Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 8 Share on Facebook 16 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 6 (32 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   24 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

$26 Trillion of Bankster Fraud & Theft According to Ron Paul, Alan Grayson and Bernie Sanders

      (Page 4 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 6   Well Said 5   Supported 5  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 8/5/12

Author 8235
Become a Fan
  (110 fans)
- Advertisement -

To sum up, we've so far seen that the Federal Reserve secretly created $26 trillion (out of thin air), without US government approval.   This adds up to nearly a quarter million dollars per American household.

This money, as stated at the outset, was then handed out to financial institutions like Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, the Royal Bank of Scotland and Deutsche Bank.

Then, lying mainstream media journalist-presstitutes reported that the entire bailout added up to nothing more than $1.2 trillion.   They also said that "this is what a central bank is supposed to do."

But add up all the emergency loans the Federal Reserve distributed to banks between 2007 and 2009 (when the American economy lurched closer to collapse than anyone had previously thought possible) and it represents a much larger pile of money.

Bloomberg News recently made available the fullest version yet of its data on Fed emergency lending , a subject this news organization has written about numerous times in the past year.   The Bloomberg release includes records of about 50,000 transactions the Fed made through seven different financial mechanisms.

At their peak, these seven programs represented $1.2 trillion in loans to banks and financial institutions -- the alleged high-water mark of a massive, systemic bailout whose details the country's central banking authority was, now quite understandably, very reluctant to divulge.

Even as critics have nailed the Fed for being less than forthcoming, few people claim that the central bank did the wrong thing by stepping in to backstop a financial system that seemed to be on the verge of imploding:   "In the middle of the financial crisis, this is what you need.   This is what a central bank is supposed to do," said James Wilcox, a professor at the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley.

However, the utterly fake figures of $1.2 trillion and $7.7 trillion were both refuted on December 13th, 2011 by economist L. Randall Wray, who said the actual number is a full-on $29 Trillion.

- Advertisement -

Therefore the true total of Federal Reserve emergency lending to Wall Street is not the presstitute-reported $1.2 trillion, as Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke contends, nor the $7.7 trillion figure reported by Bloomberg News, which Bernanke publicly contests.   The real number, says economist L. Randall Wray, is a staggering $29 trillion.   Wray writes that Bernanke's recent defense of the lower figure is "misleading" and that the chairman's claim that Fed bailouts do not constitute a form of spending is plain wrong.

So, Was the 26-To-29 Trillion Dollars Enough To Solve the Main Financial Problem Facing This Country?

There is simply no justifiable explanation for why this much money was needed.   As we have seen, it had nothing to do with securing the assets of, or in any way benefitting, ordinary Americans.

But was this enough money to rescue banking institutions and restore them to full and lasting health?   Or, did it merely keep them on life support a little longer, while greatly enriching senior bank officers and corporate CEOs, and also providing them with hundreds of billions of additional dollars with which to gamble in the derivatives market?

The answer is shocking.   The $26 trillion was little more than a temporary gasp for air by companies that are still drowning in debt but which continue to gamble recklessly in the derivatives market.

- Advertisement -

Thanks to deregulation, such as the repeal of the Glass-Steagall act, these institutions were allowed to hold just one dollar in the bank while they gambled in the derivatives market as if they had 5, 10, or even 30 dollars to backstop every hundred dollars of loans and gambling.

To put it into a kind of personal perspective, if you had ten thousand dollars in your checking account, you would suddenly become a millionaire if you could leverage it (borrow additional funds at 0% interest) at the "100X" rate for each dollar in your account.

Conclusion:   These financial institutions have manipulated and abused "the system" in a way that allowed them to do casino gambling on a global scale -- with hundreds of billions of dollars of public money.   And this reckless gambling, with public money, continues to this day.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was Pat Tillman Murdered by an American Sharpshooter to Shut Him up?

New JFK assassination bombshells

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense

Two U.S. presidents implicated by ex-CIA black-ops assassin

Four Ticking Time Bombs That Will Soon Ignite a Revolution

The Ultimate Goal of the Bankster-led Political-economic Warfare Being Waged Against Us Is . . . ?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 people are discussing this page, with 24 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Sanford Weill, the man who helped conceive &... by Richard Clark on Sunday, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:53:04 PM
Thanks for the numbers and the news that some cour... by Laura Stein on Saturday, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:55:14 AM
Figures so large that the human brain has not evol... by Daniel Geery on Monday, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:36:21 AM
Yes, our war machine is probably just as expensive... by Richard Clark on Monday, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:16:34 PM
It is only going to get worse after the election.&... by Patricia Gray on Tuesday, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:10:53 PM
Iranian Press TV reported on July 30 that a T... by Rehmat Khawaja on Monday, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:03:01 AM
One might also say, Main Street got off easy. With... by Mike Dar on Monday, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:07:13 PM
. . both theoretically and realistically.... by Richard Clark on Monday, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:28:15 PM
Dear Mike, I've rewritten your comments i... by Richard Clark on Monday, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:21:00 PM
> They wouldn't have failed if the government ... by Mike Dar on Tuesday, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:17:50 AM
This is correct and we'd probably be much worse of... by Robert Cogan on Monday, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:42:47 PM
Dennis   and I are 100% correct - Fed must be... by Holbrook Boruck on Monday, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:00:25 PM
O and the Ds gambled (with a lot of help from the ... by Walter J Smith on Monday, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:36:45 PM
. . certainly a mystery.  I suspect it is bec... by Richard Clark on Monday, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:54:55 PM
Ben Bernanke is sweating bullets. The Federal ... by Lance Ciepiela on Monday, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:47:00 PM
There may be deeper audit, but never a complete au... by Mike Dar on Tuesday, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:51:52 PM
At the London School of Economics, Australian econ... by Richard Clark on Monday, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:58:43 PM
In years past, retired folks were able to live off... by Richard Clark on Monday, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:17:24 PM
Greetings,Richard, I agree with you that Mitt and ... by Kellis R. Solomon on Tuesday, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:38:07 AM
. . they simply don't want to talk about it. ... by Richard Clark on Tuesday, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:05:44 AM
A new report from the conservative Government Acco... by Richard Clark on Tuesday, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:31:54 AM
Are they showing us the way?   Click... by Richard Clark on Tuesday, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:56:09 PM
n/t... by Laura Stein on Saturday, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:01:30 AM
One insider is telling the truth about TARP, th... by Richard Clark on Wednesday, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:00:28 AM