PUBLICALLY FUNDED ELECTIONS using HAND COUNTED PAPER BALLOTS on a NEW PAID FEDERAL VOTING HOLIDAY
...just for starters...
Robin Hordon
Thanks Arabesque - will do!
Richard Gage, AIA, Architect
|
|
(more...)
, (less...)
Add to My Group(s)
Add to My Group(s)
Submitted by Robin Hordon on Sun, 06/29/2008 - 5:54pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points
Excellent point Submitted by richardgage on Tue, 07/01/2008 - 3:13am.
» login to post comments | 3 points
Exemplary! Exellent letter Mr.Gage! I thought the final sentence...("We have the technical expertise to support your own research into the collapses of the 3 World Trade Center high-rise "collapses" on 9/11, and we offer ourselves in service to you.")...was a superb way to close your letter.
Although there are only a "few" politicians (compared to voters)...maybe this will persade Wexler to come out and say something?....................we'll see.
C'mon Wexler, ...be one of the "few", ..."the proud" ...join with the "ones" who ask questions.
Submitted by yohnzeye on Sun, 06/29/2008 - 6:13pm.
» login to post comments | 5 points
Help email architects. Let's help Gage.
Submitted by TomT on Sun, 06/29/2008 - 6:23pm.
» login to post comments | 2 points
Very creative video editing! Thanks Tom! This is a great AE911Truth action compilation! May we use it on our site?
Richard Gage, AIA, Architect
Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Regardless of non-response, please put pressure on Congress to answer to this crime.
Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
 Contact Editor |
Comments
The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.
This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.
| 1 comments |
To view all comments:
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Gage vs. the Truth
by albury smith on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:07:04 AM
I'd like to see more criticism of NIST in these petitions. These are blatant and obvious issues that are just as compelling as the evidence for demolition.
Examples:
1. The NIST report is only a PRE-collapse report.
2. The NIST FAQ called molten steel "irrelevant to the investigation". (I'm not making this up.)
3. The NIST report used exaggerated computer models to "prove" that collapse could START--they did not explain the total collapse of the buildings.
4. NIST's own steel tests PROVED that the towers should have remained standing.
5. The NIST report is deceptive and unscientific. See here: http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/kevin_ryan/newstandard.html
As well, the building designer claims are further compelling evidence that is often underemployed in criticism of the official story. These are the experts who built the buildings, and they were designed to survive 9/11.
See here: http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/05/world-trade-center-building-des...
_______________
Arabesque: 911 Truth