Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 2 Share on StumbleUpon 2 Tell A Friend 1 (7 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   9 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
Life Arts

A VIEW FROM THE PROGRESSIVE SIDE: Ayn Rand's Despised "Altruism" Is Essential to Building a NATION of "Producers."

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 4 of 8 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 9/20/12

Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

At the broader level of national politics, this same instinct is what moves the "haves" in society to help elect, and then support with their tax dollars and energies, a government committed to helping the "have-nots."  Many millions of Americans are today held back by the manifold obstacles of poor education, joblessness, crime-ridden neighborhoods, broken homes, and the like.   These victims of society will not be helped by Ayn Rand's insistence that individuals be free to determine and achieve their own self-interest.   Only the social support programs and public investments backed by progressive political leaders can help clear the roadbocks that keep so many Americans from enjoying productive lives.   Empathy urges us to want for others the same opportunity we enjoy ourselves to add value to the world and feel good about ourselves for doing so.   And it is only in following through on that instinct that we live a fully human life.  

The Corrupting Morality of "Guilt and Death."

Rand's views, as interpreted from the words of John Galt in the second segment of his speech:

A fundamental principle in Rand's thought is that society's "producers," operating in accordance with their own rational self-interest, must be left totally free from outside interference in pursuing both the objectives and rewards of their enterprise.     Without such freedom, the necessary focus and drive needed to make the venture a success are distracted, to the detriment both of the producer and employees, and of customers who would gain from the value of the thing or service produced.  

The "interference" on society's producers that Rand has in mind takes many of the same forms about which businesses have always complained: added costs, such as union wages, mandated employee benefits, and taxes; and government regulations, which can be both costly and detrimental to productivity.   In the Galt speech, however, Rand also posits a far darker interference, a malignancy that afflicts the very heart of the producer's creative integrity and morale.   Two insidious powers, Rand claims, threaten the freedom of those who rationally pursue their self-interest through meaningful achievement and material success.   One is the "muscle" (the police power) of the state, which seeks to gain the allegiance of society's masses -- and so its control over them -- by forcing society's producers to share their bounty with them.   The other is the "mysticism" of religion, which requires that the individual surrender his pursuit of rational self-interest to the higher demand of self-sacrifice in the name of an unknown God.

The repressive powers of the state and religion grow out of the moral weakness of the many in society who do not seek to earn their own way by creating value for others.   Instead, Rand argues, the indifferent masses, society's "parasites," take the larcenous view -- reinforced by the state, which seeks to dominate them -- that it is their right to have their needs met by those who are productive.  

In challenging the morality of this view, Rand asks:   If the "producers" must act to benefit others, how can it be right for others to accept benefits they have not earned?   The moral onus is completely one-sided.   Even more insidiously, those who accept benefits without giving value in exchange degrade the role of those who have produced the value.   They elevate failure, weakness, need, incompetence, suffering, vice, and irrationality at the expense of success, strength, wealth, ability, joy, virtue, and rationality.  

Rand believes that "altruism," giving to others without expecting anything in return, is only rational, and thus moral, when the beneficiaries can reasonably be thought to have previously earned it.   Absent this qualification, altruism sets the standards of a false morality that is in opposition to the requirements of living.   It deprives the individuals who receive it of the practical guidance implicit in moral certainty, and removes from them the motivation to be a producer of value in life, which is the only source of personal dignity, self-esteem, and happiness.

Rand notes further that many of society's "parasites" recognize the moral damage done to them as recipients of unearned "altruism."   Even so, they are not motivated to reject it, since they no longer link their sense of self-esteem to their own achievement, but find it instead in cooperation with the collective will.   That conformity makes it easy for those who exercise power in the state to maintain control of the masses.   Their domination is made even more secure by the state's successful promotion of the idea that trust in the individual mind rests not on reason, but on "faith."   In buying into this idea, the masses readily accept the corollary notion that it is collective opinion alone that is scientific and capable of objective knowledge.  

The autonomy of the individual is further undermined by agents Rand identifies as the "mystics" of religious faith.   Like the enforcers of state power, the "mystics" also posit a more reliable source of knowledge than the mind: in their case, the providence of an unseen "God."   Rand rejects this idea on its face, since it defies her "law of identity."   This is the notion that the mind can only reason from data it amasses through the senses.   Since the senses can only perceive things in the objective, physical world, nothing outside that world lends itself to comprehension.  

Rand also inveighs against the Judeo-Christian religious tradition, which demands adherence to a pernicious "doctrine of sacrifice" that requires individuals to surrender the independence of their own mind (which is identical to the "self," in Rand's framework of ideas).   In complying with this doctrine, individuals give up their right to the action society deems the most "selfish":   namely, the pursuit of personal achievement and happiness, as it is guided by one's own judgment.

Rand argues that it is quickly obvious, however, that the "doctrine of sacrifice," which she also dubs the "morality of death" (i.e. to the individual mind), creates an insoluble paradox.   Society's non-producers, held in dependency by the state and brainwashed by the doctrines of the church, in fact have no "independence of mind" to sacrifice.   Instead, they must rely for what life they have on the sacrifice of those rational few who do continue to seek achievement and happiness by producing things of value.   This is true, also, of the irrational "musclemen" of the state and the "mystics" of religion, who can only retain their own position and power through the continued consent and aid of the men of reason and ability.  

What is especially galling to John Galt in his speech, and to Rand as his creator, is that both the people and their rulers, even in their abject dependency, deny the producers the respect they deserve and the freedom they require to fully realize their goals and reap the rewards they have earned.   In Rand's view as expressed through John Galt, the ultimate objective of the "morality of death" is to extend the moral guilt already accepted by the masses to the relatively few men and women motivated by reason, ability, and the desire for achievement.   The producers recognize, however, that if they themselves were to give up the pursuit of their own achievement and happiness, that self-denial would also deprive the undeserving of the very wealth and products of value they require to meet their needs.   It is in recognition of this reality that John Galt has called a strike of the producers of the world.   They will demonstrate to the "parasites" and government "looters" of the collective order that it is they whose values must change if the "World Motor" is not to be disabled.   Only if the producers are allowed to create value through an unhindered pursuit of their rational self-interest will the world continue to function.

The Response of a Political Progressive:

Surely, we can agree with Ayn Rand that American society needs, and should encourage, individuals who are willing to invest their energies and risk their security to pursue personal goals of creativity and achievement.  Such "producers" -- as Rand illustrates with John Galt -- help move the world forward and create constructive work for others that provides them both with income and the means to satisfy their own need for self-esteem and happiness.  

Most progressives recognize, however, that a good society rests on more than the freedom to build a business or make a living.   To reference one of Ayn Rand's own defining terms, any "objective" view of society must surely include the many people who do not, or cannot, find either success or material security in America's system of free enterprise.   They include not only those who, for a variety of reasons, fail to live their lives responsibly, but the millions who do and still come up short.  

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8

 

Bob Anschuetz is a retired college English teacher and industrial writer who remains actively committed to the progressive political values of economic fairness, social justice, and global community. In retirement, Bob has continued his work as a (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

We Need a Progressive Primary Challenge to Obama in 2012!

Why Obama Is Necessarily Disappointing Us, and What We Can Do about It.

THE CHALLENGE OF THE CONSERVATIVE MINDSET

A VIEW FROM THE PROGRESSIVE SIDE: Ayn Rand's Despised "Altruism" Is Essential to Building a NATION of "Producers."

Progressive Leadership To Serve the Common Good

Let's Stop Waging War To Advance America's "Interests."

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The thinking of Ayn Rand is known to have once bee... by Robert Anschuetz on Thursday, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:55:07 PM
This is  a regressive critique of Ayn Rand an... by Raj Kumar on Friday, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:35:03 AM
buying and watching the DVD "Atlas Shrugged." The ... by Gentry L Rowsey on Friday, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:56:25 AM
Thank you , Robert, for an interesting analysis.&n... by June Genis on Friday, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:50:52 AM
It may be true "the world doesn't owe us a living"... by David McElroy on Friday, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:49:35 PM
and it takes militaristic social policies to induc... by Gentry L Rowsey on Tuesday, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:31:16 PM
Ayn Rand's philosophy advocates the supremacy of i... by Raj Kumar on Friday, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:23:37 AM
This article makes no sense and betrays a complete... by Raj Kumar on Friday, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:04:14 AM
Like most other commentators, this columnist has c... by Raj Kumar on Friday, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:14:05 AM