Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   3 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

China is eating our lunch. What might we do about it?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 4 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Interesting 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 1/23/11

Become a Fan
  (108 fans)

For corporate America, the Great Recession is over.   For the American work force, it's not.

Unfortunately, fixing the job market will take years.   Even if job growth accelerated to the rapid pace of the late 1990s and remained there, the unemployment rate would not fall below 6 percent (which some economists consider full employment) until 2016!   We are now, quite likely, only in the first half of the longest stretch of high unemployment since World War II.

The best way to put people back to work is to lift economic growth?  

For Washington, lifting growth will first mean avoiding the mistakes of 2010, when the Fed, the White House and some members of Congress prematurely assumed that a solid recovery was under way.   The risk this year is that they will start reducing the budget deficit immediately by cutting federal programs, rather than having the cuts take effect in future years.

Policy makers could also help the unemployed by spreading unemployment more broadly among the population.   I realize this idea may not sound so good at first -- Who wants more unemployment?   But the fact is that this downturn has concentrated its effects on a relatively narrow group of Americans.   And if unemployment compensation is sufficiently increased, along with the length of time one might collect such compensation, the shrinking amount of available work could be more equitably shared -" to everyone's benefit.   If this can be done so successfully and beneficially in Europe, why not here?


In Germany and Canada, some companies and workers have averted layoffs by agreeing to cut everyone's hours and, thus, their pay as well.   However, in Germany at least, the government provides pay supplements to the workers so that even though their hours have been reduced, their monthly income remains unchanged.   This enabled Germany to avert most of the recession that has plagued the US and other countries.   Why and how so?   Because German workers did not cut back on their spending as a result of reduced wages.   Owing to government-provided income supplements, their spending remained unchanged, thereby maintaining the effective consumer demand that kept other Germans employed in the production of the products and services that were thereby kept in demand.

In America, unemployment remains terribly high, and almost half of the unemployed have been out of work for at least six months.   These are the people bearing the brunt of the downturn.

Germany's job-sharing program -- known as "Kurzarbeit," or short work -- has won praise from both conservative and liberal economists.   Senator Jack Reed, Democrat of Rhode Island, has offered a bill that would encourage similar programs.   So far, though, characteristically timid in the face of the corporate objections that would surely develop, the White House has not welcomed the idea.  

Restoring some balance to the relationship between employers and employees will be difficult.   One problem is that too many labor unions, like the auto industry's, have been poorly run, thereby hurting companies and, ultimately, workers.   Of course, many other companies -- AT&T, General Electric, Southwest Airlines -- have thrived with unionized workers, and study after study has shown that unions usually do benefit workers.   As one bumper sticker says, "Unions:   The folks who brought you the weekend."

Today, however, unions are clearly playing on an uneven field.   Thanks to a timid government, largely "bought out' by corporations and the rich, companies pay minimal penalties for illegally trying to bar unions and so have become expert at doing so -- legally and otherwise.   Yet for all their shortcomings, unions remain many workers' best hope for some bargaining power.

The list of promising solutions to the jobs slump are many.   Reforming the disability insurance system so it does not encourage long-term joblessness would help.   "Once people enter that system," as economist Katz of Harvard says, "they basically never come back."   Improving high schools and colleges -- reclaiming the global lead in education -- would help even more.   Remember, the jobless rate for college graduates is only 4.8 percent, and plenty of highly skilled jobs in America continue to go unfilled.

However, the jobs slump has become too severe to disappear anytime soon.   It will be part of the American economy and American politics for years to come.   But there is no reason to treat it as a problem that's immune from solutions.   For starters, it would be worth figuring out what other countries are doing right.   Countries like Germany for instance.  (Click here for source article.)

Poverty and recovery

In 2008, the first year of the Great Recession, the number of Americans living in poverty rose by 1.7 million to nearly 47.5 million.   While hugely painful, that rise wasn't surprising given the unraveling economy.   What is surprising is that recent census data show that those poverty numbers held steady in 2009, even though job loss worsened significantly that year.  

Clearly, the sheer scale of poverty -- 17% of the country's population, and anywhere between 18 and 27% of its children (varying from state to state)

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
China has a national economic strategy. Why not the US?

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

New JFK assassination bombshells

Was Pat Tillman Murdered by an American Sharpshooter to Shut Him up?

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense

Two U.S. presidents implicated by ex-CIA black-ops assassin

Four Ticking Time Bombs That Will Soon Ignite a Revolution

The Ultimate Goal of the Bankster-led Political-economic Warfare Being Waged Against Us Is . . . ?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

A recent article in the Wall Street Journal showed... by Richard Clark on Sunday, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:18:12 PM
Say what you want about the Chinese government, bu... by Bruce Morgan on Sunday, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:52:22 PM
But for the time being I keep hoping that if enoug... by Richard Clark on Sunday, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:07:20 PM