Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest 1 Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   6 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

4 quick points about the MSNBC discussion

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 8   Valuable 6   Must Read 5  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 12/28/13

Become a Fan
  (110 fans)
Source: Glenn Greenwald Blog


Glenn greenwald portrait
(image by Wikimedia)


Regarding my MSNBC discussion yesterday with Kristen Welker:

1) I didn't say that everyone at MSNBC constantly defends Obama. I am well aware -- as Kristen Welker so notably put it -- that "not everyone on MSNBC does that 24 hours a day." The indisputable point is that many, many people calling themselves journalists on MSNBC do exactly that.

2)  My main point was to note the stunning irony of being told on MSNBC -- of all places -- that a journalist "crosses the line" by expressing opinions and having political agendas. The last outlet that ought to be trumpeting that obsolete myth is MSNBC. This is, after all, a network that employs a veritable army of former Obama and DNC aides as hosts and "analysts," along with dozens of people whose entire worldview is shaped by devotion to the President and his Party's interests.

I'm not someone who believes that it's wrong for journalists to have opinions and agendas, but whatever else is true, a network that does this and this and this isn't exactly in a very good position to lecture journalists on the need to be opinion-free and without political agendas.

3)  It's particularly ironic to hear that (a) a journalist is doing something improper ("crossing the line") by defending his source, while (b) it's perfectly proper for journalists to devote their entire careers to defending and venerating the most powerful political official in the nation. Doesn't that reverse the formulation rather radically?

As Digby says, defending one's source happens to be smack in the middle of "the job description" of a journalist. By rather stark contrast, uncritically praising and revering the nation's most powerful political leaders is sort of the opposite of journalism. If you want to find something that actually "crosses the lines" of journalism (whatever those might be), look to the latter, not the former.

4)  If you want to argue with someone who (unlike me) actually made absolutist claims about MSNBC's blinding pro-Obama hackery, go find these two individuals:


Bill Clinton

Barack Obama

 

For the past 10 years, I was a litigator in NYC specializing in First Amendment challenges, civil rights cases, and corporate and securities fraud matters. I am the author of the New York Times Best-Selling book, How Would A Patriot (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

HSBC, too big to jail, is the new poster child for US two-tiered justice system

US investigates possible WikiLeaks leaker for "communicating with the enemy"

Prosecution of Anonymous activists highlights war for Internet control

The myth of Obama's "blunders" and "weakness"

Are All Telephone Calls Recorded And Accessible To The US Government?

The Remarkable, Unfathomable Ignorance of Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

"It's particularly ironic to hear that (a) a journ... by Amy Schreiner on Saturday, Dec 28, 2013 at 1:57:50 AM
Thank you for the quality of your reporting and de... by Ethan Allen on Saturday, Dec 28, 2013 at 3:53:05 AM
So pro Democrat is 'hackery'? How much did Rupert ... by Jessayin on Sunday, Dec 29, 2013 at 7:29:23 AM
Mr Greenwald, there are 8 points being asked of yo... by remo on Sunday, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:02:27 PM
"remo" Glenn Greenwald addressed Sibel Edwards' s... by Ethan Allen on Sunday, Dec 29, 2013 at 4:25:50 PM
I just saw Greenwald on Democracy Now this morning... by Stephen Zimmett on Monday, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:05:31 AM