywhere by Scott on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:38:34 PM
the idiocy of people who believe bush about ANYTHING . by Len Hart on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:25:48 AM
B-25 Mitchells by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:15:43 AM
You can't argue with the physics.... by Bob Smith on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:34:36 PM
No, you can't by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:38:52 PM
Energy and matter by Len Hart on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 8:31:22 AM
Job opportunity by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 11:46:45 AM
Of Crooks and idiots by Len Hart on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:55:27 AM
Catch the new Discovery channel summary this Sept. 8th? by editnetwork on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:26:56 PM
Would it have made more sense by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:04:06 PM
A FEDERAL GRAND JURY SHOULD INVESTIGATE BUSH by Len Hart on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:45:11 AM
REAL investigation by albury smith on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:37:20 AM
ad hominems and labels, failure to read by Len Hart on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 7:29:37 AM
Deja vu by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:30:10 PM
Bush defenders believe in JUNK SCIENCE by Len Hart on Saturday, Sep 13, 2008 at 9:01:59 AM
SO.... by Bob Smith on Monday, Sep 15, 2008 at 12:36:37 PM
9/11 was an inside job by Robert Moran on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:27:11 AM
Just a hunch by albury smith on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:33:05 AM
Hunch? by Rafe Pilgrim on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:27:02 AM
Give ME a break by albury smith on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:23:09 AM
Bush's 'army' of official conspiracy nut jobs... by Len Hart on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:00:52 PM
This has already been explained by albury smith on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:10:45 PM
knock yourself out but knock off the stupid ad hominem by Len Hart on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:25:28 PM
That's some conspiracy, doofus by albury smith on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:07:56 PM
Re: Aubrey, the doofus by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:19:47 AM
Once again, for the slow learners by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:13:20 AM
No army - just the scientific method and better theories by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:58:53 PM
physics by Len Hart on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:46:26 AM
That's called begging the question (or just plain lying) by albury smith on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:20:12 AM
That's called spouting unsubstantiated nonsense by ken on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:55:41 AM
Great news for United Airlines by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:03:53 AM
Albury, the MORON by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:19:23 AM
NTSB by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:11:08 PM
Re: Albury by Len Hart on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:40:59 PM
Let's try this one more time... by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:53:13 PM
Tell'm Albert by Keystone on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:36:33 PM
Who's the chickensh*t who flagged this comment? by albury smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:22:25 PM
Crooks and idiots by Len Hart on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:52:55 AM
Neither by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:53:09 AM
Note to the editor by albury smith on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:30:53 AM
I think he's really Mr Murphy! by Bia Winter on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:35:23 AM
You apparently don't think by albury smith on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:58:02 PM
Mr. Smith is Mr. Smith - I am Mr. Murphy by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:32:59 PM
Mr. Murphy by tim bristol on Friday, Sep 12, 2008 at 2:00:04 PM
Please cancel that request by tim bristol on Friday, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:04:19 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum