Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 5 (8 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   28 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Each 'Key Finding" of the Freeh Report is A Misleading Deception

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 4 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 46   Valuable 37   Supported 35  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 9/2/12

This clearly includes colluding with the AG's office and the NCAA. Freeh hid it in plain sight. So his statements about independence and secrecy are a complete joke. He made those groups part of the SIC on purpose. The leaks could have come from any of them.

A Grand Jury is the prosecutions tool used to gain indictments. The attorneys question witnesses with a sole purpose - to enter into the record incriminating evidence ONLY. They ask no questions that might have exculpatory answers. There is no cross-examination. There is no defense attorney present to ask questions. The entire process is totally one-sided and prejudicial by design - all prosecution and NO defense. 

Freeh was supposed to be conducting a full investigation to get at the truth. His report was not presumed to rubber stamp an indictment procedure. This is extremely important and should immediately make anyone who accepted the Freeh Report as a serious fair and balanced inquiry to seek truth to re-evaluate their opinion.

McQueary Asked to be Interviewed by Freeh 

We know Mike McQueary spoke to Joe for 10 minutes. Four of the words he used in that 10 minute talk were reportedly "a sexual nature" and "fondling" 4 words out of how many he spoke that day a decade in the past and in what context?   

There is now some evidence to the contrary. From Joe himself in his conversation with Gary Gray on Dec 6th. Our memories are interesting things - particularly the memory of an 85 year old a decade following a brief conversation. As it becomes more important and we have time to reflect on it things come back to us. So after being removed as head coach and the media frenzy did Joe recall more of the conversation? 

Was it something like this during the 5 or 6 minutes Mike spoke to Joe?

"Joe I don't know exactly what was happening. I expected to see two adults having sex when I heard those sounds. I visualized seeing that prior to glancing for 1 or 2 seconds. I wasn't sure what I was seeing. Something of a sexual nature? Fondling or something like that? I just can't be certain my observation was so brief and I was so shocked when it wasn't two adults like I expected. I thought something of a sexual nature was happening in the showers from the sounds I heard prior to glancing inside but seeing an older man's backside at first glance and the boy on the second glance was not what I expected. So I can't be certain what I was seeing" 

YDid Joe ask Mike what they talked about after he received his subpoena in Dec of 2010? I would have if I didn't recall what was said a decade prior to the serving. Mike and Joe were working together. Why wouldn't they discuss it? 

The media and Kelly made the world think that this was such a huge deal to Joe Tim and Gary they could not possibly forget what was said in those brief encounters a decade in the past. But that is simply absurd if they came to believe that Mike's 1 or 2 second glances were of Jerry doing his bear hug routine with no sexual intent as was the conclusion of the DPW and CYS in 1998. 

Read more articles on the Freeh Fiction 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

Editor and owner of The Second Mile Sandusky Scandal Weblog The most complete collection of information on what has been unfairly labeled The Penn State Sex Scandal. Graduate of the Univ of TN in Public Administration, (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

PSU and Paterno Not Guilty - McQueary Testimony Proves It.

1998: So Close to an End for Sandusky - Who Interfered and Why?

Did Freeh Frame Joe Paterno?

Each 'Key Finding" of the Freeh Report is A Misleading Deception

Penn State Paterno/ Sandusky Story; One Year Anniversary - We Now Know the Truth

So You Think Joe Paterno is a Liar?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 28 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Is/Was Mr. Freeh and his organization simply incom... by Keith Ward on Sunday, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:37:31 PM
He is known to be a long time acquaintance of the ... by Barry Bozeman on Sunday, Sep 2, 2012 at 4:37:52 PM
Judge Lewis - Attorney for Graham Spanier took the... by Barry Bozeman on Sunday, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:05:28 PM
It was always clear that the Freeh report is full ... by Chris Zacko on Sunday, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:25:29 PM
It is becoming clear to many of us that the Freeh ... by Barry Bozeman on Sunday, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:29:37 PM
Also note that Freeh subcontracted a lot of this w... by Wendy Silverwood on Sunday, Sep 2, 2012 at 8:04:28 PM
is also beyond all bounds of impropriety. Fre... by Barry Bozeman on Monday, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:29:04 AM
...and it's Louis Freeh and his shoddy investigati... by Lisa Taylor on Monday, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:19:03 AM
steaming in the August sun. The inability to ... by Barry Bozeman on Monday, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:34:11 AM
And thank YOU for doing your "due diligence" - a c... by Lisa Taylor on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:14:48 PM
No question the Freeh Reoprt was a poorly construc... by Mike Simons on Monday, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:04:05 AM
The problem with this assessment, Mike, is that yo... by Cathy Sheffler on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:42:23 AM
...that the 2001 so-called "shower incident" is on... by Lisa Taylor on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:21:05 PM
Sandusky faced five charges from the 2001 "shower ... by Cathy Sheffler on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:11:05 PM
get a clue, 1998,it was the District Attorne... by Sandy Witt on Monday, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:23:08 PM
To SandyYou are right on with your comments re eve... by Mike Simons on Monday, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:23:14 PM
Why don't you check pgs 93 to 98 of the 12/... by Bill Porter on Monday, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:30:12 PM
Thanks for your impute Bill!The physicality descri... by Mike Simons on Monday, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:35:04 PM
" Mike McQueary gave three very explicit and very ... by Cathy Sheffler on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:34:40 PM
To Sandra Thank you for your response to my respon... by Mike Simons on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:06:58 PM
Obviously you can't be 'intelligent' and oppose Si... by Barry Bozeman on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:02:39 AM
Your pointing out these key points is absolutely c... by sandra c. lane on Monday, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:04:19 PM
To SandraSandra, you and I are in complete agreeme... by Mike Simons on Monday, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:42:37 PM
Wonder if Simons is fooling himself? He certa... by Barry Bozeman on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 5:54:47 PM
BB Yerrrrrrr baaaaack! Sweetheart, my man, I ... by Mike Simons on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 11:00:21 PM
The Freehdom Fighters and The Second Mile Sandusk... by Barry Bozeman on Thursday, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:16:23 AM
BBThank you for the thank you! I appreciate your ... by Mike Simons on Friday, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:55:18 PM
NOTICE ! NOTICE ! NOTICE ! This comments section... by Mike Simons on Monday, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:37:04 PM