Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (5 comments)

Can we start new employee-owned companies in Ohio on a mass scale? Tools from Spain

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Get Embed HTML Code
By John Logue  Posted by David Kendall (about the submitter)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (2 fans)   -- Page 4 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com

At the time the employees took over the company, it had been subject to substantial disinvestment and needed to be recapitalized. That was financed from three sources:

The first was the payment of 24 months unemployment compensation in a lump sum to the employees to invest in the company. Wasn’t this a risk? "Sure, but it was the only option to preserve our jobs," said board president Maria Feli Arrizabalaga, who is an inside sales person and has 30 years seniority at Izar.

The second was the advance of severance pay from the national severance pay fund (which backstops insolvent companies for their severance obligations (20 days pay per year worked up to 12 months pay) as a loan to the company. That loan is currently a matter of dispute since the government has twice passed legislation forgiving loans for from this fund made for the purpose of keeping firms open as Sociedades Laborales.

The third was a 20 percent pay cut and increase in working hours agreed to by employees. Subsequently the company required additional capitalization in 1997, and the employees put in additional funds.

Izar is governed by an elected administrative board (similar to a Board of Directors) of 7 members. The General Manager is not a member of the board. All of them are inside members (and unpaid), drawn from various areas of the company: inside sales, workshop manager, purchasing, machine operator, quality control, etc., and elected by the employee owners. Additionally, there is a non-member secretary of the board, an outside lawyer, who is paid. The presence of an outside lawyer in the Board is legally mandated. "It’s a balanced board that reflects the makeup of the company," says Pujana. That’s better, he thinks, than the previous board that represented primarily production. The board meets monthly, and Pujana reports to it. The company is also unionized, and Pujana meets with the union on a monthly basis as well. Board officers are elected by the board, but the Izar pattern is to elect the top vote getters among the board members as President and Vice-President.

The company is owned by 130 of its 204 employees as a Sociedad Anonima Laboral (SAL). All permanent employees are owners, and none but employees are owners. Unlike other SALs, all permanent employees are expected to become members. By contractual agreement (which is not a SL legal requirement), employees who retire are required to sell their shares back to the company, and the company is required to buy them. Shares are valued at the price originally paid by the initial SAL members, adjusted for inflation. The current value of the original members’ shares is 28,000 (ca. $38,000). New employees put in 14,000 for their ownership stakes. This can be paid through a wage checkoff over a period of up to 10 years, depending of the needs of each employee.

In general the company has plowed 70% of profits back into reinvestment in the company (and it now has a brand new plant), far above the 10% compulsory reinvestment in the SL sector; it has paid out 30% of profits to its employee owners in dividends. Today Izar is the largest producer of cutting tools in Spain and one of the top 5 in Europe.

John Logue is the director of the Ohio Employee Ownership Center and a professor of political science at Kent State University. He visited Spain in October with the Cleveland Foundation study group and stayed on to visit ASLE, Izar Cutting Tools, and Elkar-lan. He appreciates the assistance and hospitality of Jone Nolte Usparitza and Josetxo Hernandez Duñabeitia, of Carlos Pujana, and of Mirene Arri of those organizations, respectively.

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

And if these companies fail? by Richmond Shreve on Monday, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:07:54 PM
Response by David Kendall on Tuesday, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:13:25 PM
Lump sum... by David Kendall on Wednesday, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:40:32 AM
Verified by David Kendall on Wednesday, Jan 21, 2009 at 7:46:27 PM
You might enjoy The Brooklyn Project by Mark Goldes on Tuesday, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:51:50 PM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2012, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum