Thanks Arabesque - will do!
Richard Gage, AIA, Architect
![]() |
By Richard Gage AIA, Posted by Kathryn Smith (about the submitter) Page 4 of 5 page(s)
Love, Peace and Progress with: PUBLICALLY FUNDED ELECTIONS using HAND COUNTED PAPER BALLOTS on a NEW PAID FEDERAL VOTING HOLIDAY ...just for starters... Robin Hordon
Thanks Arabesque - will do!
Richard Gage, AIA, Architect
Exellent letter Mr.Gage! I thought the final sentence...("We have the technical expertise to support your own research into the collapses of the 3 World Trade Center high-rise "collapses" on 9/11, and we offer ourselves in service to you.")...was a superb way to close your letter.
Although there are only a "few" politicians (compared to voters)...maybe this will persade Wexler to come out and say something?....................we'll see.
C'mon Wexler, ...be one of the "few", ..."the proud" ...join with the "ones" who ask questions.
Let's help Gage.
Thanks Tom! This is a great AE911Truth action compilation! May we use it on our site?
Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Regardless of non-response, please put pressure on Congress to answer to this crime.
Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Editor |
| 1 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |
I'd like to see more criticism of NIST in these petitions. These are blatant and obvious issues that are just as compelling as the evidence for demolition.
Examples:
1. The NIST report is only a PRE-collapse report.
2. The NIST FAQ called molten steel "irrelevant to the investigation". (I'm not making this up.)
3. The NIST report used exaggerated computer models to "prove" that collapse could START--they did not explain the total collapse of the buildings.
4. NIST's own steel tests PROVED that the towers should have remained standing.
5. The NIST report is deceptive and unscientific. See here: http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/kevin_ryan/newstandard.html
As well, the building designer claims are further compelling evidence that is often underemployed in criticism of the official story. These are the experts who built the buildings, and they were designed to survive 9/11.
See here: http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/05/world-trade-center-building-des...
_______________
Arabesque: 911 Truth