Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

$34.4 Million Can't Seem To Buy Prop 37 (GM Food-Labeling Bill) Opponents Their Own Facts, By Zack Kaldveer

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 10/1/12

opednews.com

Apparently $34.4 million in pesticide and junk food money can't buy the opponents of Proposition 37 their own set of facts.

Case in point: A new L.A. Times poll shows Prop 37 winning by more than a 2-to-1 margin among registered California voters. And, according to the recent Pepperdine poll the opposition's support actually dropped four points over the past two weeks.

So while their treasure trove of special-interest money can pay for an endless supply of tired, discredited talking points , it can't seem to convince consumers we don't deserve to know what's in the food we eat.

It's not hard to understand why. The companies bankrolling the opposition campaign -- including pesticide giants Monsanto ($7.2 million) and Dupont ($4.9 million) -- will say and spend anything to prevent the kind of transparency that labeling of genetically modified (GMs) foods would provide. And without transparency there can be no accountability.

Here are a few facts: A growing body of research links GM foods to potential health risks, increased pesticide use, biodiversity loss, the emergence of "super bugs" and  "super weeds" and the unintentional contamination of conventional crops.

What Prop 37 will do is add a line of ink to a label -- as is currently required for 3,000 other ingredients -- so consumers know which products have been altered in a laboratory.  That's why the vast majority of Californians support this common-sense measure, and it's why 50 other countries already require that GM foods be labeled.

But that's not all : This summer, Monsanto began selling its first GM sweet-corn product at Walmart. The sweet corn is engineered to withstand the herbicide Roundup and also contains an insecticide (Bt toxin) within the cells of the corn.

Are your children eating Monsanto's latest concoction? You won't know because we don't require labeling. In response to Walmart's decision to undermine the will of its customers, the Yes on 37 campaign released a new ad highlighting the fact that California children are eating unlabeled GM sweet corn without the knowledge of their parents.

And now, recently published in the highly regarded journal of Food and Chemical Toxicology, comes the first long-term,  peer-reviewed animal-feeding study involving GM corn.  Rats fed GM corn developed massive tumors and organ failure and died prematurely. These findings have prompted the French government to call for an investigation into GM foods, and Russia to suspend imports of GM corn.

The study was roundly criticized by Monsanto's band of scientists, who were out in force trying to discredit the study design -- but what they failed to mention is that Monsanto's own studies that supposedly indicate "safety" are based on the same study design: similar size study, same rats. The only real differences is that the French study was free of industry influence and pressure, was more comprehensive and stringent, and was long-term rather than short.

The most shocking thing of all about the French study is that it is the first long-term feeding study on genetically engineered corn that has been on the American market for more than 15 years. So where's the science? The reason we have been denied such critical information is that biotech companies like Monsanto have controlled and suppressed research.

We need and deserve more independent research in this area. In the mean time, we have a right to know and to decide for ourselves whether we want to eat Monsanto's genetically engineered corn. Prop 37 will give us that right.

 

Zack Kaldveer is the Assistant Media Director for the Organic Consumers Association. Zack served as the Assistant Media Director for California's Prop 37 campaign (labeling of genetically modified foods) and was the former Communications Director (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Pesticide Industry-Backed Opponents of Prop 37 Caught in Possible Criminal Act

CA Prop 37: Tobacco/DDT Advocate Henry Miller and the Dubious Scientific Credibility of Labeling Opponents

The Mark Lynas Mythology: The GMO "Conversion" NON-Story, By Zack Kaldveer

$34.4 Million Can't Seem To Buy Prop 37 (GM Food-Labeling Bill) Opponents Their Own Facts, By Zack Kaldveer

Prop 37 and Corporate Lies in the Post Truth Era, By Zack Kaldveer

Prop 37 Solution to Walmart's Untested, Unlabeled, Toxin Spliced Corn

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Also, check this video!http://www.youtube.com/watc... by Zack Kaldveer on Monday, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:05:48 PM
I've been doing a lot of research on this subject ... by Kim Cassidy on Tuesday, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:28:49 AM